低分割立体定向放疗与脑转移灶切除术后全脑放疗——ESTRON随机2期试验的结果。

IF 13.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Rami A El Shafie, Denise Bernhardt, Thomas Welzel, Annabella Schiele, Daniela Schmitt, Paul Thalmann, Sinem Erdem, Tanja Eichkorn, Angela Paul, Kristin Lang, Laila König, Fabian Weykamp, Sebastian Adeberg, Adriane Lentz-Hommertgen, Cornelia Jäkel, Farastuk Bozorgmehr, Michael Thomas, Anja Sander, Meinhard Kieser, Jürgen Debus, Stefan Rieken
{"title":"低分割立体定向放疗与脑转移灶切除术后全脑放疗——ESTRON随机2期试验的结果。","authors":"Rami A El Shafie, Denise Bernhardt, Thomas Welzel, Annabella Schiele, Daniela Schmitt, Paul Thalmann, Sinem Erdem, Tanja Eichkorn, Angela Paul, Kristin Lang, Laila König, Fabian Weykamp, Sebastian Adeberg, Adriane Lentz-Hommertgen, Cornelia Jäkel, Farastuk Bozorgmehr, Michael Thomas, Anja Sander, Meinhard Kieser, Jürgen Debus, Stefan Rieken","doi":"10.1093/neuonc/noaf182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative radiotherapy improves local control after brain metastasis (BM) resection. Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) reduces recurrence risk but impairs neurocognition. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of the cavity (HFSRT) may offer equivalent tumor control with reduced toxicity. ESTRON is the first randomized trial comparing post-operative HFSRT and WBRT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center phase 2 trial randomized 56 patients with resected BM to receive HFSRT (35 Gy in 7 fractions) or WBRT (30 Gy in 10 fractions). Patients could have ≤10 additional unresected BMs. The primary endpoint was intracranial progression-free survival (ic-PFS). Secondary endpoints included local control (LC), overall survival (OS), leptomeningeal disease (LMD), and toxicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-four patients were evaluable (n=27 per arm). At 24.7 months median follow-up, 12-month ic-PFS was 44.4% (HFSRT) versus 59.3% (WBRT) (HR 1.72, p=0.080). Median ic-PFS was 4.7 vs. 15.0 months. LC at 24 months was 94.1% (HFSRT) vs. 85.4% (WBRT) (HR 0.41, p=0.433). One-year OS was 63.0% (HFSRT) vs. 77.8% (WBRT), with no significant difference in median OS (17.8 vs. 27.0 months; HR 1.09, p=0.336). One-year risk of LMD was 27.0% (HFSRT, predominantly outside the irradiated field) vs. 8.7% (WBRT) (log-rank p=0.03). Treatment-related adverse events were more frequent with WBRT (115 vs. 54 events), including 19% vs. 11% grade 3 events, and poorer neurocognitive performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Survival was similar for HFSRT and WBRT, while WBRT trended towards better ic-PFS. HFSRT showed substantially lower toxicity and better neurocognitive preservation, however a higher risk of LMD. Risks and benefits should be weighed individually when determining post-operative treatment for BM.</p>","PeriodicalId":19377,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy versus Whole-Brain Radiotherapy following Brain Metastasis Resection - Results of the ESTRON Randomized Phase 2 Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Rami A El Shafie, Denise Bernhardt, Thomas Welzel, Annabella Schiele, Daniela Schmitt, Paul Thalmann, Sinem Erdem, Tanja Eichkorn, Angela Paul, Kristin Lang, Laila König, Fabian Weykamp, Sebastian Adeberg, Adriane Lentz-Hommertgen, Cornelia Jäkel, Farastuk Bozorgmehr, Michael Thomas, Anja Sander, Meinhard Kieser, Jürgen Debus, Stefan Rieken\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/neuonc/noaf182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative radiotherapy improves local control after brain metastasis (BM) resection. Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) reduces recurrence risk but impairs neurocognition. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of the cavity (HFSRT) may offer equivalent tumor control with reduced toxicity. ESTRON is the first randomized trial comparing post-operative HFSRT and WBRT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center phase 2 trial randomized 56 patients with resected BM to receive HFSRT (35 Gy in 7 fractions) or WBRT (30 Gy in 10 fractions). Patients could have ≤10 additional unresected BMs. The primary endpoint was intracranial progression-free survival (ic-PFS). Secondary endpoints included local control (LC), overall survival (OS), leptomeningeal disease (LMD), and toxicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-four patients were evaluable (n=27 per arm). At 24.7 months median follow-up, 12-month ic-PFS was 44.4% (HFSRT) versus 59.3% (WBRT) (HR 1.72, p=0.080). Median ic-PFS was 4.7 vs. 15.0 months. LC at 24 months was 94.1% (HFSRT) vs. 85.4% (WBRT) (HR 0.41, p=0.433). One-year OS was 63.0% (HFSRT) vs. 77.8% (WBRT), with no significant difference in median OS (17.8 vs. 27.0 months; HR 1.09, p=0.336). One-year risk of LMD was 27.0% (HFSRT, predominantly outside the irradiated field) vs. 8.7% (WBRT) (log-rank p=0.03). Treatment-related adverse events were more frequent with WBRT (115 vs. 54 events), including 19% vs. 11% grade 3 events, and poorer neurocognitive performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Survival was similar for HFSRT and WBRT, while WBRT trended towards better ic-PFS. HFSRT showed substantially lower toxicity and better neurocognitive preservation, however a higher risk of LMD. Risks and benefits should be weighed individually when determining post-operative treatment for BM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuro-oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuro-oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf182\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf182","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:术后放疗改善脑转移(BM)切除术后的局部控制。全脑放疗(WBRT)降低复发风险,但损害神经认知。低分割立体定向放射治疗的腔(HFSRT)可以提供等效的肿瘤控制与降低毒性。ESTRON是第一个比较术后HFSRT和WBRT的随机试验。方法:这项单中心2期试验随机选择56例切除的BM患者接受HFSRT(7次35 Gy)或WBRT(10次30 Gy)。患者可能有≤10个未切除的脑转移瘤。主要终点是颅内无进展生存期(ic-PFS)。次要终点包括局部对照(LC)、总生存期(OS)、脑脊膜疾病(LMD)和毒性。结果:54例患者可评估(每组27例)。在24.7个月的中位随访中,12个月的ic-PFS为44.4% (HFSRT)对59.3% (WBRT) (HR 1.72, p=0.080)。中位ic-PFS分别为4.7和15.0个月。24个月时LC为94.1% (HFSRT) vs. 85.4% (WBRT) (HR 0.41, p=0.433)。1年OS为63.0% (HFSRT) vs 77.8% (WBRT),中位OS无显著差异(17.8个月vs 27.0个月;HR 1.09, p=0.336)。1年LMD风险为27.0% (HFSRT,主要在辐照场外)vs. 8.7% (WBRT) (log-rank p=0.03)。WBRT治疗相关不良事件更频繁(115对54),包括3级事件19%对11%,以及更差的神经认知表现。结论:HFSRT和WBRT的生存率相似,而WBRT倾向于更好的ic-PFS。HFSRT的毒性较低,神经认知功能保存较好,但LMD的风险较高。在确定脑脊髓炎术后治疗时,风险和收益应单独权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy versus Whole-Brain Radiotherapy following Brain Metastasis Resection - Results of the ESTRON Randomized Phase 2 Trial.

