澳大利亚土著人口的资本股骨骺滑动。

IF 3.1 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Jonghoo Sung, Tim Cheok, Rajendra Shetty, Kanishka Williams, Jaideep Rawat
{"title":"澳大利亚土著人口的资本股骨骺滑动。","authors":"Jonghoo Sung, Tim Cheok, Rajendra Shetty, Kanishka Williams, Jaideep Rawat","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.68.BJO-2025-0040.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to examine the epidemiology and outcomes of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) in Australian Indigenous populations, and risk factors of contralateral slip.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre, retrospective study included 85 Australian Indigenous patients with SCFE from two Northern Territory hospitals between February 2010 and February 2024. Data such as age, posterior slope angle, and slip characteristics were collected. Risk factors for contralateral slip were identified via penalized logistic regression, and the number needed to treat (NNT) was calculated for prophylactic fixation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age at diagnosis was 12. 1 years (IQR 11.2 to 13.0), with a high incidence of valgus slips (10.6%). In total, 73 patients (85.9%) did not have prophylactic contralateral hip pinning, of which 13 patients (17.80%) developed a contralateral slip, with younger age and elevated posterior slope angle as significant risk factors. Patients aged under 12 years with a posterior slope angle greater than 9° had a NNT of two for prophylactic fixation, suggesting targeted benefit. Prophylactic fixation showed no subsequent slip or fixation-related complications in our patient population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SCFE in Australian Indigenous patients presents unique challenges, with a higher proportion of valgus slips than reported in other populations. Prophylactic fixation may be beneficial in younger, high-risk patients. These findings highlight the importance of individualized care and a multidisciplinary approach, particularly in remote communities where healthcare access is limited. Tailored interventions for at-risk individuals may improve outcomes and address healthcare disparities in this vulnerable cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 8","pages":"858-865"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12316491/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Slipped capital femoral epiphysis in an Indigenous Australian population.\",\"authors\":\"Jonghoo Sung, Tim Cheok, Rajendra Shetty, Kanishka Williams, Jaideep Rawat\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/2633-1462.68.BJO-2025-0040.R1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to examine the epidemiology and outcomes of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) in Australian Indigenous populations, and risk factors of contralateral slip.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre, retrospective study included 85 Australian Indigenous patients with SCFE from two Northern Territory hospitals between February 2010 and February 2024. Data such as age, posterior slope angle, and slip characteristics were collected. Risk factors for contralateral slip were identified via penalized logistic regression, and the number needed to treat (NNT) was calculated for prophylactic fixation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age at diagnosis was 12. 1 years (IQR 11.2 to 13.0), with a high incidence of valgus slips (10.6%). In total, 73 patients (85.9%) did not have prophylactic contralateral hip pinning, of which 13 patients (17.80%) developed a contralateral slip, with younger age and elevated posterior slope angle as significant risk factors. Patients aged under 12 years with a posterior slope angle greater than 9° had a NNT of two for prophylactic fixation, suggesting targeted benefit. Prophylactic fixation showed no subsequent slip or fixation-related complications in our patient population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SCFE in Australian Indigenous patients presents unique challenges, with a higher proportion of valgus slips than reported in other populations. Prophylactic fixation may be beneficial in younger, high-risk patients. These findings highlight the importance of individualized care and a multidisciplinary approach, particularly in remote communities where healthcare access is limited. Tailored interventions for at-risk individuals may improve outcomes and address healthcare disparities in this vulnerable cohort.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"volume\":\"6 8\",\"pages\":\"858-865\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12316491/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.68.BJO-2025-0040.R1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.68.BJO-2025-0040.R1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是研究澳大利亚土著人群中股骨头骨骺滑动(SCFE)的流行病学和结果,以及对侧滑动的危险因素。方法:这项多中心回顾性研究纳入了2010年2月至2024年2月期间来自北领地两家医院的85名澳大利亚土著SCFE患者。收集年龄、后坡角、滑移特征等数据。通过惩罚逻辑回归确定对侧滑动的危险因素,并计算需要治疗的数量(NNT)以进行预防性固定。结果:诊断时中位年龄为12岁。1年(IQR 11.2 ~ 13.0),外翻滑移发生率高(10.6%)。73例(85.9%)患者未进行对侧预防性髋部固定,其中13例(17.80%)患者发生对侧滑移,年龄偏小、后斜角升高是重要危险因素。12岁以下后斜角大于9°的患者预防性固定NNT为2,提示有针对性的获益。在我们的患者群体中,预防性固定没有出现随后的滑动或固定相关并发症。结论:SCFE在澳大利亚土著患者提出了独特的挑战,外翻滑的比例高于其他人群。预防性固定可能对年轻、高危患者有益。这些发现强调了个性化护理和多学科方法的重要性,特别是在医疗保健机会有限的偏远社区。针对高危人群的量身定制的干预措施可能会改善结果,并解决这一弱势群体的医疗保健差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis in an Indigenous Australian population.

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis in an Indigenous Australian population.

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis in an Indigenous Australian population.

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis in an Indigenous Australian population.

Aims: The aim of this study was to examine the epidemiology and outcomes of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) in Australian Indigenous populations, and risk factors of contralateral slip.

Methods: This multicentre, retrospective study included 85 Australian Indigenous patients with SCFE from two Northern Territory hospitals between February 2010 and February 2024. Data such as age, posterior slope angle, and slip characteristics were collected. Risk factors for contralateral slip were identified via penalized logistic regression, and the number needed to treat (NNT) was calculated for prophylactic fixation.

Results: The median age at diagnosis was 12. 1 years (IQR 11.2 to 13.0), with a high incidence of valgus slips (10.6%). In total, 73 patients (85.9%) did not have prophylactic contralateral hip pinning, of which 13 patients (17.80%) developed a contralateral slip, with younger age and elevated posterior slope angle as significant risk factors. Patients aged under 12 years with a posterior slope angle greater than 9° had a NNT of two for prophylactic fixation, suggesting targeted benefit. Prophylactic fixation showed no subsequent slip or fixation-related complications in our patient population.

Conclusion: SCFE in Australian Indigenous patients presents unique challenges, with a higher proportion of valgus slips than reported in other populations. Prophylactic fixation may be beneficial in younger, high-risk patients. These findings highlight the importance of individualized care and a multidisciplinary approach, particularly in remote communities where healthcare access is limited. Tailored interventions for at-risk individuals may improve outcomes and address healthcare disparities in this vulnerable cohort.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Open
Bone & Joint Open ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信