作为殖民功能的弹性实践:重新思考现代性、抵抗与适应性治理的参与

IF 2.7 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Antipode Pub Date : 2025-06-08 DOI:10.1111/anti.70035
Clement Amponsah
{"title":"作为殖民功能的弹性实践:重新思考现代性、抵抗与适应性治理的参与","authors":"Clement Amponsah","doi":"10.1111/anti.70035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As the world continues to grapple with severe climate change impacts over the past decade, states and international organisations are committing to ambitious policies/projects to build “resilience” while scaling up development efforts. At a critical juncture where questions of political power and knowledge production become salient, this paper examines why certain well-intentioned resilience interventions fail and (re)produce unintended consequences. Drawing from ethnography in Bongo in the Upper East Region of Northern Ghana, I argue that despite neoliberal framings of “bottom-up” participation, resilience praxis appropriates neo-colonial subjectivities and power inequivalence that engender counter-modernist spaces for onto-epistemic struggles, community resistance, and development failure. Beyond including farmers in decision-making in a tokenistic manner, I call for decolonial consciousness to critique historicities of power and recognise non-modern ideologies: as an alternative ontology to deconstruct coloniality in critical adaptation governance. I conclude that resilience praxis must move beyond tokenistic participation and embrace a plurality/pluriversality of worlds to co-produce contextually grounded and “just” climate solutions in the Anthropocene.</p>","PeriodicalId":8241,"journal":{"name":"Antipode","volume":"57 5","pages":"1792-1824"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anti.70035","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resilience Praxis as a Function of Coloniality: Rethinking Modernity, Resistance, and Participation in Adaptation Governance\",\"authors\":\"Clement Amponsah\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/anti.70035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>As the world continues to grapple with severe climate change impacts over the past decade, states and international organisations are committing to ambitious policies/projects to build “resilience” while scaling up development efforts. At a critical juncture where questions of political power and knowledge production become salient, this paper examines why certain well-intentioned resilience interventions fail and (re)produce unintended consequences. Drawing from ethnography in Bongo in the Upper East Region of Northern Ghana, I argue that despite neoliberal framings of “bottom-up” participation, resilience praxis appropriates neo-colonial subjectivities and power inequivalence that engender counter-modernist spaces for onto-epistemic struggles, community resistance, and development failure. Beyond including farmers in decision-making in a tokenistic manner, I call for decolonial consciousness to critique historicities of power and recognise non-modern ideologies: as an alternative ontology to deconstruct coloniality in critical adaptation governance. I conclude that resilience praxis must move beyond tokenistic participation and embrace a plurality/pluriversality of worlds to co-produce contextually grounded and “just” climate solutions in the Anthropocene.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antipode\",\"volume\":\"57 5\",\"pages\":\"1792-1824\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anti.70035\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antipode\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anti.70035\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antipode","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anti.70035","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去十年中,随着世界继续与严重的气候变化影响作斗争,各国和国际组织正在致力于制定雄心勃勃的政策/项目,在加大发展努力的同时建立“复原力”。在政治权力和知识生产问题变得突出的关键时刻,本文探讨了为什么某些善意的弹性干预失败并(重新)产生意想不到的后果。从加纳北部上东区邦戈地区的民族志中,我认为,尽管新自由主义的框架是“自下而上”的参与,但弹性实践利用了新殖民主义的主体性和权力不平等,这些主体性和权力不平等产生了反现代主义的空间,用于自我认知斗争,社区抵抗和发展失败。除了以象征性的方式将农民纳入决策之外,我呼吁以非殖民意识来批判权力的历史性,并承认非现代意识形态:作为在关键适应性治理中解构殖民性的另一种本体论。我的结论是,复原力实践必须超越象征性的参与,拥抱多元世界,共同产生基于人类世背景的“公正”气候解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Resilience Praxis as a Function of Coloniality: Rethinking Modernity, Resistance, and Participation in Adaptation Governance

Resilience Praxis as a Function of Coloniality: Rethinking Modernity, Resistance, and Participation in Adaptation Governance

As the world continues to grapple with severe climate change impacts over the past decade, states and international organisations are committing to ambitious policies/projects to build “resilience” while scaling up development efforts. At a critical juncture where questions of political power and knowledge production become salient, this paper examines why certain well-intentioned resilience interventions fail and (re)produce unintended consequences. Drawing from ethnography in Bongo in the Upper East Region of Northern Ghana, I argue that despite neoliberal framings of “bottom-up” participation, resilience praxis appropriates neo-colonial subjectivities and power inequivalence that engender counter-modernist spaces for onto-epistemic struggles, community resistance, and development failure. Beyond including farmers in decision-making in a tokenistic manner, I call for decolonial consciousness to critique historicities of power and recognise non-modern ideologies: as an alternative ontology to deconstruct coloniality in critical adaptation governance. I conclude that resilience praxis must move beyond tokenistic participation and embrace a plurality/pluriversality of worlds to co-produce contextually grounded and “just” climate solutions in the Anthropocene.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Antipode
Antipode GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Antipode has published dissenting scholarship that explores and utilizes key geographical ideas like space, scale, place, borders and landscape. It aims to challenge dominant and orthodox views of the world through debate, scholarship and politically-committed research, creating new spaces and envisioning new futures. Antipode welcomes the infusion of new ideas and the shaking up of old positions, without being committed to just one view of radical analysis or politics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信