Mikhail Y Akbashev, Alyssa Utz, Phillip Anjum, Stacey Watkins, Michael Mattaliano, Palak Patel, Debbie Vigliotti, Mara L Schenker, Bhavin B Adhyaru
{"title":"关于CDS失败的专题:基于电子健康记录的警报的演变,以优化静脉血栓栓塞预防。","authors":"Mikhail Y Akbashev, Alyssa Utz, Phillip Anjum, Stacey Watkins, Michael Mattaliano, Palak Patel, Debbie Vigliotti, Mara L Schenker, Bhavin B Adhyaru","doi":"10.1055/a-2672-8358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in hospitalized patients must balance risks of bleeding and thrombosis. Clinical changes such as bleeding or renal injury can also trigger changes or delays in thromboprophylaxis. Electronic health record alerts (EHRAs) can allow for targeted notification to providers to improve venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and improve patient outcomes at the risk of alert fatigue if not carefully designed and implemented.This study aimed to develop and refine an EHRA that minimizes nuisance alerts while facilitating appropriate ordering of VTE prophylaxis for medical patients.A multidisciplinary group at a single large safety-net academic medical center developed an EHRA to identify patients at increased thrombosis risk, but without orders for VTE prophylaxis. This was refined over four phases: development and validation, initial monitoring and exclusion criteria adjustment, COVID-19-related modifications, and delayed surveillance and modification. Data analysis evaluated criteria including alert frequency, alert action/utilization, and alert duration.The EHRA fired an average of 33.3 times per day across all phases of the study. Phase 1 of EHRA implementation showed significantly increased alerts per patient (6.4 to 43.3 alerts per day, <i>p</i> < 0.01) as well as the percentage of patients with >5 alerts (2.8 to 60.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Modifications in phase 2 and phase 3 increased alert rates without any significant effect on subsequent action taken by a provider. Phase 4 modifications led to a significant reduction in alert frequency (44.1 to 14.9 alerts per day, <i>p</i> < 0.01) coupled with a notable increase in provider action (0.24 to 7.73%, <i>p</i> < 0.01).This multidisciplinary, provider-centered, intervention improved alert appearance, and information needed to guide providers increased provider engagement 32-fold, with a 3-fold decrease in alert frequency. Despite improvements, ongoing monitoring and maintenance of this alert is important.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":"1060-1066"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12425610/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evolution of an Electronic Health Record-Based Alert to Optimize Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis.\",\"authors\":\"Mikhail Y Akbashev, Alyssa Utz, Phillip Anjum, Stacey Watkins, Michael Mattaliano, Palak Patel, Debbie Vigliotti, Mara L Schenker, Bhavin B Adhyaru\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2672-8358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in hospitalized patients must balance risks of bleeding and thrombosis. Clinical changes such as bleeding or renal injury can also trigger changes or delays in thromboprophylaxis. Electronic health record alerts (EHRAs) can allow for targeted notification to providers to improve venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and improve patient outcomes at the risk of alert fatigue if not carefully designed and implemented.This study aimed to develop and refine an EHRA that minimizes nuisance alerts while facilitating appropriate ordering of VTE prophylaxis for medical patients.A multidisciplinary group at a single large safety-net academic medical center developed an EHRA to identify patients at increased thrombosis risk, but without orders for VTE prophylaxis. This was refined over four phases: development and validation, initial monitoring and exclusion criteria adjustment, COVID-19-related modifications, and delayed surveillance and modification. Data analysis evaluated criteria including alert frequency, alert action/utilization, and alert duration.The EHRA fired an average of 33.3 times per day across all phases of the study. Phase 1 of EHRA implementation showed significantly increased alerts per patient (6.4 to 43.3 alerts per day, <i>p</i> < 0.01) as well as the percentage of patients with >5 alerts (2.8 to 60.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Modifications in phase 2 and phase 3 increased alert rates without any significant effect on subsequent action taken by a provider. Phase 4 modifications led to a significant reduction in alert frequency (44.1 to 14.9 alerts per day, <i>p</i> < 0.01) coupled with a notable increase in provider action (0.24 to 7.73%, <i>p</i> < 0.01).This multidisciplinary, provider-centered, intervention improved alert appearance, and information needed to guide providers increased provider engagement 32-fold, with a 3-fold decrease in alert frequency. Despite improvements, ongoing monitoring and maintenance of this alert is important.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1060-1066\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12425610/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2672-8358\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2672-8358","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evolution of an Electronic Health Record-Based Alert to Optimize Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in hospitalized patients must balance risks of bleeding and thrombosis. Clinical changes such as bleeding or renal injury can also trigger changes or delays in thromboprophylaxis. Electronic health record alerts (EHRAs) can allow for targeted notification to providers to improve venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and improve patient outcomes at the risk of alert fatigue if not carefully designed and implemented.This study aimed to develop and refine an EHRA that minimizes nuisance alerts while facilitating appropriate ordering of VTE prophylaxis for medical patients.A multidisciplinary group at a single large safety-net academic medical center developed an EHRA to identify patients at increased thrombosis risk, but without orders for VTE prophylaxis. This was refined over four phases: development and validation, initial monitoring and exclusion criteria adjustment, COVID-19-related modifications, and delayed surveillance and modification. Data analysis evaluated criteria including alert frequency, alert action/utilization, and alert duration.The EHRA fired an average of 33.3 times per day across all phases of the study. Phase 1 of EHRA implementation showed significantly increased alerts per patient (6.4 to 43.3 alerts per day, p < 0.01) as well as the percentage of patients with >5 alerts (2.8 to 60.0%, p < 0.01). Modifications in phase 2 and phase 3 increased alert rates without any significant effect on subsequent action taken by a provider. Phase 4 modifications led to a significant reduction in alert frequency (44.1 to 14.9 alerts per day, p < 0.01) coupled with a notable increase in provider action (0.24 to 7.73%, p < 0.01).This multidisciplinary, provider-centered, intervention improved alert appearance, and information needed to guide providers increased provider engagement 32-fold, with a 3-fold decrease in alert frequency. Despite improvements, ongoing monitoring and maintenance of this alert is important.
期刊介绍:
ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.