Background: Postoperative radiotherapy improves local control after brain metastasis (BM) resection. Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) reduces recurrence risk but impairs neurocognition. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of the cavity (HFSRT) may offer equivalent tumor control with reduced toxicity. ESTRON is the first randomized trial comparing post-operative HFSRT and WBRT.

Methods: This single-center phase 2 trial randomized 56 patients with resected BM to receive HFSRT (35 Gy in 7 fractions) or WBRT (30 Gy in 10 fractions). Patients could have ≤10 additional unresected BMs. The primary endpoint was intracranial progression-free survival (ic-PFS). Secondary endpoints included local control (LC), overall survival (OS), leptomeningeal disease (LMD), and toxicity.

Results: Fifty-four patients were evaluable (n=27 per arm). At 24.7 months median follow-up, 12-month ic-PFS was 44.4% (HFSRT) versus 59.3% (WBRT) (HR 1.72, p=0.080). Median ic-PFS was 4.7 vs. 15.0 months. LC at 24 months was 94.1% (HFSRT) vs. 85.4% (WBRT) (HR 0.41, p=0.433). One-year OS was 63.0% (HFSRT) vs. 77.8% (WBRT), with no significant difference in median OS (17.8 vs. 27.0 months; HR 1.09, p=0.336). One-year risk of LMD was 27.0% (HFSRT, predominantly outside the irradiated field) vs. 8.7% (WBRT) (log-rank p=0.03). Treatment-related adverse events were more frequent with WBRT (115 vs. 54 events), including 19% vs. 11% grade 3 events, and poorer neurocognitive performance.

Conclusions: Survival was similar for HFSRT and WBRT, while WBRT trended towards better ic-PFS. HFSRT showed substantially lower toxicity and better neurocognitive preservation, however a higher risk of LMD. Risks and benefits should be weighed individually when determining post-operative treatment for BM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuro-oncology
Neuro-oncology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
27.20
自引率
6.30%
发文量
1434
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuro-Oncology, the official journal of the Society for Neuro-Oncology, has been published monthly since January 2010. Affiliated with the Japan Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology, it is a global leader in the field. The journal is committed to swiftly disseminating high-quality information across all areas of neuro-oncology. It features peer-reviewed articles, reviews, symposia on various topics, abstracts from annual meetings, and updates from neuro-oncology societies worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信