{"title":"在选定的欧洲国家和美国生物仿制药的个人处方激励:范围文献综述。","authors":"Félix Lobo, Isabel Río-Álvarez, Ángeles Flores","doi":"10.1007/s40259-025-00736-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The uptake of biosimilar medicines in Europe and the USA remains highly variable and at times slow, despite the significant potential for cost savings for both patients and healthcare systems. One of the most recommended measures to address this issue is the use of prescribing incentives. On the basis of a well-defined concept of individual prescribing incentives, we conducted a scoping literature review aimed at exploring their role in promoting the uptake of biosimilars in six countries with advanced healthcare systems (the USA, Denmark, England, Italy, France and Germany), with a particular focus on gain-sharing initiatives. Online databases and other sources were used to identify papers published between 2010 and 2023, resulting in the selection of 47 publications. The results suggest that there are few real-world programmes that use provider incentives offered by health systems to encourage prescribing of biosimilars. However, we found gain-sharing schemes of particular interest in England, Italy, France and Germany, where savings are reinvested to improve the quality of care, incentivizing physicians and raising satisfaction, but without financial rewards. In contrast, we found unplanned disincentives hindering the uptake of biosimilars in the USA, as well as very successful top-down strategies that do not rely on individual incentives, including centralized procurement in Denmark, although it remains to be seen whether the success is idiosyncratic to its specific circumstances. In addition, the hypothesis that gain-sharing initiatives with the aforementioned characteristics are more adaptable to different cultural, organizational and political settings to promote biosimilar prescribing merits further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"777-791"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individual Prescribing Incentives for Biosimilars in Selected European Countries and the USA: a Scoping Literature Review.\",\"authors\":\"Félix Lobo, Isabel Río-Álvarez, Ángeles Flores\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40259-025-00736-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The uptake of biosimilar medicines in Europe and the USA remains highly variable and at times slow, despite the significant potential for cost savings for both patients and healthcare systems. One of the most recommended measures to address this issue is the use of prescribing incentives. On the basis of a well-defined concept of individual prescribing incentives, we conducted a scoping literature review aimed at exploring their role in promoting the uptake of biosimilars in six countries with advanced healthcare systems (the USA, Denmark, England, Italy, France and Germany), with a particular focus on gain-sharing initiatives. Online databases and other sources were used to identify papers published between 2010 and 2023, resulting in the selection of 47 publications. The results suggest that there are few real-world programmes that use provider incentives offered by health systems to encourage prescribing of biosimilars. However, we found gain-sharing schemes of particular interest in England, Italy, France and Germany, where savings are reinvested to improve the quality of care, incentivizing physicians and raising satisfaction, but without financial rewards. In contrast, we found unplanned disincentives hindering the uptake of biosimilars in the USA, as well as very successful top-down strategies that do not rely on individual incentives, including centralized procurement in Denmark, although it remains to be seen whether the success is idiosyncratic to its specific circumstances. In addition, the hypothesis that gain-sharing initiatives with the aforementioned characteristics are more adaptable to different cultural, organizational and political settings to promote biosimilar prescribing merits further research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BioDrugs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"777-791\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BioDrugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40259-025-00736-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioDrugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40259-025-00736-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Individual Prescribing Incentives for Biosimilars in Selected European Countries and the USA: a Scoping Literature Review.
The uptake of biosimilar medicines in Europe and the USA remains highly variable and at times slow, despite the significant potential for cost savings for both patients and healthcare systems. One of the most recommended measures to address this issue is the use of prescribing incentives. On the basis of a well-defined concept of individual prescribing incentives, we conducted a scoping literature review aimed at exploring their role in promoting the uptake of biosimilars in six countries with advanced healthcare systems (the USA, Denmark, England, Italy, France and Germany), with a particular focus on gain-sharing initiatives. Online databases and other sources were used to identify papers published between 2010 and 2023, resulting in the selection of 47 publications. The results suggest that there are few real-world programmes that use provider incentives offered by health systems to encourage prescribing of biosimilars. However, we found gain-sharing schemes of particular interest in England, Italy, France and Germany, where savings are reinvested to improve the quality of care, incentivizing physicians and raising satisfaction, but without financial rewards. In contrast, we found unplanned disincentives hindering the uptake of biosimilars in the USA, as well as very successful top-down strategies that do not rely on individual incentives, including centralized procurement in Denmark, although it remains to be seen whether the success is idiosyncratic to its specific circumstances. In addition, the hypothesis that gain-sharing initiatives with the aforementioned characteristics are more adaptable to different cultural, organizational and political settings to promote biosimilar prescribing merits further research.
期刊介绍:
An essential resource for R&D professionals and clinicians with an interest in biologic therapies.
BioDrugs covers the development and therapeutic application of biotechnology-based pharmaceuticals and diagnostic products for the treatment of human disease.
BioDrugs offers a range of additional enhanced features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist patients, caregivers and others in understanding important medical advances. The journal also provides the option to include various other types of enhanced features including slide sets, videos and animations. All enhanced features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. Peer review is conducted using Editorial Manager®, supported by a database of international experts. This database is shared with other Adis journals.