提高痴呆长期可穿戴研究的入组率和依从性:定性系统评价和元综合。

IF 4.8 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
JMIR Aging Pub Date : 2025-07-31 DOI:10.2196/63768
Colleen M Peterson, Renée M St Louis, Carol Flannagan
{"title":"提高痴呆长期可穿戴研究的入组率和依从性:定性系统评价和元综合。","authors":"Colleen M Peterson, Renée M St Louis, Carol Flannagan","doi":"10.2196/63768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the rapid expansion of wearable technologies, there is increased interest in their utility for passive data collection applications in research on aging. Wearables can be beneficial for research with people with dementia and their families, who have burdens that can make both study participation and reliable data collection more difficult, especially as dementia progresses, but their use also has challenges. Population-specific issues affecting the success of wearables for data collection can include remembering to wear a device, fluctuating acceptance of the device or study participation, and reliance on already strained caregivers.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to systematically evaluate contemporary wearables research to describe persons with dementia's experiences with wearables, their desired qualities, and protocol needs to enhance participant buy-in and sustained wearing for better quality dementia research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 checklist for systematic reviews and searched 3 scholarly databases using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms for papers published since 2018 featuring the use or discussion of wearable devices for persons with dementia. We screened 1757 abstracts and retained 58 for full-text review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We present synthesized preferences, barriers, and facilitators to buy-in and adherence to wearables in dementia research. A total of 29 factors were categorized into 4 overarching categories aligned with study development: device selection, protocol considerations, enhancing recruitment, and promoting adherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings inform researcher guidelines for wearable device selection and protocol design to enhance the utility of wearables in future longitudinal research featuring persons with dementia and their caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":36245,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Aging","volume":"8 ","pages":"e63768"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12355143/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Enrollment and Adherence in Long-Term Wearable Research on Dementia: Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis.\",\"authors\":\"Colleen M Peterson, Renée M St Louis, Carol Flannagan\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/63768\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the rapid expansion of wearable technologies, there is increased interest in their utility for passive data collection applications in research on aging. Wearables can be beneficial for research with people with dementia and their families, who have burdens that can make both study participation and reliable data collection more difficult, especially as dementia progresses, but their use also has challenges. Population-specific issues affecting the success of wearables for data collection can include remembering to wear a device, fluctuating acceptance of the device or study participation, and reliance on already strained caregivers.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to systematically evaluate contemporary wearables research to describe persons with dementia's experiences with wearables, their desired qualities, and protocol needs to enhance participant buy-in and sustained wearing for better quality dementia research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 checklist for systematic reviews and searched 3 scholarly databases using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms for papers published since 2018 featuring the use or discussion of wearable devices for persons with dementia. We screened 1757 abstracts and retained 58 for full-text review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We present synthesized preferences, barriers, and facilitators to buy-in and adherence to wearables in dementia research. A total of 29 factors were categorized into 4 overarching categories aligned with study development: device selection, protocol considerations, enhancing recruitment, and promoting adherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings inform researcher guidelines for wearable device selection and protocol design to enhance the utility of wearables in future longitudinal research featuring persons with dementia and their caregivers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Aging\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"e63768\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12355143/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/63768\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/63768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着可穿戴技术的迅速发展,人们对其在老龄化研究中的被动数据采集应用越来越感兴趣。可穿戴设备对痴呆症患者及其家人的研究是有益的,因为他们有负担,这可能会使研究参与和可靠的数据收集变得更加困难,尤其是在痴呆症进展的过程中,但它们的使用也存在挑战。影响可穿戴设备数据收集成功的特定人群问题可能包括记住佩戴设备,对设备或研究参与的接受程度波动,以及对已经紧张的护理人员的依赖。目的:本研究旨在系统评估当代可穿戴设备研究,以描述痴呆症患者对可穿戴设备的体验、他们期望的质量和方案需求,以增强参与者的购买和持续佩戴,以获得更高质量的痴呆症研究。方法:我们使用PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目)2020清单进行系统评价,并使用医学主题标题(MeSH)术语检索3个学术数据库,检索自2018年以来发表的关于痴呆症患者使用或讨论可穿戴设备的论文。我们筛选了1757篇摘要,并保留了58篇作为全文综述。结果:我们提出了在痴呆症研究中购买和坚持使用可穿戴设备的综合偏好、障碍和促进因素。共有29个因素与研究进展相一致,分为4个总体类别:设备选择、方案考虑、加强招募和促进依从性。结论:这些发现为研究人员提供了可穿戴设备选择和方案设计的指导方针,以增强可穿戴设备在未来痴呆患者及其护理人员的纵向研究中的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing Enrollment and Adherence in Long-Term Wearable Research on Dementia: Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis.

Background: With the rapid expansion of wearable technologies, there is increased interest in their utility for passive data collection applications in research on aging. Wearables can be beneficial for research with people with dementia and their families, who have burdens that can make both study participation and reliable data collection more difficult, especially as dementia progresses, but their use also has challenges. Population-specific issues affecting the success of wearables for data collection can include remembering to wear a device, fluctuating acceptance of the device or study participation, and reliance on already strained caregivers.

Objective: This study aimed to systematically evaluate contemporary wearables research to describe persons with dementia's experiences with wearables, their desired qualities, and protocol needs to enhance participant buy-in and sustained wearing for better quality dementia research.

Methods: We used the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 checklist for systematic reviews and searched 3 scholarly databases using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms for papers published since 2018 featuring the use or discussion of wearable devices for persons with dementia. We screened 1757 abstracts and retained 58 for full-text review.

Results: We present synthesized preferences, barriers, and facilitators to buy-in and adherence to wearables in dementia research. A total of 29 factors were categorized into 4 overarching categories aligned with study development: device selection, protocol considerations, enhancing recruitment, and promoting adherence.

Conclusions: These findings inform researcher guidelines for wearable device selection and protocol design to enhance the utility of wearables in future longitudinal research featuring persons with dementia and their caregivers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Aging
JMIR Aging Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信