超越急诊科:流动健康出院干预措施的使用-范围审查。

IF 2
CJEM Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1007/s43678-025-00932-3
Courtney Price, Omar Anjum, Maxim Ben-Yakov, Ani Orchanian-Cheff, Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy
{"title":"超越急诊科:流动健康出院干预措施的使用-范围审查。","authors":"Courtney Price, Omar Anjum, Maxim Ben-Yakov, Ani Orchanian-Cheff, Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy","doi":"10.1007/s43678-025-00932-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Mobile health interventions can enhance post-emergency department (ED) care by improving care transitions and optimizing patient follow-up, yet their utility remains underexplored. Our objective was to review mobile health discharge interventions from the ED and to characterize these interventions by technology types, patient and clinical populations studied, and outcomes assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a scoping review of mobile health interventions supporting post-ED care following Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Four databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central and Systematic Reviews) were searched for studies in English from 2007 to 2024. Included studies were mobile health interventions administered within ED settings focused on the clinical encounter. Abstract and full-text screening were performed by two independent reviewers. Data were charted by technology type, intended clinical use, and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 4,313 records identified, 43 studies were included. Most articles were published between 2021 and 2024 (28, 65%), were pilot studies (18, 42%) and in single academic site with adult patients. Technologies included text messaging (18, 42%), remote patient monitoring (16, 37%), and mobile phone applications (9, 21%). Common conditions studied included respiratory disease (12, 28%), general post-ED care across all presenting complaints (8, 19%), and infectious disease (6, 14%). Among primary outcomes, health systems outcomes were frequently assessed (18, 42%), followed by feasibility (13, 30%) and clinical outcomes (10, 23%). Across all outcomes, most studies reported improved outpatient follow-up adherence (78%, 7/9) and clinical disease states (54%, 6/11). ED revisit rates varied in the 17 studies that reported it (41% [7] no change, 29% [5] reduced, 29% [5] no comparator group).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mobile health interventions have been introduced to support post-ED care with emerging, yet limited evidence of their impact on ED revisit rates, follow-up care, and enhanced clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":"729-743"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond the emergency department: the use of mobile health discharge interventions-a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Courtney Price, Omar Anjum, Maxim Ben-Yakov, Ani Orchanian-Cheff, Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43678-025-00932-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Mobile health interventions can enhance post-emergency department (ED) care by improving care transitions and optimizing patient follow-up, yet their utility remains underexplored. Our objective was to review mobile health discharge interventions from the ED and to characterize these interventions by technology types, patient and clinical populations studied, and outcomes assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a scoping review of mobile health interventions supporting post-ED care following Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Four databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central and Systematic Reviews) were searched for studies in English from 2007 to 2024. Included studies were mobile health interventions administered within ED settings focused on the clinical encounter. Abstract and full-text screening were performed by two independent reviewers. Data were charted by technology type, intended clinical use, and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 4,313 records identified, 43 studies were included. Most articles were published between 2021 and 2024 (28, 65%), were pilot studies (18, 42%) and in single academic site with adult patients. Technologies included text messaging (18, 42%), remote patient monitoring (16, 37%), and mobile phone applications (9, 21%). Common conditions studied included respiratory disease (12, 28%), general post-ED care across all presenting complaints (8, 19%), and infectious disease (6, 14%). Among primary outcomes, health systems outcomes were frequently assessed (18, 42%), followed by feasibility (13, 30%) and clinical outcomes (10, 23%). Across all outcomes, most studies reported improved outpatient follow-up adherence (78%, 7/9) and clinical disease states (54%, 6/11). ED revisit rates varied in the 17 studies that reported it (41% [7] no change, 29% [5] reduced, 29% [5] no comparator group).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mobile health interventions have been introduced to support post-ED care with emerging, yet limited evidence of their impact on ED revisit rates, follow-up care, and enhanced clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CJEM\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"729-743\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CJEM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-025-00932-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-025-00932-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:移动医疗干预可以通过改善护理过渡和优化患者随访来增强急诊后部门(ED)护理,但其效用仍未得到充分探索。我们的目标是回顾急诊科的流动健康出院干预措施,并根据技术类型、所研究的患者和临床人群以及评估的结果来描述这些干预措施。方法:我们按照乔安娜布里格斯研究所和PRISMA扩展范围审查指南,对支持ed后护理的移动卫生干预措施进行了范围审查。四个数据库(Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central和Systematic Reviews)检索了2007年至2024年的英语研究。纳入的研究是在急诊科环境中进行的流动卫生干预,重点是临床接触。摘要和全文筛选由两名独立审稿人进行。数据按技术类型、预期临床用途和结果绘制图表。结果:在确定的4313份记录中,纳入了43项研究。大多数文章发表于2021年至2024年之间(28.65%),是试点研究(18.42%),并且是在单一学术站点发表的成人患者。技术包括短信(18.42%)、远程病人监护(16.37%)和移动电话应用(9.21%)。研究的常见疾病包括呼吸系统疾病(12.28%)、所有主诉的普通急诊后护理(8.19%)和传染病(6.14%)。在主要结果中,经常评估卫生系统结果(18.42%),其次是可行性(13.30%)和临床结果(10.23%)。在所有结果中,大多数研究报告了门诊随访依从性(78%,7/9)和临床疾病状态(54%,6/11)的改善。ED重访率在17项研究中有所不同(41%的[7]没有变化,29%的[5]减少,29%的[5]没有比较组)。结论:移动医疗干预措施已被引入以支持ED后护理,其对ED重访率、随访护理和增强临床结果的影响正在出现,但证据有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond the emergency department: the use of mobile health discharge interventions-a scoping review.

Objectives: Mobile health interventions can enhance post-emergency department (ED) care by improving care transitions and optimizing patient follow-up, yet their utility remains underexplored. Our objective was to review mobile health discharge interventions from the ED and to characterize these interventions by technology types, patient and clinical populations studied, and outcomes assessed.

Methods: We performed a scoping review of mobile health interventions supporting post-ED care following Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Four databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central and Systematic Reviews) were searched for studies in English from 2007 to 2024. Included studies were mobile health interventions administered within ED settings focused on the clinical encounter. Abstract and full-text screening were performed by two independent reviewers. Data were charted by technology type, intended clinical use, and outcomes.

Results: Of 4,313 records identified, 43 studies were included. Most articles were published between 2021 and 2024 (28, 65%), were pilot studies (18, 42%) and in single academic site with adult patients. Technologies included text messaging (18, 42%), remote patient monitoring (16, 37%), and mobile phone applications (9, 21%). Common conditions studied included respiratory disease (12, 28%), general post-ED care across all presenting complaints (8, 19%), and infectious disease (6, 14%). Among primary outcomes, health systems outcomes were frequently assessed (18, 42%), followed by feasibility (13, 30%) and clinical outcomes (10, 23%). Across all outcomes, most studies reported improved outpatient follow-up adherence (78%, 7/9) and clinical disease states (54%, 6/11). ED revisit rates varied in the 17 studies that reported it (41% [7] no change, 29% [5] reduced, 29% [5] no comparator group).

Conclusions: Mobile health interventions have been introduced to support post-ED care with emerging, yet limited evidence of their impact on ED revisit rates, follow-up care, and enhanced clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信