老年人疼痛阈值:性别和慢性非癌性疼痛影响的横断面观察研究

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Áquila Lopes Gouvêa , Pedro Adde Anuardo , João Paulo Consentino Solano , Ângela Maria Sousa , Hazem Adel Ashmawi
{"title":"老年人疼痛阈值:性别和慢性非癌性疼痛影响的横断面观察研究","authors":"Áquila Lopes Gouvêa ,&nbsp;Pedro Adde Anuardo ,&nbsp;João Paulo Consentino Solano ,&nbsp;Ângela Maria Sousa ,&nbsp;Hazem Adel Ashmawi","doi":"10.1016/j.bjane.2025.844665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The older population is growing, and it is estimated that, by 2050, people aged 60-years or more will have reached two billion. The increased life expectancy has led to a higher incidence of chronic degenerative diseases, contributing to increased pain complaints. This study aims to compare the pain threshold after mechanical stimulation in older adults according to gender and presence or absence of chronic pain and find the prevalence and intensity of chronic pain in this population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a cross-sectional observational study with a convenience sample in the outpatient clinic at two research centers. All participants answered sociodemographic and clinical questionnaires, and the Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) was assessed with an algometer. Patients reporting chronic pain answered the Geriatric Pain Measure (GPM) questionnaire.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The sample consisted of 230 individuals, aged 60 to 96 years, 67.8% women and 32.2% men. Chronic pain prevalence was 47.8%, 29.7% in men and 56.4% in women. PPT was significantly lower in women (4.49 ± 1.78 kg) than in men (6.41 ± 1.92 kg). PPT in older individuals presenting chronic pain (4.58 ± 1.93 kg) was lower than in older individuals without chronic pain (5.58 ± 2.01 kg). There was no significant difference between genders in pain assessment by GPM.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Pressure pain threshold was lower in older women and in patients with chronic pain, the association between gender and lower pain threshold was stronger than observed with chronic pain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":32356,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"75 5","pages":"Article 844665"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pain thresholds in elderly individuals: a cross-sectional observational study of the influence of gender and chronic non-cancer pain\",\"authors\":\"Áquila Lopes Gouvêa ,&nbsp;Pedro Adde Anuardo ,&nbsp;João Paulo Consentino Solano ,&nbsp;Ângela Maria Sousa ,&nbsp;Hazem Adel Ashmawi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjane.2025.844665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The older population is growing, and it is estimated that, by 2050, people aged 60-years or more will have reached two billion. The increased life expectancy has led to a higher incidence of chronic degenerative diseases, contributing to increased pain complaints. This study aims to compare the pain threshold after mechanical stimulation in older adults according to gender and presence or absence of chronic pain and find the prevalence and intensity of chronic pain in this population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a cross-sectional observational study with a convenience sample in the outpatient clinic at two research centers. All participants answered sociodemographic and clinical questionnaires, and the Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) was assessed with an algometer. Patients reporting chronic pain answered the Geriatric Pain Measure (GPM) questionnaire.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The sample consisted of 230 individuals, aged 60 to 96 years, 67.8% women and 32.2% men. Chronic pain prevalence was 47.8%, 29.7% in men and 56.4% in women. PPT was significantly lower in women (4.49 ± 1.78 kg) than in men (6.41 ± 1.92 kg). PPT in older individuals presenting chronic pain (4.58 ± 1.93 kg) was lower than in older individuals without chronic pain (5.58 ± 2.01 kg). There was no significant difference between genders in pain assessment by GPM.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Pressure pain threshold was lower in older women and in patients with chronic pain, the association between gender and lower pain threshold was stronger than observed with chronic pain.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"75 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 844665\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001425000818\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001425000818","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:老年人口正在增长,据估计,到2050年,60岁及以上的人口将达到20亿。预期寿命的延长导致慢性退行性疾病的发病率增加,导致疼痛投诉增加。本研究旨在比较老年人机械刺激后的疼痛阈值,根据性别和是否存在慢性疼痛,并发现慢性疼痛在这一人群中的患病率和强度。方法:这是一项横断面观察性研究,在两个研究中心的门诊使用方便样本。所有参与者都回答了社会人口学和临床问卷,并使用疼痛测量仪评估了压力疼痛阈值(PPT)。报告慢性疼痛的患者回答了老年疼痛测量(GPM)问卷。结果:样本包括230人,年龄在60 - 96岁之间,67.8%为女性,32.2%为男性。慢性疼痛患病率为47.8%,男性29.7%,女性56.4%。女性的PPT(4.49±1.78 kg)明显低于男性(6.41±1.92 kg)。有慢性疼痛的老年人PPT(4.58±1.93 kg)低于无慢性疼痛的老年人PPT(5.58±2.01 kg)。用GPM评估疼痛的性别差异无统计学意义。结论:老年女性和慢性疼痛患者的压痛阈值较低,性别与压痛阈值较低的相关性强于慢性疼痛患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pain thresholds in elderly individuals: a cross-sectional observational study of the influence of gender and chronic non-cancer pain

Background

The older population is growing, and it is estimated that, by 2050, people aged 60-years or more will have reached two billion. The increased life expectancy has led to a higher incidence of chronic degenerative diseases, contributing to increased pain complaints. This study aims to compare the pain threshold after mechanical stimulation in older adults according to gender and presence or absence of chronic pain and find the prevalence and intensity of chronic pain in this population.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional observational study with a convenience sample in the outpatient clinic at two research centers. All participants answered sociodemographic and clinical questionnaires, and the Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) was assessed with an algometer. Patients reporting chronic pain answered the Geriatric Pain Measure (GPM) questionnaire.

Results

The sample consisted of 230 individuals, aged 60 to 96 years, 67.8% women and 32.2% men. Chronic pain prevalence was 47.8%, 29.7% in men and 56.4% in women. PPT was significantly lower in women (4.49 ± 1.78 kg) than in men (6.41 ± 1.92 kg). PPT in older individuals presenting chronic pain (4.58 ± 1.93 kg) was lower than in older individuals without chronic pain (5.58 ± 2.01 kg). There was no significant difference between genders in pain assessment by GPM.

Conclusions

Pressure pain threshold was lower in older women and in patients with chronic pain, the association between gender and lower pain threshold was stronger than observed with chronic pain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
68 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信