Mitchell D'Aloia, Dale Smith, Randy Boley, Emily Schamber, Dillon Thorpe, Trevonne M Thompson, Neeraj Chhabra
{"title":"美国对乙酰氨基酚中毒使用福美唑的趋势2013 - 2024。","authors":"Mitchell D'Aloia, Dale Smith, Randy Boley, Emily Schamber, Dillon Thorpe, Trevonne M Thompson, Neeraj Chhabra","doi":"10.1007/s13181-025-01091-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fomepizole has been suggested as adjunctive therapy for severe acetaminophen poisoning though clinical efficacy is unknown. We sought to determine trends in the use of fomepizole for acetaminophen poisoning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cross-sectional analysis of hospitalized patients with acetaminophen poisoning from January 2013 through December 2024, using Epic Cosmos, a research database of 298 million patients nationally. We identified encounters involving acetaminophen poisoning by International Classification of Diseases, version 10 (ICD-10-CM) code. Data extracted included administration of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and fomepizole, demographic data, and outcomes of death and liver transplantation. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics to identify trends and multivariable logistic regression to determine associations with death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 114,111 hospital encounters involving acetaminophen poisoning with 64,957 (56.92%) receiving NAC, and 1,552 (1.36%) receiving fomepizole. In 2013, 0.44% of NAC-treated acetaminophen poisoning cases also received fomepizole. This rose to 6.27% in 2024. From 2013 to 2019, the proportion of NAC-treated acetaminophen cases receiving fomepizole was stable, but from 2019 to 2024, there was a 1029.64% increase in fomepizole use. Regression modeling indicated increased odds for death (OR = 5.88, aOR = 5.32 [95% CI: 4.52, 6.27]) among those who received fomepizole in addition to NAC, indicating increased fomepizole use in patients with severe toxicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fomepizole use in acetaminophen poisoning has risen dramatically since 2019, particularly among patients at highest risk for death and liver transplantation. It is of critical importance to determine the efficacy of fomepizole for acetaminophen poisoning.</p>","PeriodicalId":16429,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"404-408"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in Fomepizole Use for Acetaminophen Poisoning in the United States; 2013-2024.\",\"authors\":\"Mitchell D'Aloia, Dale Smith, Randy Boley, Emily Schamber, Dillon Thorpe, Trevonne M Thompson, Neeraj Chhabra\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13181-025-01091-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fomepizole has been suggested as adjunctive therapy for severe acetaminophen poisoning though clinical efficacy is unknown. We sought to determine trends in the use of fomepizole for acetaminophen poisoning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cross-sectional analysis of hospitalized patients with acetaminophen poisoning from January 2013 through December 2024, using Epic Cosmos, a research database of 298 million patients nationally. We identified encounters involving acetaminophen poisoning by International Classification of Diseases, version 10 (ICD-10-CM) code. Data extracted included administration of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and fomepizole, demographic data, and outcomes of death and liver transplantation. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics to identify trends and multivariable logistic regression to determine associations with death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 114,111 hospital encounters involving acetaminophen poisoning with 64,957 (56.92%) receiving NAC, and 1,552 (1.36%) receiving fomepizole. In 2013, 0.44% of NAC-treated acetaminophen poisoning cases also received fomepizole. This rose to 6.27% in 2024. From 2013 to 2019, the proportion of NAC-treated acetaminophen cases receiving fomepizole was stable, but from 2019 to 2024, there was a 1029.64% increase in fomepizole use. Regression modeling indicated increased odds for death (OR = 5.88, aOR = 5.32 [95% CI: 4.52, 6.27]) among those who received fomepizole in addition to NAC, indicating increased fomepizole use in patients with severe toxicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fomepizole use in acetaminophen poisoning has risen dramatically since 2019, particularly among patients at highest risk for death and liver transplantation. It is of critical importance to determine the efficacy of fomepizole for acetaminophen poisoning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Toxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"404-408\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-025-01091-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-025-01091-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Trends in Fomepizole Use for Acetaminophen Poisoning in the United States; 2013-2024.
Background: Fomepizole has been suggested as adjunctive therapy for severe acetaminophen poisoning though clinical efficacy is unknown. We sought to determine trends in the use of fomepizole for acetaminophen poisoning.
Methods: This is a cross-sectional analysis of hospitalized patients with acetaminophen poisoning from January 2013 through December 2024, using Epic Cosmos, a research database of 298 million patients nationally. We identified encounters involving acetaminophen poisoning by International Classification of Diseases, version 10 (ICD-10-CM) code. Data extracted included administration of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and fomepizole, demographic data, and outcomes of death and liver transplantation. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics to identify trends and multivariable logistic regression to determine associations with death.
Results: There were 114,111 hospital encounters involving acetaminophen poisoning with 64,957 (56.92%) receiving NAC, and 1,552 (1.36%) receiving fomepizole. In 2013, 0.44% of NAC-treated acetaminophen poisoning cases also received fomepizole. This rose to 6.27% in 2024. From 2013 to 2019, the proportion of NAC-treated acetaminophen cases receiving fomepizole was stable, but from 2019 to 2024, there was a 1029.64% increase in fomepizole use. Regression modeling indicated increased odds for death (OR = 5.88, aOR = 5.32 [95% CI: 4.52, 6.27]) among those who received fomepizole in addition to NAC, indicating increased fomepizole use in patients with severe toxicity.
Conclusion: Fomepizole use in acetaminophen poisoning has risen dramatically since 2019, particularly among patients at highest risk for death and liver transplantation. It is of critical importance to determine the efficacy of fomepizole for acetaminophen poisoning.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Medical Toxicology (JMT) is a peer-reviewed medical journal dedicated to advances in clinical toxicology, focusing on the diagnosis, management, and prevention of poisoning and other adverse health effects resulting from medications, chemicals, occupational and environmental substances, and biological hazards. As the official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology (ACMT), JMT is managed by an editorial board of clinicians as well as scientists and thus publishes research that is relevant to medical toxicologists, emergency physicians, critical care specialists, pediatricians, pre-hospital providers, occupational physicians, substance abuse experts, veterinary toxicologists, and policy makers. JMT articles generate considerable interest in the lay media, with 2016 JMT articles cited by various social media sites, the Boston Globe, and the Washington Post among others. For questions or comments about the journal, please contact jmtinfo@acmt.net.
For questions or comments about the journal, please contact jmtinfo@acmt.net.