连续血糖监测指标和持续血糖监测为基础的低血糖,包括持续时间,在1型糖尿病患者转换为每周一次胰岛素治疗:一个事后评估6。

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Thomas Danne, Susanne Engberg, Concetta Irace, Maiken Ina Siegismund Kjaersgaard, David C Klonoff, Chantal Mathieu, Sara Kehlet Watt, David Russell-Jones
{"title":"连续血糖监测指标和持续血糖监测为基础的低血糖,包括持续时间,在1型糖尿病患者转换为每周一次胰岛素治疗:一个事后评估6。","authors":"Thomas Danne, Susanne Engberg, Concetta Irace, Maiken Ina Siegismund Kjaersgaard, David C Klonoff, Chantal Mathieu, Sara Kehlet Watt, David Russell-Jones","doi":"10.1177/15209156251359319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Post hoc evaluation of ONWARDS 6 assessed continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics and CGM-based hypoglycemia with once-weekly insulin icodec (icodec) and once-daily insulin degludec (degludec) in adults with type 1 diabetes. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Open CGM data were collected throughout ONWARDS 6. During weeks 0-4, 22-26, and 48-52, time in range (TIR; 3.9-10.0 mmol/L), time above range (TAR; >10.0 mmol/L), and time below range (TBR; <3.9 and <3.0 mmol/L) were assessed by treatment day after icodec injection or degludec titration. Rates of CGM-based clinically significant hypoglycemic episodes (<3.0 mmol/L for ≥15 consecutive min) and durations of CGM-based hypoglycemic episodes (<3.9 mmol/L) and CGM-based periods <3.0 mmol/L were reported (baseline to weeks 26 and 57). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Although rates of overall CGM-based clinically significant hypoglycemia were statistically significantly higher with icodec than degludec from baseline to week 26 and week 57, estimated rate ratios (icodec/degludec) for CGM-based clinically significant hypoglycemic episodes were lower than those estimated from self-measured blood glucose (SMBG) data from baseline to week 26 (1.38 vs. 1.88) and to week 57 (1.28 vs. 1.79). Observed percentage of TIR was highest on days 2-4 after icodec injection with a concomitant reduction in TAR and an increase in TBR. Median duration of CGM-based hypoglycemic episodes was comparable between treatment arms from baseline to week 26 (icodec: 35 min; degludec: 30 min) and to week 57 (35 min for both treatments). Median duration of CGM-based periods <3.0 mmol/L was the same for both treatments at week 26 and week 57 (25 min). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> In adults with type 1 diabetes, estimated rate ratios for CGM-based clinically significant hypoglycemia were lower than those estimated from SMBG data, although still favoring degludec with estimated rate ratios of 1.28-1.38. CGM metrics varied by treatment day after icodec injection, but median duration of CGM-based hypoglycemia was comparable between treatment arms.</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics and Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Based Hypoglycemia, Including Duration, in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes Switching to Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec: A Post Hoc Evaluation of ONWARDS 6.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Danne, Susanne Engberg, Concetta Irace, Maiken Ina Siegismund Kjaersgaard, David C Klonoff, Chantal Mathieu, Sara Kehlet Watt, David Russell-Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15209156251359319\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Post hoc evaluation of ONWARDS 6 assessed continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics and CGM-based hypoglycemia with once-weekly insulin icodec (icodec) and once-daily insulin degludec (degludec) in adults with type 1 diabetes. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Open CGM data were collected throughout ONWARDS 6. During weeks 0-4, 22-26, and 48-52, time in range (TIR; 3.9-10.0 mmol/L), time above range (TAR; >10.0 mmol/L), and time below range (TBR; <3.9 and <3.0 mmol/L) were assessed by treatment day after icodec injection or degludec titration. Rates of CGM-based clinically significant hypoglycemic episodes (<3.0 mmol/L for ≥15 consecutive min) and durations of CGM-based hypoglycemic episodes (<3.9 mmol/L) and CGM-based periods <3.0 mmol/L were reported (baseline to weeks 26 and 57). