化疗对非裔美国乳腺癌患者财务毒性的影响:导航辅助低分割I期临床试验的早期发现

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Maya J Stephens, Nimisha Kasliwal, Ursula J Burnette, Louisa Onyewadume, Tamika K Smith, Corey W Speers, Cynthia Owusu, Shearwood McClelland
{"title":"化疗对非裔美国乳腺癌患者财务毒性的影响:导航辅助低分割I期临床试验的早期发现","authors":"Maya J Stephens, Nimisha Kasliwal, Ursula J Burnette, Louisa Onyewadume, Tamika K Smith, Corey W Speers, Cynthia Owusu, Shearwood McClelland","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>With the rising cost of chemotherapy, the financial toxicity (FT) of systemic therapy can substantially impair patient quality of life. FT is also associated with various socioeconomic factors, one being race. Patients of African American race often bear the worst burden of cancer treatment-related FT, with a 40% increased mortality from breast cancer. The degree to which chemotherapy before radiation therapy (RT) impacts FT has yet to be formally quantified. We report early FT findings among African American breast cancer patients before receipt of adjuvant RT on the ongoing Navigator-Assisted Hypofractionation (NAVAH) phase I clinical trial to assess the impact of chemotherapy on FT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>African American breast cancer patients undergoing RT were eligible if age 18+ with pathologically confirmed breast cancer following resection. FT was measured using the validated 12-item COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity-Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (COST-FACIT) survey instrument. Values from 26 to 44 represent grade 0 FT (none), 14 to 25 grade 1 FT (mild), 1 to 13 grade 2 FT (moderate), and 0 represents grade 3 FT (severe). The χ 2 test assessed statistically significant differences ( P < 0.05) between patients who received chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy before RT receipt.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean COST-FACIT score was 25 (±10.4); 61% experienced mild to severe FT. Of the 38 patients, 53% underwent chemotherapy before RT. Patients with prior chemotherapy treatment reported 16% grade 0 FT, 53% grade 1 FT, 26% grade 2 FT, and 5% grade 3 FT. The relationship between adjuvant chemotherapy and FT was statistically significant ( P = 0.0028).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Over 60% of participants in this study experienced some degree of meaningful FT. These results from an ongoing phase I clinical trial indicate a subsection of patients may benefit from proactive financial assistance to reduce the detrimental effect of FT on their breast cancer treatment, highlighting patients requiring chemotherapy before RT being more likely to experience FT.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"526-528"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Chemotherapy on Financial Toxicity in African American Breast Cancer Patients: Early Findings From the Navigator-Assisted Hypofractionation Phase I Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Maya J Stephens, Nimisha Kasliwal, Ursula J Burnette, Louisa Onyewadume, Tamika K Smith, Corey W Speers, Cynthia Owusu, Shearwood McClelland\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/COC.0000000000001241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>With the rising cost of chemotherapy, the financial toxicity (FT) of systemic therapy can substantially impair patient quality of life. FT is also associated with various socioeconomic factors, one being race. Patients of African American race often bear the worst burden of cancer treatment-related FT, with a 40% increased mortality from breast cancer. The degree to which chemotherapy before radiation therapy (RT) impacts FT has yet to be formally quantified. We report early FT findings among African American breast cancer patients before receipt of adjuvant RT on the ongoing Navigator-Assisted Hypofractionation (NAVAH) phase I clinical trial to assess the impact of chemotherapy on FT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>African American breast cancer patients undergoing RT were eligible if age 18+ with pathologically confirmed breast cancer following resection. FT was measured using the validated 12-item COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity-Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (COST-FACIT) survey instrument. Values from 26 to 44 represent grade 0 FT (none), 14 to 25 grade 1 FT (mild), 1 to 13 grade 2 FT (moderate), and 0 represents grade 3 FT (severe). The χ 2 test assessed statistically significant differences ( P < 0.05) between patients who received chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy before RT receipt.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean COST-FACIT score was 25 (±10.4); 61% experienced mild to severe FT. Of the 38 patients, 53% underwent chemotherapy before RT. Patients with prior chemotherapy treatment reported 16% grade 0 FT, 53% grade 1 FT, 26% grade 2 FT, and 5% grade 3 FT. The relationship between adjuvant chemotherapy and FT was statistically significant ( P = 0.0028).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Over 60% of participants in this study experienced some degree of meaningful FT. These results from an ongoing phase I clinical trial indicate a subsection of patients may benefit from proactive financial assistance to reduce the detrimental effect of FT on their breast cancer treatment, highlighting patients requiring chemotherapy before RT being more likely to experience FT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"526-528\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001241\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001241","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:随着化疗费用的上升,全身治疗的财务毒性(FT)会严重损害患者的生活质量。FT还与各种社会经济因素有关,其中之一就是种族。非裔美国人往往承受着与癌症治疗相关的FT最沉重的负担,乳腺癌死亡率增加了40%。放疗前化疗(RT)对FT的影响程度尚未正式量化。我们报告了在正在进行的导航辅助低分割(NAVAH) I期临床试验中接受辅助放疗前非洲裔美国乳腺癌患者的早期FT发现,以评估化疗对FT的影响。方法:接受RT的非洲裔美国乳腺癌患者如果年龄在18岁以上,切除后病理证实为乳腺癌,则符合条件。FT采用经验证的12项综合评分慢性疾病治疗财务毒性-功能评估(COST-FACIT)调查工具进行测量。26 ~ 44表示0级FT(无),14 ~ 25表示1级FT(轻度),1 ~ 13表示2级FT(中度),0表示3级FT(严重)。经χ2检验,放疗前接受化疗与未接受化疗的患者差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结果:平均COST-FACIT评分为25分(±10.4分);在38例患者中,53%的患者在放疗前接受了化疗。既往接受化疗的患者中,0级FT占16%,1级FT占53%,2级FT占26%,3级FT占5%。辅助化疗与FT的关系有统计学意义(P = 0.0028)。结论:在这项研究中,超过60%的参与者经历了某种程度的有意义的FT。这些来自正在进行的I期临床试验的结果表明,一部分患者可能受益于积极的经济援助,以减少FT对其乳腺癌治疗的有害影响,强调在RT之前需要化疗的患者更有可能经历FT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Chemotherapy on Financial Toxicity in African American Breast Cancer Patients: Early Findings From the Navigator-Assisted Hypofractionation Phase I Clinical Trial.

