树形、病害分布和观测几何对苹果树病害谱指数表现的影响

IF 11.4 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Wenjie Zhang , Guijun Yang , Jianbo Qi , Riqiang Chen , Chengjian Zhang , Bo Xu , Baoguo Wu , Xiaohui Su , Chunjiang Zhao
{"title":"树形、病害分布和观测几何对苹果树病害谱指数表现的影响","authors":"Wenjie Zhang ,&nbsp;Guijun Yang ,&nbsp;Jianbo Qi ,&nbsp;Riqiang Chen ,&nbsp;Chengjian Zhang ,&nbsp;Bo Xu ,&nbsp;Baoguo Wu ,&nbsp;Xiaohui Su ,&nbsp;Chunjiang Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.rse.2025.114953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Vegetation indices (VIs) are widely employed in remote sensing for quantitative monitoring of plant disease due to their simplicity and robustness. However, factors such as canopy structure, the distribution of diseases in the canopy, and observation geometry may influence the spectral response of diseased canopies, potentially affecting the performance of VIs developed under specific disease conditions (e.g., early-stage). To date, fewer comprehensive analytical strategy has been proposed to quantitatively assess the confounding effects of multiple factors, which has hindered the selection of optimal VIs for practical disease monitoring. This study proposes an integrated analytical strategy that combines a three-dimensional radiative transfer model (3D RTM) with a multi-criteria decision-making method — entropy-weighted Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) — to systematically evaluate existing disease-related VIs at the canopy scale, based on simulation outputs and ground measurements. We employed the LargE-Scale remote sensing data and image Simulation framework (LESS) to simulate the bidirectional reflectance factor (BRF) of canopies affected by two representative apple diseases, quantitatively evaluated the confounding effects of tree shape, disease distribution and observation geometry on VIs, and systematically ranked the performance of 40 VIs from two critical perspectives. Results from analyses on two disease types showed that Health Index 2014 (HI2014) and Water Band Index in SWIR (WBISWIR) were the top-performing indices for monitoring apple blotch disease (AMB) and apple mosaic disease (MD), respectively, Notably, WBISWIR emerged as the co-optimal index, exhibiting the highest monitoring efficacy across both diseases. Among all indices, the Normalized PRI (PRIn) demonstrated the greatest robustness against variations in tree shapes and disease distributions. WBISWIR exhibited good performance across diverse observation geometries. When comparing the relative influence of three factors on VI performance, tree shape and disease distribution exerted greater effects than observation geometry. Our findings highlight the complex interactions between VIs and confounding factors, emphasizing the necessity of caution when applying disease-related VIs and advocate for comprehensive consideration of tree shape and stress distribution effects during VI selection, especially for early-stage disease detection. This study offers a robust methodological framework for selecting VIs tailored to specific disease and vegetation characteristics, enhancing the precision of remote sensing-based plant disease assessments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":417,"journal":{"name":"Remote Sensing of Environment","volume":"329 ","pages":"Article 114953"},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impacts of tree shape, disease distribution and observation geometry on the performances of disease spectral indices of apple trees\",\"authors\":\"Wenjie Zhang ,&nbsp;Guijun Yang ,&nbsp;Jianbo Qi ,&nbsp;Riqiang Chen ,&nbsp;Chengjian Zhang ,&nbsp;Bo Xu ,&nbsp;Baoguo Wu ,&nbsp;Xiaohui Su ,&nbsp;Chunjiang Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rse.2025.114953\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Vegetation indices (VIs) are widely employed in remote sensing for quantitative monitoring of plant disease due to their simplicity and robustness. However, factors such as canopy structure, the distribution of diseases in the canopy, and observation geometry may influence the spectral response of diseased canopies, potentially affecting the performance of VIs developed under specific disease conditions (e.g., early-stage). To date, fewer comprehensive analytical strategy has been proposed to quantitatively assess the confounding effects of multiple factors, which has hindered the selection of optimal VIs for practical disease monitoring. This study proposes an integrated analytical strategy that combines a three-dimensional radiative transfer model (3D RTM) with a multi-criteria decision-making method — entropy-weighted Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) — to systematically evaluate existing disease-related VIs at the canopy scale, based on simulation outputs and ground measurements. We employed the LargE-Scale remote sensing data and image Simulation framework (LESS) to simulate the bidirectional reflectance factor (BRF) of canopies affected by two representative apple diseases, quantitatively evaluated the confounding effects of tree shape, disease distribution and observation geometry on VIs, and systematically ranked the performance of 40 VIs from two critical perspectives. Results from analyses on two disease types showed that Health Index 2014 (HI2014) and Water Band Index in SWIR (WBISWIR) were the top-performing indices for monitoring apple blotch disease (AMB) and apple mosaic disease (MD), respectively, Notably, WBISWIR emerged as the co-optimal index, exhibiting the highest monitoring efficacy across both diseases. Among all indices, the Normalized PRI (PRIn) demonstrated the greatest robustness against variations in tree shapes and disease distributions. WBISWIR exhibited good performance across diverse observation geometries. When comparing the relative influence of three factors on VI performance, tree shape and disease distribution exerted greater effects than observation geometry. Our findings highlight the complex interactions between VIs and confounding factors, emphasizing the necessity of caution when applying disease-related VIs and advocate for comprehensive consideration of tree shape and stress distribution effects during VI selection, especially for early-stage disease detection. This study offers a robust methodological framework for selecting VIs tailored to specific disease and vegetation characteristics, enhancing the precision of remote sensing-based plant disease assessments.