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Although rates of overall CGM-based clinically significant hypoglycemia were statistically significantly higher with icodec than degludec from baseline to week 26 and week 57, estimated rate ratios (icodec/degludec) for CGM-based clinically significant hypoglycemic episodes were lower than those estimated from self-measured blood glucose (SMBG) data from baseline to week 26 (1.38 vs. 1.88) and to week 57 (1.28 vs. 1.79). Observed percentage of TIR was highest on days 2-4 after icodec injection with a concomitant reduction in TAR and an increase in TBR. Median duration of CGM-based hypoglycemic episodes was comparable between treatment arms from baseline to week 26 (icodec: 35 min; degludec: 30 min) and to week 57 (35 min for both treatments). Median duration of CGM-based periods <3.0 mmol/L was the same for both treatments at week 26 and week 57 (25 min). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> In adults with type 1 diabetes, estimated rate ratios for CGM-based clinically significant hypoglycemia were lower than those estimated from SMBG data, although still favoring degludec with estimated rate ratios of 1.28-1.38. CGM metrics varied by treatment day after icodec injection, but median duration of CGM-based hypoglycemia was comparable between treatment arms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes technology & therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes technology & therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15209156251359319\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15209156251359319","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对成人1型糖尿病患者的持续血糖监测(CGM)指标和基于CGM的低血糖,每周1次胰岛素icodec (icodec)和每天1次胰岛素degludec (degludec)进行事后评估。方法:在整个6期中收集开放的CGM数据。在0-4周,22-26周和48-52周,时间范围(TIR;3.9-10.0 mmol/L),时间高于范围(TAR;>10.0 mmol/L),低于范围时间(TBR;结果:尽管从基线到第26周和第57周,icodec的总体基于cgm的临床显著性低血糖发生率显著高于degludec,但基于cgm的临床显著性低血糖发作的估计比率(icodec/degludec)低于基线到第26周(1.38 vs. 1.88)和第57周(1.28 vs. 1.79)自测血糖(SMBG)数据的估计比率。观察到的TIR百分比在注射icodec后第2-4天最高,同时TAR降低,TBR增加。从基线到第26周,两组间基于cgm的低血糖发作的中位持续时间相当(icodec: 35分钟;Degludec: 30分钟)至第57周(两种治疗均为35分钟)。结论:在成人1型糖尿病患者中,基于cgm的临床显著性低血糖的估计比率低于SMBG数据的估计比率,尽管仍倾向于degludec,估计比率为1.28-1.38。注射icodec后,CGM指标随治疗日的不同而变化,但两组间基于CGM的低血糖的中位持续时间具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics and Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Based Hypoglycemia, Including Duration, in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes Switching to Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec: A Post Hoc Evaluation of ONWARDS 6.

Background: Post hoc evaluation of ONWARDS 6 assessed continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics and CGM-based hypoglycemia with once-weekly insulin icodec (icodec) and once-daily insulin degludec (degludec) in adults with type 1 diabetes. Methods: Open CGM data were collected throughout ONWARDS 6. During weeks 0-4, 22-26, and 48-52, time in range (TIR; 3.9-10.0 mmol/L), time above range (TAR; >10.0 mmol/L), and time below range (TBR; <3.9 and <3.0 mmol/L) were assessed by treatment day after icodec injection or degludec titration. Rates of CGM-based clinically significant hypoglycemic episodes (<3.0 mmol/L for ≥15 consecutive min) and durations of CGM-based hypoglycemic episodes (<3.9 mmol/L) and CGM-based periods <3.0 mmol/L were reported (baseline to weeks 26 and 57). Results: Although rates of overall CGM-based clinically significant hypoglycemia were statistically significantly higher with icodec than degludec from baseline to week 26 and week 57, estimated rate ratios (icodec/degludec) for CGM-based clinically significant hypoglycemic episodes were lower than those estimated from self-measured blood glucose (SMBG) data from baseline to week 26 (1.38 vs. 1.88) and to week 57 (1.28 vs. 1.79). Observed percentage of TIR was highest on days 2-4 after icodec injection with a concomitant reduction in TAR and an increase in TBR. Median duration of CGM-based hypoglycemic episodes was comparable between treatment arms from baseline to week 26 (icodec: 35 min; degludec: 30 min) and to week 57 (35 min for both treatments). Median duration of CGM-based periods <3.0 mmol/L was the same for both treatments at week 26 and week 57 (25 min). Conclusion: In adults with type 1 diabetes, estimated rate ratios for CGM-based clinically significant hypoglycemia were lower than those estimated from SMBG data, although still favoring degludec with estimated rate ratios of 1.28-1.38. CGM metrics varied by treatment day after icodec injection, but median duration of CGM-based hypoglycemia was comparable between treatment arms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes technology & therapeutics
Diabetes technology & therapeutics 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
14.80%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信