{"title":"保险公司规模和协商医院价格:来自阿肯色州平价医疗法案的见解。","authors":"Jee-Hun Choi","doi":"10.1002/hec.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper examines the role of insurer size in price negotiations between commercial health insurers and hospitals in the United States. The empirical analysis focuses on a dominant insurer in the Arkansas individual health insurance market that experienced a size increase due to a policy change. Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), Arkansas expanded its Medicaid program, but unlike other expansion states, it used individual plans—a private insurance option generally not designed for Medicaid—to provide coverage to newly insured beneficiaries. This unique policy nearly doubled the insurer's individual plan enrollment after the ACA was implemented. Admission-level regression analysis reveals that the insurer's hospital inpatient prices for individual plans decreased by 16.7% following the expansion. Consistent with the predictions from bargaining models, the findings suggest that the insurer's increased bargaining leverage due to its larger size is the primary mechanism behind the price reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":12847,"journal":{"name":"Health economics","volume":"34 11","pages":"2097-2113"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hec.70022","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insurer Size and Negotiated Hospital Prices: Insights From the Affordable Care Act in Arkansas\",\"authors\":\"Jee-Hun Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hec.70022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper examines the role of insurer size in price negotiations between commercial health insurers and hospitals in the United States. The empirical analysis focuses on a dominant insurer in the Arkansas individual health insurance market that experienced a size increase due to a policy change. Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), Arkansas expanded its Medicaid program, but unlike other expansion states, it used individual plans—a private insurance option generally not designed for Medicaid—to provide coverage to newly insured beneficiaries. This unique policy nearly doubled the insurer's individual plan enrollment after the ACA was implemented. Admission-level regression analysis reveals that the insurer's hospital inpatient prices for individual plans decreased by 16.7% following the expansion. Consistent with the predictions from bargaining models, the findings suggest that the insurer's increased bargaining leverage due to its larger size is the primary mechanism behind the price reduction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health economics\",\"volume\":\"34 11\",\"pages\":\"2097-2113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hec.70022\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hec.70022\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hec.70022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Insurer Size and Negotiated Hospital Prices: Insights From the Affordable Care Act in Arkansas
This paper examines the role of insurer size in price negotiations between commercial health insurers and hospitals in the United States. The empirical analysis focuses on a dominant insurer in the Arkansas individual health insurance market that experienced a size increase due to a policy change. Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), Arkansas expanded its Medicaid program, but unlike other expansion states, it used individual plans—a private insurance option generally not designed for Medicaid—to provide coverage to newly insured beneficiaries. This unique policy nearly doubled the insurer's individual plan enrollment after the ACA was implemented. Admission-level regression analysis reveals that the insurer's hospital inpatient prices for individual plans decreased by 16.7% following the expansion. Consistent with the predictions from bargaining models, the findings suggest that the insurer's increased bargaining leverage due to its larger size is the primary mechanism behind the price reduction.
期刊介绍:
This Journal publishes articles on all aspects of health economics: theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy from the economic perspective. Its scope includes the determinants of health and its definition and valuation, as well as the demand for and supply of health care; planning and market mechanisms; micro-economic evaluation of individual procedures and treatments; and evaluation of the performance of health care systems.
Contributions should typically be original and innovative. As a rule, the Journal does not include routine applications of cost-effectiveness analysis, discrete choice experiments and costing analyses.
Editorials are regular features, these should be concise and topical. Occasionally commissioned reviews are published and special issues bring together contributions on a single topic. Health Economics Letters facilitate rapid exchange of views on topical issues. Contributions related to problems in both developed and developing countries are welcome.