从一般和具体的亲环境行为到气候友好选择和政策接受的溢出效应:心理参与的中介作用

IF 7 1区 心理学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
John Thøgersen , Ting Zhang
{"title":"从一般和具体的亲环境行为到气候友好选择和政策接受的溢出效应:心理参与的中介作用","authors":"John Thøgersen ,&nbsp;Ting Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research on pro-environmental transformations of the consumption pattern has investigated the dynamics of “behavioral spillover” in the form of either a specific pro-environmental behavior triggering another or as the gradual emergence of an increasingly pro-environmental pattern of behavior reflecting increasing environmental commitment. In this article, we draw on consumer engagement research to combine and compare these two approaches, also contributing to the scant research on consumer engagement in climate change and related issues. Specifically, we study impacts of consumers’ use of public transport, cycling, and general pro-environmental behavior on their willingness to adopt new, more climate-friendly transport and travel options and accept new climate-friendly transport policy, including possible mediation through psychological environmental engagement and pro-environmental self-identity. Residents of Denmark (N<sub>wave1</sub> = 537, N<sub>wave2</sub> = 413) and China (N = 1020) were surveyed, and structural equation modelling was used to analyze the data. The study reveals that general pro-environmental behavior increases the willingness to adopt new climate-friendly transport and travel options and acceptance of climate policy regulating transport, partly mediated through psychological environmental engagement, in both Denmark and China. There are only small and scattered impacts of the use of public transport and cycling on psychological environmental engagement or the willingness to adopt or accept. These findings suggest that companies and policymakers should focus more on promoting and facilitating general pro-environmental behavior than on identifying specific behaviors that can be used as “wedges” to promote the adoption and acceptance of new and emerging climate-friendly products, services, and policy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 102718"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spillover from general and specific pro-environmental behavior to climate-friendly choices and policy Acceptance: The mediating role of psychological engagement\",\"authors\":\"John Thøgersen ,&nbsp;Ting Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102718\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Research on pro-environmental transformations of the consumption pattern has investigated the dynamics of “behavioral spillover” in the form of either a specific pro-environmental behavior triggering another or as the gradual emergence of an increasingly pro-environmental pattern of behavior reflecting increasing environmental commitment. In this article, we draw on consumer engagement research to combine and compare these two approaches, also contributing to the scant research on consumer engagement in climate change and related issues. Specifically, we study impacts of consumers’ use of public transport, cycling, and general pro-environmental behavior on their willingness to adopt new, more climate-friendly transport and travel options and accept new climate-friendly transport policy, including possible mediation through psychological environmental engagement and pro-environmental self-identity. Residents of Denmark (N<sub>wave1</sub> = 537, N<sub>wave2</sub> = 413) and China (N = 1020) were surveyed, and structural equation modelling was used to analyze the data. The study reveals that general pro-environmental behavior increases the willingness to adopt new climate-friendly transport and travel options and acceptance of climate policy regulating transport, partly mediated through psychological environmental engagement, in both Denmark and China. There are only small and scattered impacts of the use of public transport and cycling on psychological environmental engagement or the willingness to adopt or accept. These findings suggest that companies and policymakers should focus more on promoting and facilitating general pro-environmental behavior than on identifying specific behaviors that can be used as “wedges” to promote the adoption and acceptance of new and emerging climate-friendly products, services, and policy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"volume\":\"106 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102718\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002014\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002014","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对消费模式的亲环境转变的研究考察了“行为溢出”的动态,其形式要么是特定的亲环境行为引发另一种行为,要么是反映日益增加的环境承诺的日益亲环境的行为模式的逐渐出现。在本文中,我们利用消费者参与研究来结合和比较这两种方法,也为消费者参与气候变化和相关问题的研究做出了贡献。具体而言,我们研究了消费者使用公共交通、骑自行车和一般亲环境行为对他们采用新的、更气候友好的交通和出行选择以及接受新的气候友好型交通政策的意愿的影响,包括通过心理环境参与和亲环境自我认同可能起到的中介作用。对丹麦(Nwave1 = 537, Nwave2 = 413)和中国(N = 1020)的居民进行调查,采用结构方程模型对数据进行分析。研究表明,在丹麦和中国,一般的亲环境行为增加了采用新的气候友好型交通和旅行选择的意愿,以及对调节交通的气候政策的接受程度,这在一定程度上是由心理环境参与介导的。使用公共交通和骑自行车对心理环境参与或接受或接受的意愿只有小而分散的影响。这些发现表明,公司和政策制定者应该更多地关注促进和促进一般的亲环境行为,而不是确定可以作为“楔子”的具体行为,以促进采用和接受新的和新兴的气候友好型产品、服务和政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Spillover from general and specific pro-environmental behavior to climate-friendly choices and policy Acceptance: The mediating role of psychological engagement
Research on pro-environmental transformations of the consumption pattern has investigated the dynamics of “behavioral spillover” in the form of either a specific pro-environmental behavior triggering another or as the gradual emergence of an increasingly pro-environmental pattern of behavior reflecting increasing environmental commitment. In this article, we draw on consumer engagement research to combine and compare these two approaches, also contributing to the scant research on consumer engagement in climate change and related issues. Specifically, we study impacts of consumers’ use of public transport, cycling, and general pro-environmental behavior on their willingness to adopt new, more climate-friendly transport and travel options and accept new climate-friendly transport policy, including possible mediation through psychological environmental engagement and pro-environmental self-identity. Residents of Denmark (Nwave1 = 537, Nwave2 = 413) and China (N = 1020) were surveyed, and structural equation modelling was used to analyze the data. The study reveals that general pro-environmental behavior increases the willingness to adopt new climate-friendly transport and travel options and acceptance of climate policy regulating transport, partly mediated through psychological environmental engagement, in both Denmark and China. There are only small and scattered impacts of the use of public transport and cycling on psychological environmental engagement or the willingness to adopt or accept. These findings suggest that companies and policymakers should focus more on promoting and facilitating general pro-environmental behavior than on identifying specific behaviors that can be used as “wedges” to promote the adoption and acceptance of new and emerging climate-friendly products, services, and policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
140
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信