功能性低视力和患者障碍接受多学科低视力康复服务:一个案例研究。

IF 0.9 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.4103/npmj.npmj_89_25
Thelma Imaobong Ndife, Abdulrazak Jimoh Momoh, Ugochukwu Anthony Eze, Justina Ogechi Nwaogwugwu
{"title":"功能性低视力和患者障碍接受多学科低视力康复服务:一个案例研究。","authors":"Thelma Imaobong Ndife, Abdulrazak Jimoh Momoh, Ugochukwu Anthony Eze, Justina Ogechi Nwaogwugwu","doi":"10.4103/npmj.npmj_89_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To estimate the prevalence, describe causes and prescription needs of functional low vision (FLV) patients, and highlight the barriers these patients encounter to the uptake of multidisciplinary low vision rehabilitation (LVR) service.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A mixed study design was adopted. Quantitative analysis consisted of a retrospective and cross-sectional review of 241 (FLV) patients managed at the National Eye Centre, Kaduna. Relevant data extracted from patient records were age, sex, occupation, best-corrected visual acuity, cause of low vision and low vision aids or rehabilitation prescribed. Qualitatively, 45 FLV patients were selected by systematic random sampling. Patient barriers to the uptake of LVR services were elicited through one-on-one interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of FLV was 1.02% (95% confidence interval: 0.98-1.06). The mean age was 44.45 ± 20 years. One hundred and forty two (59%) were above 40 years old and 60.5% were unemployed. Major causes of FLV were glaucoma (31%), age-related macular degeneration (24%) and retinitis pigmentosa (12%). Prescription needs were magnifiers (29%), non-optical (23%) low vision aids, telescopes (17%), multiple aids (15%) and visual rehabilitation (28%). The uptake of LVRs was 67%. The most common barriers to LVR uptake were the cost of the device (97%), lack of family support (90%) and hesitancy using the device (84%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FLV was caused by progressively worsening diseases like glaucoma. The major patient barrier to assessing a multidisciplinary LVR service was financial constraint.</p>","PeriodicalId":19720,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal","volume":"32 3","pages":"233-239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional Low Vision and Patient Barriers to the Uptake of a Multidisciplinary Low Vision Rehabilitation Service: A Case Study.\",\"authors\":\"Thelma Imaobong Ndife, Abdulrazak Jimoh Momoh, Ugochukwu Anthony Eze, Justina Ogechi Nwaogwugwu\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/npmj.npmj_89_25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To estimate the prevalence, describe causes and prescription needs of functional low vision (FLV) patients, and highlight the barriers these patients encounter to the uptake of multidisciplinary low vision rehabilitation (LVR) service.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A mixed study design was adopted. Quantitative analysis consisted of a retrospective and cross-sectional review of 241 (FLV) patients managed at the National Eye Centre, Kaduna. Relevant data extracted from patient records were age, sex, occupation, best-corrected visual acuity, cause of low vision and low vision aids or rehabilitation prescribed. Qualitatively, 45 FLV patients were selected by systematic random sampling. Patient barriers to the uptake of LVR services were elicited through one-on-one interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of FLV was 1.02% (95% confidence interval: 0.98-1.06). The mean age was 44.45 ± 20 years. One hundred and forty two (59%) were above 40 years old and 60.5% were unemployed. Major causes of FLV were glaucoma (31%), age-related macular degeneration (24%) and retinitis pigmentosa (12%). Prescription needs were magnifiers (29%), non-optical (23%) low vision aids, telescopes (17%), multiple aids (15%) and visual rehabilitation (28%). The uptake of LVRs was 67%. The most common barriers to LVR uptake were the cost of the device (97%), lack of family support (90%) and hesitancy using the device (84%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FLV was caused by progressively worsening diseases like glaucoma. The major patient barrier to assessing a multidisciplinary LVR service was financial constraint.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"233-239\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/npmj.npmj_89_25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/npmj.npmj_89_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估功能性低视力(FLV)患者的患病率,描述原因和处方需求,并强调这些患者在接受多学科低视力康复(LVR)服务时遇到的障碍。材料与方法:采用混合研究设计。定量分析包括对卡杜纳国家眼科中心管理的241例FLV患者进行回顾性和横断面评价。从患者病历中提取的相关数据包括年龄、性别、职业、最佳矫正视力、低视力原因、低视力辅助设备或康复处方。定性:采用系统随机抽样的方法选取45例FLV患者。患者接受LVR服务的障碍是通过一对一的访谈得出的。结果:FLV患病率为1.02%(95%可信区间:0.98 ~ 1.06)。平均年龄44.45±20岁。其中有142人(59%)年龄在40岁以上,60.5%的人没有工作。FLV的主要病因是青光眼(31%)、年龄相关性黄斑变性(24%)和视网膜色素变性(12%)。处方需求为放大镜(29%)、非光学(23%)低视力辅助设备、望远镜(17%)、多种辅助设备(15%)和视力康复(28%)。lvr的摄取率为67%。采用LVR最常见的障碍是设备的成本(97%),缺乏家庭支持(90%)和犹豫使用设备(84%)。结论:FLV是由青光眼等进行性恶化疾病引起的。患者评估多学科LVR服务的主要障碍是资金限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Functional Low Vision and Patient Barriers to the Uptake of a Multidisciplinary Low Vision Rehabilitation Service: A Case Study.

Aims: To estimate the prevalence, describe causes and prescription needs of functional low vision (FLV) patients, and highlight the barriers these patients encounter to the uptake of multidisciplinary low vision rehabilitation (LVR) service.

Materials and methods: A mixed study design was adopted. Quantitative analysis consisted of a retrospective and cross-sectional review of 241 (FLV) patients managed at the National Eye Centre, Kaduna. Relevant data extracted from patient records were age, sex, occupation, best-corrected visual acuity, cause of low vision and low vision aids or rehabilitation prescribed. Qualitatively, 45 FLV patients were selected by systematic random sampling. Patient barriers to the uptake of LVR services were elicited through one-on-one interviews.

Results: The prevalence of FLV was 1.02% (95% confidence interval: 0.98-1.06). The mean age was 44.45 ± 20 years. One hundred and forty two (59%) were above 40 years old and 60.5% were unemployed. Major causes of FLV were glaucoma (31%), age-related macular degeneration (24%) and retinitis pigmentosa (12%). Prescription needs were magnifiers (29%), non-optical (23%) low vision aids, telescopes (17%), multiple aids (15%) and visual rehabilitation (28%). The uptake of LVRs was 67%. The most common barriers to LVR uptake were the cost of the device (97%), lack of family support (90%) and hesitancy using the device (84%).

Conclusion: FLV was caused by progressively worsening diseases like glaucoma. The major patient barrier to assessing a multidisciplinary LVR service was financial constraint.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal
Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信