检视在北卡罗莱纳获得免费纳洛酮的地理差异:纳洛酮分配计划的横断面调查

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Grace Marley PharmD, Caroline Shubel MPh, Carolyn T. Thorpe PhD MPh, Izabela E. Annis M.S., Paul Delamater PhD, Delesha Carpenter PhD MSPh, Bayla Ostrach PhD, MA, CIP
{"title":"检视在北卡罗莱纳获得免费纳洛酮的地理差异:纳洛酮分配计划的横断面调查","authors":"Grace Marley PharmD,&nbsp;Caroline Shubel MPh,&nbsp;Carolyn T. Thorpe PhD MPh,&nbsp;Izabela E. Annis M.S.,&nbsp;Paul Delamater PhD,&nbsp;Delesha Carpenter PhD MSPh,&nbsp;Bayla Ostrach PhD, MA, CIP","doi":"10.1111/jrh.70069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The objective of this study was to comprehensively identify the programs that distribute naloxone at no-cost in North Carolina, identify where and to whom these programs distribute naloxone, and evaluate disparities in reported naloxone distribution by geographic area.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A cross-sectional online survey was delivered to potential no-cost naloxone distributors in NC identified by a community advisory panel. Descriptive statistics and Fisher exact tests were utilized to identify disparities in naloxone access by population served (people who use drugs, people who inject drugs) and location of naloxone distribution (rural; urban/suburban).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Approximately 76.5% (241/315) of respondents representing 341 different programs reported that their program(s) distributed no-cost naloxone to community members. Programs represented included health departments (<i>n</i> = 81), treatment programs/centers (<i>n</i> = 59), and syringe service programs(SSPs) (<i>n</i> = 41), among others. Programs reported distributing naloxone most frequently to people who use drugs (94.2%) and people with a substance use disorder history (94.3%). No-cost naloxone distribution was reported less frequently to all patient populations in rural ZIP codes when compared to urban ZIP codes, including justice-involved populations (86.4% vs. 98.3%) and individuals leaving treatment or detox (87.9% vs. 98.6%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study indicates that although most areas in NC were served by at least one no-cost naloxone program, distribution to rural populations may be limited, indicating a need for increased public investment in no-cost naloxone distribution to populations at greatest risk of overdose.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jrh.70069","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining geographic disparities in access to no-cost naloxone in North Carolina: A cross-sectional survey of naloxone distribution programs\",\"authors\":\"Grace Marley PharmD,&nbsp;Caroline Shubel MPh,&nbsp;Carolyn T. Thorpe PhD MPh,&nbsp;Izabela E. Annis M.S.,&nbsp;Paul Delamater PhD,&nbsp;Delesha Carpenter PhD MSPh,&nbsp;Bayla Ostrach PhD, MA, CIP\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jrh.70069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>The objective of this study was to comprehensively identify the programs that distribute naloxone at no-cost in North Carolina, identify where and to whom these programs distribute naloxone, and evaluate disparities in reported naloxone distribution by geographic area.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A cross-sectional online survey was delivered to potential no-cost naloxone distributors in NC identified by a community advisory panel. Descriptive statistics and Fisher exact tests were utilized to identify disparities in naloxone access by population served (people who use drugs, people who inject drugs) and location of naloxone distribution (rural; urban/suburban).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Approximately 76.5% (241/315) of respondents representing 341 different programs reported that their program(s) distributed no-cost naloxone to community members. Programs represented included health departments (<i>n</i> = 81), treatment programs/centers (<i>n</i> = 59), and syringe service programs(SSPs) (<i>n</i> = 41), among others. Programs reported distributing naloxone most frequently to people who use drugs (94.2%) and people with a substance use disorder history (94.3%). No-cost naloxone distribution was reported less frequently to all patient populations in rural ZIP codes when compared to urban ZIP codes, including justice-involved populations (86.4% vs. 98.3%) and individuals leaving treatment or detox (87.9% vs. 98.6%).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study indicates that although most areas in NC were served by at least one no-cost naloxone program, distribution to rural populations may be limited, indicating a need for increased public investment in no-cost naloxone distribution to populations at greatest risk of overdose.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"volume\":\"41 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jrh.70069\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.70069\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.70069","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是全面确定在北卡罗来纳州免费分发纳洛酮的项目,确定这些项目在哪里和向谁分发纳洛酮,并评估按地理区域报告的纳洛酮分发的差异。方法对社区咨询小组确定的北卡罗来纳州潜在的无成本纳洛酮经销商进行横断面在线调查。采用描述性统计和Fisher精确检验来确定按服务人群(吸毒者、注射吸毒者)和纳洛酮分布地点(农村;城市/郊区)。结果在341个不同项目的受访者中,约有76.5%(241/315)的人报告他们的项目向社区成员分发了免费的纳洛酮。所代表的项目包括卫生部门(n = 81)、治疗项目/中心(n = 59)和注射器服务项目(n = 41)等。项目报告称,纳洛酮最常分发给吸毒者(94.2%)和有物质使用障碍史的人(94.3%)。与城市邮政编码相比,在农村邮政编码的所有患者人群中,无成本纳洛酮分发的频率较低,包括涉及司法的人群(86.4%对98.3%)和离开治疗或排毒的个人(87.9%对98.6%)。结论本研究表明,尽管北卡罗来纳州的大多数地区至少有一个免费纳洛酮项目,但向农村人口的分发可能有限,这表明需要增加公共投资,向用药过量风险最高的人群提供免费纳洛酮。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Examining geographic disparities in access to no-cost naloxone in North Carolina: A cross-sectional survey of naloxone distribution programs

Examining geographic disparities in access to no-cost naloxone in North Carolina: A cross-sectional survey of naloxone distribution programs

Purpose

The objective of this study was to comprehensively identify the programs that distribute naloxone at no-cost in North Carolina, identify where and to whom these programs distribute naloxone, and evaluate disparities in reported naloxone distribution by geographic area.

Methods

A cross-sectional online survey was delivered to potential no-cost naloxone distributors in NC identified by a community advisory panel. Descriptive statistics and Fisher exact tests were utilized to identify disparities in naloxone access by population served (people who use drugs, people who inject drugs) and location of naloxone distribution (rural; urban/suburban).

Results

Approximately 76.5% (241/315) of respondents representing 341 different programs reported that their program(s) distributed no-cost naloxone to community members. Programs represented included health departments (n = 81), treatment programs/centers (n = 59), and syringe service programs(SSPs) (n = 41), among others. Programs reported distributing naloxone most frequently to people who use drugs (94.2%) and people with a substance use disorder history (94.3%). No-cost naloxone distribution was reported less frequently to all patient populations in rural ZIP codes when compared to urban ZIP codes, including justice-involved populations (86.4% vs. 98.3%) and individuals leaving treatment or detox (87.9% vs. 98.6%).

Conclusion

This study indicates that although most areas in NC were served by at least one no-cost naloxone program, distribution to rural populations may be limited, indicating a need for increased public investment in no-cost naloxone distribution to populations at greatest risk of overdose.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信