放射组学模型在预测卵巢恶性肿瘤中的价值:与O-RADS和放射科医生的回顾性多中心比较。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Junjie Jin, Xijia Deng, Ling Long, Meiling Liu, Meimei Cao, Hao Gong, Huan Liu, Xiaosong Lan, Lili Liu, Jiuquan Zhang
{"title":"放射组学模型在预测卵巢恶性肿瘤中的价值:与O-RADS和放射科医生的回顾性多中心比较。","authors":"Junjie Jin, Xijia Deng, Ling Long, Meiling Liu, Meimei Cao, Hao Gong, Huan Liu, Xiaosong Lan, Lili Liu, Jiuquan Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s13244-025-02047-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop an MRI-based radiomics model for ovarian masses categorization and to compare the model performance to Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) and radiologists' assessments.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective multicenter study included 497 patients (249 benign, 248 malignant) allocated to training, internal, and external validation sets (293/124/80 masses, respectively). Radiomics features were extracted from preoperative MRI. Features were selected using minimum redundancy, maximum relevance, and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm. Diagnostic performance of the radiomics model, O-RADS, and independent assessments by junior and senior radiologists was evaluated via the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and compared using DeLong's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In external validation, the radiomics model (AUC = 0.939) outperformed O-RADS (AUC = 0.862; p = 0.047) and the junior radiologist (AUC = 0.802; p = 0.003) and was similar to the senior radiologist (AUC = 0.886; p = 0.231). Subgroup analysis of O-RADS score 4 showed the model (AUC = 0.879) outperformed both radiologists (junior: p = 0.001; senior: p = 0.005). For solid, cystic-solids, and cystic masses, the AUCs of the model were 0.921, 0.975, and 0.848, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The performance of the radiomics model to categorize ovarian masses was superior to O-RADS and junior radiologists and similar to senior radiologists. As a complementary tool to O-RADS, it allows for refined risk stratification for ovarian masses with an O-RADS score of 4 and different morphological characteristics, providing clinicians with quantitative decision support to improve preoperative diagnosis and guide treatment planning.</p><p><strong>Critical relevance statement: </strong>Radiomics model provides improved risk stratification and supports precise clinical decision-making for ovarian masses with an O-RADS score of 4 and solid, cystic-solid ovarian masses, thereby improving the management of patients with ovarian masses.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>MRI-based radiomics allows for the characterization of ovarian masses with high accuracy. Radiomics helps differentiate between benign and malignant ovarian masses with an O-RADS score of 4. For solid, cystic-solid, and cystic masses, the radiomics model exhibited higher or similar performance to that of the O-RADS and radiologists.</p>","PeriodicalId":13639,"journal":{"name":"Insights into Imaging","volume":"16 1","pages":"163"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12314133/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The value of a radiomics model in predicting ovarian malignancy: a retrospective multi-center comparison with O-RADS and radiologists.\",\"authors\":\"Junjie Jin, Xijia Deng, Ling Long, Meiling Liu, Meimei Cao, Hao Gong, Huan Liu, Xiaosong Lan, Lili Liu, Jiuquan Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13244-025-02047-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop an MRI-based radiomics model for ovarian masses categorization and to compare the model performance to Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) and radiologists' assessments.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective multicenter study included 497 patients (249 benign, 248 malignant) allocated to training, internal, and external validation sets (293/124/80 masses, respectively). Radiomics features were extracted from preoperative MRI. Features were selected using minimum redundancy, maximum relevance, and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm. Diagnostic performance of the radiomics model, O-RADS, and independent assessments by junior and senior radiologists was evaluated via the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and compared using DeLong's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In external validation, the radiomics model (AUC = 0.939) outperformed O-RADS (AUC = 0.862; p = 0.047) and the junior radiologist (AUC = 0.802; p = 0.003) and was similar to the senior radiologist (AUC = 0.886; p = 0.231). Subgroup analysis of O-RADS score 4 showed the model (AUC = 0.879) outperformed both radiologists (junior: p = 0.001; senior: p = 0.005). For solid, cystic-solids, and cystic masses, the AUCs of the model were 0.921, 0.975, and 0.848, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The performance of the radiomics model to categorize ovarian masses was superior to O-RADS and junior radiologists and similar to senior radiologists. As a complementary tool to O-RADS, it allows for refined risk stratification for ovarian masses with an O-RADS score of 4 and different morphological characteristics, providing clinicians with quantitative decision support to improve preoperative diagnosis and guide treatment planning.</p><p><strong>Critical relevance statement: </strong>Radiomics model provides improved risk stratification and supports precise clinical decision-making for ovarian masses with an O-RADS score of 4 and solid, cystic-solid ovarian masses, thereby improving the management of patients with ovarian masses.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>MRI-based radiomics allows for the characterization of ovarian masses with high accuracy. Radiomics helps differentiate between benign and malignant ovarian masses with an O-RADS score of 4. For solid, cystic-solid, and cystic masses, the radiomics model exhibited higher or similar performance to that of the O-RADS and radiologists.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insights into Imaging\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12314133/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insights into Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-025-02047-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insights into Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-025-02047-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:建立一种基于mri的卵巢肿块分类放射组学模型,并将模型的性能与卵巢附件报告和数据系统(O-RADS)和放射科医生的评估进行比较。材料和方法:本回顾性多中心研究纳入497例患者(249例良性,248例恶性),分配到训练组、内部验证组和外部验证组(分别为293/124/80例)。术前MRI提取放射组学特征。特征选择使用最小冗余,最大的相关性,最小的绝对收缩和选择算子算法。通过受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评估放射组学模型、O-RADS和初级和高级放射科医生的独立评估的诊断性能,并使用DeLong测试进行比较。结果:在外部验证中,放射组学模型(AUC = 0.939)优于O-RADS (AUC = 0.862);p = 0.047)和初级放射科医师(AUC = 0.802;p = 0.003),与资深放射科医师相似(AUC = 0.886;p = 0.231)。O-RADS评分4的亚组分析显示,该模型(AUC = 0.879)优于两名放射科医生(初级:p = 0.001;老年人:p = 0.005)。对于固体、囊状固体和囊状肿块,模型的auc分别为0.921、0.975和0.848。结论:放射组学模型对卵巢肿块的分类优于O-RADS和初级放射科医生,与高级放射科医生相似。作为O-RADS的补充工具,它可以对O-RADS评分为4分的不同形态特征的卵巢肿块进行精细的风险分层,为临床医生提供定量决策支持,以提高术前诊断和指导治疗计划。关键相关性声明:放射组学模型为O-RADS评分为4分的卵巢肿块和实性、囊性-实性卵巢肿块提供了改进的风险分层,支持精确的临床决策,从而改善了卵巢肿块患者的管理。重点:基于mri的放射组学可以高精度地表征卵巢肿块。放射组学有助于区分良性和恶性卵巢肿块,O-RADS评分为4分。对于实性、囊性-实性和囊性肿块,放射组学模型表现出比O-RADS和放射科医生更高或相似的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The value of a radiomics model in predicting ovarian malignancy: a retrospective multi-center comparison with O-RADS and radiologists.