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Remote Sensing of Environment\",\"volume\":\"329 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114953\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Remote Sensing of Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425725003578\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remote Sensing of Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425725003578","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

植被指数因其简单、鲁棒性好而广泛应用于植物病害的遥感定量监测。然而,诸如冠层结构、疾病在冠层中的分布和观测几何形状等因素可能会影响患病冠层的光谱响应,从而可能影响在特定疾病条件下(例如,早期阶段)开发的VIs的性能。迄今为止,提出的定量评估多因素混杂效应的综合分析策略较少,这阻碍了实际疾病监测中最佳VIs的选择。本研究提出了一种综合分析策略,该策略将三维辐射传输模型(3D RTM)与多准则决策方法-熵加权排序偏好方法(TOPSIS)相结合,基于模拟输出和地面测量,在冠层尺度上系统地评估现有疾病相关VIs。利用大尺度遥感数据和影像模拟框架(LESS)模拟了两种代表性苹果病害影响下的冠层双向反射因子(BRF),定量评价了树形、病害分布和观测几何对VIs的混合效应,并从两个关键角度对40种VIs的表现进行了系统排名。结果表明,健康指数2014 (HI2014)和水带指数SWIR (WBISWIR)分别是监测苹果斑病(AMB)和苹果花叶病(MD)的最佳指标,其中WBISWIR为共优指标,对两种病害的监测效果均最高。在所有指数中,归一化PRI (PRIn)对树木形状和疾病分布的变化表现出最大的稳健性。WBISWIR在不同的观测几何上表现出良好的性能。在比较三种因素对VI性能的相对影响时,树木形状和病害分布比观察几何形状的影响更大。我们的研究结果强调了VIs与混杂因素之间复杂的相互作用,强调了在应用与疾病相关的VIs时必须谨慎,并主张在选择VI时综合考虑树形和应力分布的影响,特别是在早期疾病检测中。该研究为选择适合特定疾病和植被特征的VIs提供了一个强大的方法框架,提高了基于遥感的植物病害评估的精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impacts of tree shape, disease distribution and observation geometry on the performances of disease spectral indices of apple trees
Vegetation indices (VIs) are widely employed in remote sensing for quantitative monitoring of plant disease due to their simplicity and robustness. However, factors such as canopy structure, the distribution of diseases in the canopy, and observation geometry may influence the spectral response of diseased canopies, potentially affecting the performance of VIs developed under specific disease conditions (e.g., early-stage). To date, fewer comprehensive analytical strategy has been proposed to quantitatively assess the confounding effects of multiple factors, which has hindered the selection of optimal VIs for practical disease monitoring. This study proposes an integrated analytical strategy that combines a three-dimensional radiative transfer model (3D RTM) with a multi-criteria decision-making method — entropy-weighted Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) — to systematically evaluate existing disease-related VIs at the canopy scale, based on simulation outputs and ground measurements. We employed the LargE-Scale remote sensing data and image Simulation framework (LESS) to simulate the bidirectional reflectance factor (BRF) of canopies affected by two representative apple diseases, quantitatively evaluated the confounding effects of tree shape, disease distribution and observation geometry on VIs, and systematically ranked the performance of 40 VIs from two critical perspectives. Results from analyses on two disease types showed that Health Index 2014 (HI2014) and Water Band Index in SWIR (WBISWIR) were the top-performing indices for monitoring apple blotch disease (AMB) and apple mosaic disease (MD), respectively, Notably, WBISWIR emerged as the co-optimal index, exhibiting the highest monitoring efficacy across both diseases. Among all indices, the Normalized PRI (PRIn) demonstrated the greatest robustness against variations in tree shapes and disease distributions. WBISWIR exhibited good performance across diverse observation geometries. When comparing the relative influence of three factors on VI performance, tree shape and disease distribution exerted greater effects than observation geometry. Our findings highlight the complex interactions between VIs and confounding factors, emphasizing the necessity of caution when applying disease-related VIs and advocate for comprehensive consideration of tree shape and stress distribution effects during VI selection, especially for early-stage disease detection. This study offers a robust methodological framework for selecting VIs tailored to specific disease and vegetation characteristics, enhancing the precision of remote sensing-based plant disease assessments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Remote Sensing of Environment
Remote Sensing of Environment 环境科学-成像科学与照相技术
CiteScore
25.10
自引率
8.90%
发文量
455
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Remote Sensing of Environment (RSE) serves the Earth observation community by disseminating results on the theory, science, applications, and technology that contribute to advancing the field of remote sensing. With a thoroughly interdisciplinary approach, RSE encompasses terrestrial, oceanic, and atmospheric sensing. The journal emphasizes biophysical and quantitative approaches to remote sensing at local to global scales, covering a diverse range of applications and techniques. RSE serves as a vital platform for the exchange of knowledge and advancements in the dynamic field of remote sensing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信