基于药物计量学模型的多区域2期试验中感兴趣区域的样本量分配:一种抗银屑病药物的案例研究

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Xiao Zhang, Yubo Xiao, Junyi Wu, Scott Marshall, Xuan Zhou
{"title":"基于药物计量学模型的多区域2期试验中感兴趣区域的样本量分配:一种抗银屑病药物的案例研究","authors":"Xiao Zhang, Yubo Xiao, Junyi Wu, Scott Marshall, Xuan Zhou","doi":"10.1002/psp4.70090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Phase 2 trials have historically focused on characterizing the dose-exposure-response relationship in relatively homogeneous patient populations before proceeding to confirmatory trials. However, with the rise of multi-regional Phase 2 trials, it is important to strike a balance between this goal and the requirement to make sure that the optimal doses are chosen for patients from various geographic areas. This study uses a dose-ranging trial for an anti-psoriatic drug, featuring a typical design with a total sample size of N = 175, to highlight key considerations regarding sample size in multi-regional exploratory studies. The allocation of sample size to a region of interest (Region X) was evaluated using both a conventional statistical approach and a pharmacometric model-based (PMx) approach, predicated on the assumption of a minimum treatment improvement in Region X. Further evaluation was performed to assess the probability of reaching reliable conclusions regarding clinically relevant inter-regional differences in treatment response. The statistical approach, relying solely on end-of-trial observations from a single dose group, exhibited a maximum power of less than 40% in detecting treatment differences across regions when Region X accounts for 50% of the total sample size. In contrast, the PMx approach, employing data from multiple dose groups across trial duration, demonstrated that 26% of the total sample size yielded over 80% power to identify the inter-regional difference. The PMx approach has also been shown to offer a more efficient characterization of the clinical relevance of inter-regional differences, and has potential to improve decision-making in development progression by integrating prior knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacometric Model-Based Sample Size Allocation for a Region of Interest in a Multi-Regional Phase 2 Trial: A Case Study of an Anti-Psoriatic Drug.\",\"authors\":\"Xiao Zhang, Yubo Xiao, Junyi Wu, Scott Marshall, Xuan Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/psp4.70090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Phase 2 trials have historically focused on characterizing the dose-exposure-response relationship in relatively homogeneous patient populations before proceeding to confirmatory trials. However, with the rise of multi-regional Phase 2 trials, it is important to strike a balance between this goal and the requirement to make sure that the optimal doses are chosen for patients from various geographic areas. This study uses a dose-ranging trial for an anti-psoriatic drug, featuring a typical design with a total sample size of N = 175, to highlight key considerations regarding sample size in multi-regional exploratory studies. The allocation of sample size to a region of interest (Region X) was evaluated using both a conventional statistical approach and a pharmacometric model-based (PMx) approach, predicated on the assumption of a minimum treatment improvement in Region X. Further evaluation was performed to assess the probability of reaching reliable conclusions regarding clinically relevant inter-regional differences in treatment response. The statistical approach, relying solely on end-of-trial observations from a single dose group, exhibited a maximum power of less than 40% in detecting treatment differences across regions when Region X accounts for 50% of the total sample size. In contrast, the PMx approach, employing data from multiple dose groups across trial duration, demonstrated that 26% of the total sample size yielded over 80% power to identify the inter-regional difference. The PMx approach has also been shown to offer a more efficient characterization of the clinical relevance of inter-regional differences, and has potential to improve decision-making in development progression by integrating prior knowledge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.70090\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.70090","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在进行确证性试验之前,2期试验历来侧重于在相对均匀的患者群体中描述剂量-暴露-反应关系。然而,随着多地区二期试验的兴起,在这一目标和确保为不同地理区域的患者选择最佳剂量的要求之间取得平衡是很重要的。本研究采用一种抗银屑病药物的剂量范围试验,采用典型设计,总样本量为N = 175,以突出多区域探索性研究中样本量的关键考虑因素。使用传统统计方法和基于药物计量模型(PMx)的方法对感兴趣的区域(X区域)的样本量分配进行评估,该方法假设X区域的治疗改善最小,并进行进一步评估,以评估就临床相关的区域间治疗反应差异得出可靠结论的可能性。当X地区占总样本量的50%时,统计方法仅依赖于单一剂量组的试验结束观察结果,在检测不同地区治疗差异方面显示出不到40%的最大功率。相比之下,PMx方法在整个试验期间采用来自多个剂量组的数据,表明总样本量的26%产生了超过80%的能力来识别区域间差异。PMx方法也被证明可以更有效地描述区域间差异的临床相关性,并有可能通过整合先验知识来改善发展进程中的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pharmacometric Model-Based Sample Size Allocation for a Region of Interest in a Multi-Regional Phase 2 Trial: A Case Study of an Anti-Psoriatic Drug.

Phase 2 trials have historically focused on characterizing the dose-exposure-response relationship in relatively homogeneous patient populations before proceeding to confirmatory trials. However, with the rise of multi-regional Phase 2 trials, it is important to strike a balance between this goal and the requirement to make sure that the optimal doses are chosen for patients from various geographic areas. This study uses a dose-ranging trial for an anti-psoriatic drug, featuring a typical design with a total sample size of N = 175, to highlight key considerations regarding sample size in multi-regional exploratory studies. The allocation of sample size to a region of interest (Region X) was evaluated using both a conventional statistical approach and a pharmacometric model-based (PMx) approach, predicated on the assumption of a minimum treatment improvement in Region X. Further evaluation was performed to assess the probability of reaching reliable conclusions regarding clinically relevant inter-regional differences in treatment response. The statistical approach, relying solely on end-of-trial observations from a single dose group, exhibited a maximum power of less than 40% in detecting treatment differences across regions when Region X accounts for 50% of the total sample size. In contrast, the PMx approach, employing data from multiple dose groups across trial duration, demonstrated that 26% of the total sample size yielded over 80% power to identify the inter-regional difference. The PMx approach has also been shown to offer a more efficient characterization of the clinical relevance of inter-regional differences, and has potential to improve decision-making in development progression by integrating prior knowledge.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
11.40%
发文量
146
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信