Jobin Varghese, Jashan Gill, Rezwan Munshi, Henri Roukoz, Jaimin R Trivedi, Adarsh Bhan, Ashwin Ravichandran, Jennifer Cowger, Chirag Sandesara, Rahul Dhawan, Rajakrishnan Vijayakrishnan, Mark S Slaughter, Mustafa M Ahmed, Rakesh Gopinathannair
{"title":"连续血流左心室辅助装置受者室性心律失常的发生率、预测因素和结果:一项多中心分析。","authors":"Jobin Varghese, Jashan Gill, Rezwan Munshi, Henri Roukoz, Jaimin R Trivedi, Adarsh Bhan, Ashwin Ravichandran, Jennifer Cowger, Chirag Sandesara, Rahul Dhawan, Rajakrishnan Vijayakrishnan, Mark S Slaughter, Mustafa M Ahmed, Rakesh Gopinathannair","doi":"10.1111/jce.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are common in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), but their prognostic impact remains uncertain. Prior studies have yielded conflicting results regarding their association with mortality and morbidity. We aimed to evaluate the incidence and clinical outcomes associated with VAs in a large, multicenter LVAD cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 408 patients who underwent LVAD implantation across five centers between 2007 and 2015. VA was defined as sustained VAs lasting > 30 s or requiring ICD therapy. The effects of pre- and post-LVAD VA on clinical outcomes-including survival, hospitalizations, and ICD shocks-were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 408 patients, 254 (62%) had a history of pre-LVAD VA. Compared to those without prior VA, patients with pre-LVAD VA were more likely to be male (85% vs. 75%, p = 0.02), receive amiodarone (44% vs. 31%, p = 0.01), and have larger left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) (7.1 vs. 6.8 cm, p = 0.01). Postimplant, the pre-VA group had a significantly higher incidence of VA (73% vs. 37%, p < 0.0001), atrial arrhythmias (63% vs. 42%, p < 0.0001), ICD shocks (41% vs. 32%, p = 0.001), and cardiac hospitalizations (median 0.20 vs. 0.08 events/year, p = 0.0003). However, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no significant difference in overall mortality (log-rank p = 0.10). On multivariate Cox regression, pre-LVAD VA predicted post-LVAD VA, but LVEDD was the only independent predictor of mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this multicenter cohort, pre-LVAD VAs were strongly associated with postimplant arrhythmic burden and increased morbidity, but not with long-term mortality. These findings highlight the importance of structural factors such as LVEDD over arrhythmia history in survival outcomes and underscore the need for individualized arrhythmia surveillance and management strategies in LVAD recipients with prior VAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes With Ventricular Arrhythmias in Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients: A Multicenter Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jobin Varghese, Jashan Gill, Rezwan Munshi, Henri Roukoz, Jaimin R Trivedi, Adarsh Bhan, Ashwin Ravichandran, Jennifer Cowger, Chirag Sandesara, Rahul Dhawan, Rajakrishnan Vijayakrishnan, Mark S Slaughter, Mustafa M Ahmed, Rakesh Gopinathannair\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jce.70033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are common in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), but their prognostic impact remains uncertain. Prior studies have yielded conflicting results regarding their association with mortality and morbidity. We aimed to evaluate the incidence and clinical outcomes associated with VAs in a large, multicenter LVAD cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 408 patients who underwent LVAD implantation across five centers between 2007 and 2015. VA was defined as sustained VAs lasting > 30 s or requiring ICD therapy. The effects of pre- and post-LVAD VA on clinical outcomes-including survival, hospitalizations, and ICD shocks-were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 408 patients, 254 (62%) had a history of pre-LVAD VA. Compared to those without prior VA, patients with pre-LVAD VA were more