{"title":"后椎板切除术+侧块螺钉固定+ 1-2节段椎板成形术治疗脊髓型颈椎病。","authors":"Chuang Li, Jingfeng Li, Qixin Zheng","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective, observational study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of cervical posterior laminectomy with lateral mass screw internal fixation combined with 1-2 levels of laminoplasty in patients with severe complex cervical spondylotic myelopathy.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>In this single-center retrospective observational study, data collected from 15 patients who underwent modified cervical posterior laminectomy with lateral mass screw internal fixation (modified PLF group) were compared with those from 45 patients who underwent standard cervical posterior laminectomy with lateral mass screw internal fixation (PLF group) during the same period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cervical curvature, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, visual analog scale (VAS), neck disability index (NDI), Odom's grade, and development of C5 nerve palsy were compared preoperatively and postoperatively. A power analysis was conducted to determine the sample size required to detect clinically significant differences between the groups. Based on an expected effect size of 0.5, a significance level (α) of 0.05, and a power (1-β) of 80%, the analysis indicated that a minimum of 60 patients per group would be needed. The mean follow-up period was 3.5 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant reduction in the extent of cervical kyphosis (P<0.05) was observed at the last follow-up in both groups. There were no significant differences in the JOA score, VAS, and NDI, all of which significantly improved in both groups. The rates of excellent and good Odom's grading (100% and 88.89% in the modified PLF and PLF groups, respectively) and the incidence of C5 nerve palsy (0% and 11.11% in the modified PLF and PLF groups, respectively) were significantly different between the 2 groups (P<0.05). The power analysis confirmed that the study was adequately powered to detect significant differences in cervical curvature and clinical outcomes, although the smaller sample size of the modified PLF group (n=15) may have limited the ability to detect smaller but clinically meaningful differences in secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Modified cervical posterior laminectomy with lateral mass screw internal fixation achieved improved clinical outcomes after medium-to-long-term follow-up in patients with severe and complex cervical spondylotic myelopathy. It can stabilize the cervical spine, fully decompress the spinal canal, and prevent excessive backward drifting of the cervical spinal cord, thereby reducing cervical spinal cord injury and C5 nerve palsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Posterior Laminectomy and Lateral Mass Screw Fixation With 1-2 Levels Laminoplasty for the Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.\",\"authors\":\"Chuang Li, Jingfeng Li, Qixin Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective, observational study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of cervical posterior laminectomy with lateral mass screw internal fixation combined with 1-2 levels of laminoplasty in patients with severe complex cervical spondylotic myelopathy.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>In this single-center retrospective observational study, data collected from 15 patients who underwent modified cervical posterior laminectomy with lateral mass screw internal fixation (modified PLF group) were compared with those from 45 patients who underwent standard cervical posterior laminectomy with lateral mass screw internal fixation (PLF group) during the same period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cervical curvature, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, visual analog scale (VAS), neck disability index (NDI), Odom's grade, and development of C5 nerve palsy were compared preoperatively and postoperatively. A power analysis was conducted to determine the sample size required to detect clinically significant differences between the groups. Based on an expected effect size of 0.5, a significance level (α) of 0.05, and a power (1-β) of 80%, the analysis indicated that a minimum of 60 patients per group would be needed. The mean follow-up period was 3.5 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant reduction in the extent of cervical kyphosis (P<0.05) was observed at the last follow-up in both groups. There were no significant differences in the JOA score, VAS, and NDI, all of which significantly improved in both groups. The rates of excellent and good Odom's grading (100% and 88.89% in the modified PLF and PLF groups, respectively) and the incidence of C5 nerve palsy (0% and 11.11% in the modified PLF and PLF groups, respectively) were significantly different between the 2 groups (P<0.05). The power analysis confirmed that the study was adequately powered to detect significant differences in cervical curvature and clinical outcomes, although the smaller sample size of the modified PLF group (n=15) may have limited the ability to detect smaller but clinically meaningful differences in secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Modified cervical posterior laminectomy with lateral mass screw internal fixation achieved improved clinical outcomes after medium-to-long-term follow-up in patients with severe and complex cervical spondylotic myelopathy. It can stabilize the cervical spine, fully decompress the spinal canal, and prevent excessive backward drifting of the cervical spinal cord, thereby reducing cervical spinal cord injury and C5 nerve palsy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001878\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001878","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Posterior Laminectomy and Lateral Mass Screw Fixation With 1-2 Levels Laminoplasty for the Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.
Study design: Retrospective, observational study.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of cervical posterior laminectomy with lateral mass screw internal fixation combined with 1-2 levels of laminoplasty in patients with severe complex cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Summary of background data: In this single-center retrospective observational study, data collected from 15 patients who underwent modified cervical posterior laminectomy with lateral mass screw internal fixation (modified PLF group) were compared with those from 45 patients who underwent standard cervical posterior laminectomy with lateral mass screw internal fixation (PLF group) during the same period.
Methods: The cervical curvature, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, visual analog scale (VAS), neck disability index (NDI), Odom's grade, and development of C5 nerve palsy were compared preoperatively and postoperatively. A power analysis was conducted to determine the sample size required to detect clinically significant differences between the groups. Based on an expected effect size of 0.5, a significance level (α) of 0.05, and a power (1-β) of 80%, the analysis indicated that a minimum of 60 patients per group would be needed. The mean follow-up period was 3.5 years.
Results: A significant reduction in the extent of cervical kyphosis (P<0.05) was observed at the last follow-up in both groups. There were no significant differences in the JOA score, VAS, and NDI, all of which significantly improved in both groups. The rates of excellent and good Odom's grading (100% and 88.89% in the modified PLF and PLF groups, respectively) and the incidence of C5 nerve palsy (0% and 11.11% in the modified PLF and PLF groups, respectively) were significantly different between the 2 groups (P<0.05). The power analysis confirmed that the study was adequately powered to detect significant differences in cervical curvature and clinical outcomes, although the smaller sample size of the modified PLF group (n=15) may have limited the ability to detect smaller but clinically meaningful differences in secondary outcomes.
Conclusions: Modified cervical posterior laminectomy with lateral mass screw internal fixation achieved improved clinical outcomes after medium-to-long-term follow-up in patients with severe and complex cervical spondylotic myelopathy. It can stabilize the cervical spine, fully decompress the spinal canal, and prevent excessive backward drifting of the cervical spinal cord, thereby reducing cervical spinal cord injury and C5 nerve palsy.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure.
Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.