Objectives: With the rising cost of chemotherapy, the financial toxicity (FT) of systemic therapy can substantially impair patient quality of life. FT is also associated with various socioeconomic factors, one being race. Patients of African American race often bear the worst burden of cancer treatment-related FT, with a 40% increased mortality from breast cancer. The degree to which chemotherapy before radiation therapy (RT) impacts FT has yet to be formally quantified. We report early FT findings among African American breast cancer patients before receipt of adjuvant RT on the ongoing Navigator-Assisted Hypofractionation (NAVAH) phase I clinical trial to assess the impact of chemotherapy on FT.

Methods: African American breast cancer patients undergoing RT were eligible if age 18+ with pathologically confirmed breast cancer following resection. FT was measured using the validated 12-item COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity-Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (COST-FACIT) survey instrument. Values from 26 to 44 represent grade 0 FT (none), 14 to 25 grade 1 FT (mild), 1 to 13 grade 2 FT (moderate), and 0 represents grade 3 FT (severe). The χ 2 test assessed statistically significant differences ( P < 0.05) between patients who received chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy before RT receipt.

Results: Mean COST-FACIT score was 25 (±10.4); 61% experienced mild to severe FT. Of the 38 patients, 53% underwent chemotherapy before RT. Patients with prior chemotherapy treatment reported 16% grade 0 FT, 53% grade 1 FT, 26% grade 2 FT, and 5% grade 3 FT. The relationship between adjuvant chemotherapy and FT was statistically significant ( P = 0.0028).

Conclusions: Over 60% of participants in this study experienced some degree of meaningful FT. These results from an ongoing phase I clinical trial indicate a subsection of patients may benefit from proactive financial assistance to reduce the detrimental effect of FT on their breast cancer treatment, highlighting patients requiring chemotherapy before RT being more likely to experience FT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
130
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​American Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for cancer surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, and pediatric oncologists. The emphasis of AJCO is on combined modality multidisciplinary loco-regional management of cancer. The journal also gives emphasis to translational research, outcome studies, and cost utility analyses, and includes opinion pieces and review articles. The editorial board includes a large number of distinguished surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, pediatric oncologists, and others who are internationally recognized for expertise in their fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信