likely to be male (85% vs. 75%, p = 0.02), receive amiodarone (44% vs. 31%, p = 0.01), and have larger left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) (7.1 vs. 6.8 cm, p = 0.01). Postimplant, the pre-VA group had a significantly higher incidence of VA (73% vs. 37%, p < 0.0001), atrial arrhythmias (63% vs. 42%, p < 0.0001), ICD shocks (41% vs. 32%, p = 0.001), and cardiac hospitalizations (median 0.20 vs. 0.08 events/year, p = 0.0003). However, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no significant difference in overall mortality (log-rank p = 0.10). On multivariate Cox regression, pre-LVAD VA predicted post-LVAD VA, but LVEDD was the only independent predictor of mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this multicenter cohort, pre-LVAD VAs were strongly associated with postimplant arrhythmic burden and increased morbidity, but not with long-term mortality. These findings highlight the importance of structural factors such as LVEDD over arrhythmia history in survival outcomes and underscore the need for individualized arrhythmia surveillance and management strategies in LVAD recipients with prior VAs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.70033\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.70033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:室性心律失常(VAs)在使用左心室辅助装置(lvad)的患者中很常见,但其对预后的影响仍不确定。先前的研究对其与死亡率和发病率的关系得出了相互矛盾的结果。我们的目的是在一个大型、多中心的LVAD队列中评估与VAs相关的发生率和临床结果。方法:我们分析了2007年至2015年间在五个中心接受LVAD植入的408例患者。VA被定义为持续50 - 30秒或需要ICD治疗的持续VAs。评估了lvad前后的VA对临床结果的影响,包括生存、住院和ICD休克。结果:408例患者中,254例(62%)有lvad前期VA病史,男性患者(85% vs. 75%, p = 0.02)、接受胺碘酮治疗(44% vs. 31%, p = 0.01)、左室舒张末期尺寸(LVEDD)增大(7.1 vs. 6.8 cm, p = 0.01)的比例高于无lvad前期VA患者。结论:在这个多中心队列中,lvad前的VAs与植入后的心律失常负担和发病率增加密切相关,但与长期死亡率无关。这些研究结果强调了结构因素(如LVEDD)在生存结果中心律失常史的重要性,并强调了对先前有VAs的LVAD受者进行个体化心律失常监测和管理策略的必要性。
Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes With Ventricular Arrhythmias in Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients: A Multicenter Analysis.
Background: Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are common in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), but their prognostic impact remains uncertain. Prior studies have yielded conflicting results regarding their association with mortality and morbidity. We aimed to evaluate the incidence and clinical outcomes associated with VAs in a large, multicenter LVAD cohort.
Methods: We analyzed 408 patients who underwent LVAD implantation across five centers between 2007 and 2015. VA was defined as sustained VAs lasting > 30 s or requiring ICD therapy. The effects of pre- and post-LVAD VA on clinical outcomes-including survival, hospitalizations, and ICD shocks-were assessed.
Results: Of 408 patients, 254 (62%) had a history of pre-LVAD VA. Compared to those without prior VA, patients with pre-LVAD VA were more likely to be male (85% vs. 75%, p = 0.02), receive amiodarone (44% vs. 31%, p = 0.01), and have larger left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) (7.1 vs. 6.8 cm, p = 0.01). Postimplant, the pre-VA group had a significantly higher incidence of VA (73% vs. 37%, p < 0.0001), atrial arrhythmias (63% vs. 42%, p < 0.0001), ICD shocks (41% vs. 32%, p = 0.001), and cardiac hospitalizations (median 0.20 vs. 0.08 events/year, p = 0.0003). However, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no significant difference in overall mortality (log-rank p = 0.10). On multivariate Cox regression, pre-LVAD VA predicted post-LVAD VA, but LVEDD was the only independent predictor of mortality.
Conclusions: In this multicenter cohort, pre-LVAD VAs were strongly associated with postimplant arrhythmic burden and increased morbidity, but not with long-term mortality. These findings highlight the importance of structural factors such as LVEDD over arrhythmia history in survival outcomes and underscore the need for individualized arrhythmia surveillance and management strategies in LVAD recipients with prior VAs.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.