The value of a radiomics model in predicting ovarian malignancy: a retrospective multi-center comparison with O-RADS and radiologists.

The value of a radiomics model in predicting ovarian malignancy: a retrospective multi-center comparison with O-RADS and radiologists.

The value of a radiomics model in predicting ovarian malignancy: a retrospective multi-center comparison with O-RADS and radiologists.

Objectives: To develop an MRI-based radiomics model for ovarian masses categorization and to compare the model performance to Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) and radiologists' assessments.

Materials and methods: This retrospective multicenter study included 497 patients (249 benign, 248 malignant) allocated to training, internal, and external validation sets (293/124/80 masses, respectively). Radiomics features were extracted from preoperative MRI. Features were selected using minimum redundancy, maximum relevance, and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm. Diagnostic performance of the radiomics model, O-RADS, and independent assessments by junior and senior radiologists was evaluated via the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and compared using DeLong's test.

Results: In external validation, the radiomics model (AUC = 0.939) outperformed O-RADS (AUC = 0.862; p = 0.047) and the junior radiologist (AUC = 0.802; p = 0.003) and was similar to the senior radiologist (AUC = 0.886; p = 0.231). Subgroup analysis of O-RADS score 4 showed the model (AUC = 0.879) outperformed both radiologists (junior: p = 0.001; senior: p = 0.005). For solid, cystic-solids, and cystic masses, the AUCs of the model were 0.921, 0.975, and 0.848, respectively.

Conclusions: The performance of the radiomics model to categorize ovarian masses was superior to O-RADS and junior radiologists and similar to senior radiologists. As a complementary tool to O-RADS, it allows for refined risk stratification for ovarian masses with an O-RADS score of 4 and different morphological characteristics, providing clinicians with quantitative decision support to improve preoperative diagnosis and guide treatment planning.

Critical relevance statement: Radiomics model provides improved risk stratification and supports precise clinical decision-making for ovarian masses with an O-RADS score of 4 and solid, cystic-solid ovarian masses, thereby improving the management of patients with ovarian masses.

Key points: MRI-based radiomics allows for the characterization of ovarian masses with high accuracy. Radiomics helps differentiate between benign and malignant ovarian masses with an O-RADS score of 4. For solid, cystic-solid, and cystic masses, the radiomics model exhibited higher or similar performance to that of the O-RADS and radiologists.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Insights into Imaging
Insights into Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
182
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Insights into Imaging (I³) is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. All content published in the journal is freely available online to anyone, anywhere! I³ continuously updates scientific knowledge and progress in best-practice standards in radiology through the publication of original articles and state-of-the-art reviews and opinions, along with recommendations and statements from the leading radiological societies in Europe. Founded by the European Society of Radiology (ESR), I³ creates a platform for educational material, guidelines and recommendations, and a forum for topics of controversy. A balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes I³ an indispensable source for current information in this field. I³ is owned by the ESR, however authors retain copyright to their article according to the Creative Commons Attribution License (see Copyright and License Agreement). All articles can be read, redistributed and reused for free, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. The open access fees (article-processing charges) for this journal are kindly sponsored by ESR for all Members. The journal went open access in 2012, which means that all articles published since then are freely available online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信