颅面缺损康复:种植体保留耳、鼻、眶假体的长期疗效- Morriston经验。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Ioan Davies (Speciality Registrar in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery), Andrew Jenkinson (Consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon), Steven Key (Consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon), Peter Llewelyn Evans (Maxillofacial Laboratory Services Manager), Ketan Shah (Consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon), M.A. Kittur (Consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon)
{"title":"颅面缺损康复:种植体保留耳、鼻、眶假体的长期疗效- Morriston经验。","authors":"Ioan Davies (Speciality Registrar in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery),&nbsp;Andrew Jenkinson (Consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon),&nbsp;Steven Key (Consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon),&nbsp;Peter Llewelyn Evans (Maxillofacial Laboratory Services Manager),&nbsp;Ketan Shah (Consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon),&nbsp;M.A. Kittur (Consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon)","doi":"10.1016/j.bjoms.2025.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This retrospective study assessed the long-term outcomes of extraoral craniofacial implants used to support auricular, nasal, and orbital prosthesis in 138 patients treated at Morriston Hospital, Swansea, from 2004 to 2024. A total of 346 implants were reviewed, showing an overall implant survival rate of 91.9% and prosthesis survival rate of 89.6%. Long-term survival rates at 5, 10, and 20 years were highest for ear implants (100%, 90%, and 80%), respectively, followed by nasal (95.2%, 91.8%, and 91.8%) and orbital implants (89%, 86.6%, and 77%), respectively. Radiotherapy was associated with poorer implant survival, with a survival rate of 89.3% in irradiated implants compared with 97% in non-irradiated implants (p = 0.0219). Amongst the irradiated implants, those placed during ablative surgery showed a significantly improved survival rate (92.49%) than those placed following radiotherapy (68.42%, p = 0.0069). Emerging plating systems such as Epitek show promise in providing alternative nasal prosthesis retention but require further long-term follow up. The above findings underscore the necessity for careful planning alongside experienced lab technicians to optimise implant placement and enhance the long-term success of craniofacial prosthesis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55318,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"63 8","pages":"Pages 589-595"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Craniofacial defect rehabilitation: long-term outcomes of implant-retained ear, nasal, and orbital prostheses – the Morriston experience\",\"authors\":\"Ioan Davies (Speciality Registrar in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery),&nbsp;Andrew Jenkinson (Consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon),&nbsp;Steven Key (Consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon),&nbsp;Peter Llewelyn Evans (Maxillofacial Laboratory Services Manager),&nbsp;Ketan Shah (Consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon),&nbsp;M.A. Kittur (Consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjoms.2025.06.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This retrospective study assessed the long-term outcomes of extraoral craniofacial implants used to support auricular, nasal, and orbital prosthesis in 138 patients treated at Morriston Hospital, Swansea, from 2004 to 2024. A total of 346 implants were reviewed, showing an overall implant survival rate of 91.9% and prosthesis survival rate of 89.6%. Long-term survival rates at 5, 10, and 20 years were highest for ear implants (100%, 90%, and 80%), respectively, followed by nasal (95.2%, 91.8%, and 91.8%) and orbital implants (89%, 86.6%, and 77%), respectively. Radiotherapy was associated with poorer implant survival, with a survival rate of 89.3% in irradiated implants compared with 97% in non-irradiated implants (p = 0.0219). Amongst the irradiated implants, those placed during ablative surgery showed a significantly improved survival rate (92.49%) than those placed following radiotherapy (68.42%, p = 0.0069). Emerging plating systems such as Epitek show promise in providing alternative nasal prosthesis retention but require further long-term follow up. The above findings underscore the necessity for careful planning alongside experienced lab technicians to optimise implant placement and enhance the long-term success of craniofacial prosthesis.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\"63 8\",\"pages\":\"Pages 589-595\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266435625001445\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266435625001445","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本回顾性研究评估了2004年至2024年在斯旺西Morriston医院治疗的138例患者使用口外颅面植入物支持耳、鼻和眶假体的长期疗效。共回顾了346个种植体,总体种植体存活率为91.9%,假体存活率为89.6%。耳种植体5年、10年和20年的长期生存率最高(分别为100%、90%和80%),其次是鼻种植体(95.2%、91.8%和91.8%)和眶种植体(89%、86.6%和77%)。放疗与较差的种植体存活率相关,放疗种植体的存活率为89.3%,而未放疗种植体的存活率为97% (p = 0.0219)。在放疗组中,消融手术中放置的种植体生存率(92.49%)明显高于放疗后放置的种植体(68.42%,p = 0.0069)。新兴的电镀系统如Epitek显示出提供替代鼻假体保留的希望,但需要进一步的长期随访。上述研究结果强调了精心规划的必要性,以及经验丰富的实验室技术人员,以优化种植体的放置,提高颅面假体的长期成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Craniofacial defect rehabilitation: long-term outcomes of implant-retained ear, nasal, and orbital prostheses – the Morriston experience
This retrospective study assessed the long-term outcomes of extraoral craniofacial implants used to support auricular, nasal, and orbital prosthesis in 138 patients treated at Morriston Hospital, Swansea, from 2004 to 2024. A total of 346 implants were reviewed, showing an overall implant survival rate of 91.9% and prosthesis survival rate of 89.6%. Long-term survival rates at 5, 10, and 20 years were highest for ear implants (100%, 90%, and 80%), respectively, followed by nasal (95.2%, 91.8%, and 91.8%) and orbital implants (89%, 86.6%, and 77%), respectively. Radiotherapy was associated with poorer implant survival, with a survival rate of 89.3% in irradiated implants compared with 97% in non-irradiated implants (p = 0.0219). Amongst the irradiated implants, those placed during ablative surgery showed a significantly improved survival rate (92.49%) than those placed following radiotherapy (68.42%, p = 0.0069). Emerging plating systems such as Epitek show promise in providing alternative nasal prosthesis retention but require further long-term follow up. The above findings underscore the necessity for careful planning alongside experienced lab technicians to optimise implant placement and enhance the long-term success of craniofacial prosthesis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
256
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of the British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons: • Leading articles on all aspects of surgery in the oro-facial and head and neck region • One of the largest circulations of any international journal in this field • Dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信