{"title":"使用ΦX174噬菌体的Meissner的SepraPor®中空纤维超滤50 kDa和500 kDa滤膜的小病毒清除率和流量的比较:在PDA Week 2025上发表的海报","authors":"Zachary Bendiks, Mao Kohara, Leesa McBurnie","doi":"10.5731/pdajpst.2025.25406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Viral clearance by virus-retentive filters is a crucial step in many biomanufacturing process streams, including production of monoclonal antibodies and cell culture media. Studies with model viruses or bacteriophage are needed to determine whether a specific filter should be categorized as a small or large virus retentive filter. In this study, viral retention and flowrates were compared between Meissner's 50 kDa and 500 kDa SepraPor® Hollow Fiber (HF) Ultrafiltration (UF) membranes used for Tangential Flow Filtration (TFF). These filters were challenged with ∼10 million plaque forming units (PFU) of the small bacteriophage ΦX174 suspended in deionized (DI) water. It was determined that the 50 kDa SepraPor® HF UF membranes gave log-reduction values (LRVs) ≥ 5 with flowrates ranging from 15.9 to 46.7 mL/min at 15 psi constant pressure. The 500 kDa SepraPor® HF UF membranes gave LRVs ≤ 0.74 with flowrates ranging from 8.8 to 286 mL/min. These results show that Meissner's 500 kDa SepraPor® filter membrane does not retain ΦX174 in water and does not function as a small virus retentive filter, while the 50 kDa SepraPor® filter membrane gives robust clearance of ΦX174 and can be categorized as a small virus retentive filter.</p>","PeriodicalId":19986,"journal":{"name":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","volume":"79 4","pages":"434-435"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Small Virus Clearance and Flowrates Between Meissner's SepraPor<sup>®</sup> Hollow Fiber Ultrafiltration 50 kDa and 500 kDa Filter Membranes Using ΦX174 Bacteriophage: Poster Presented at PDA Week 2025.\",\"authors\":\"Zachary Bendiks, Mao Kohara, Leesa McBurnie\",\"doi\":\"10.5731/pdajpst.2025.25406\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Viral clearance by virus-retentive filters is a crucial step in many biomanufacturing process streams, including production of monoclonal antibodies and cell culture media. Studies with model viruses or bacteriophage are needed to determine whether a specific filter should be categorized as a small or large virus retentive filter. In this study, viral retention and flowrates were compared between Meissner's 50 kDa and 500 kDa SepraPor® Hollow Fiber (HF) Ultrafiltration (UF) membranes used for Tangential Flow Filtration (TFF). These filters were challenged with ∼10 million plaque forming units (PFU) of the small bacteriophage ΦX174 suspended in deionized (DI) water. It was determined that the 50 kDa SepraPor® HF UF membranes gave log-reduction values (LRVs) ≥ 5 with flowrates ranging from 15.9 to 46.7 mL/min at 15 psi constant pressure. The 500 kDa SepraPor® HF UF membranes gave LRVs ≤ 0.74 with flowrates ranging from 8.8 to 286 mL/min. These results show that Meissner's 500 kDa SepraPor® filter membrane does not retain ΦX174 in water and does not function as a small virus retentive filter, while the 50 kDa SepraPor® filter membrane gives robust clearance of ΦX174 and can be categorized as a small virus retentive filter.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"79 4\",\"pages\":\"434-435\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2025.25406\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2025.25406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Small Virus Clearance and Flowrates Between Meissner's SepraPor® Hollow Fiber Ultrafiltration 50 kDa and 500 kDa Filter Membranes Using ΦX174 Bacteriophage: Poster Presented at PDA Week 2025.
Viral clearance by virus-retentive filters is a crucial step in many biomanufacturing process streams, including production of monoclonal antibodies and cell culture media. Studies with model viruses or bacteriophage are needed to determine whether a specific filter should be categorized as a small or large virus retentive filter. In this study, viral retention and flowrates were compared between Meissner's 50 kDa and 500 kDa SepraPor® Hollow Fiber (HF) Ultrafiltration (UF) membranes used for Tangential Flow Filtration (TFF). These filters were challenged with ∼10 million plaque forming units (PFU) of the small bacteriophage ΦX174 suspended in deionized (DI) water. It was determined that the 50 kDa SepraPor® HF UF membranes gave log-reduction values (LRVs) ≥ 5 with flowrates ranging from 15.9 to 46.7 mL/min at 15 psi constant pressure. The 500 kDa SepraPor® HF UF membranes gave LRVs ≤ 0.74 with flowrates ranging from 8.8 to 286 mL/min. These results show that Meissner's 500 kDa SepraPor® filter membrane does not retain ΦX174 in water and does not function as a small virus retentive filter, while the 50 kDa SepraPor® filter membrane gives robust clearance of ΦX174 and can be categorized as a small virus retentive filter.