Nouf Aljahdali, Andrea S Doria, Carina Man, Joshua Ramjist, Michael Bravo, Adrienne Davis, Keren Shahar-Nissan, Reut Ram, Annie Daviko, Suzanne Schuh
{"title":"使用儿童阑尾炎风险计算器识别超声阳性和阑尾炎的儿童:回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Nouf Aljahdali, Andrea S Doria, Carina Man, Joshua Ramjist, Michael Bravo, Adrienne Davis, Keren Shahar-Nissan, Reut Ram, Annie Daviko, Suzanne Schuh","doi":"10.1111/acem.70118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Up to 10% of positive ultrasounds (US) for suspected pediatric appendicitis are false positive. Minimizing the negative appendectomy rate is gaining importance as a quality indicator, with a proposed benchmark of < 2%. The validated Pediatric Appendicitis Risk Calculator (pARC) score [range 0%-100%] used alone identifies the entire appendicitis risk spectrum, whereas the optimal surgical candidates should be at a very high risk. Therefore, pARC risk stratification in conjunction with positive US may be useful to identify the best surgical candidates. The primary objective was to determine the proportion of children with positive US plus medium-high risk pARC ≥ 25% with appendicitis.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>We hypothesized this proportion would be 98%, with lower 95% CI ≥ 96%.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of 327 previously healthy children 4-17 years old at a pediatric ED with suspected appendicitis and positive US interpretations. Four investigators abstracted demographic, clinical, and imaging data. pARC includes seven demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables and is quantified according to the published formula. The primary outcome was appendicitis, based on pathology. All non-operated patients underwent a follow-up to exclude missed appendicitis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 294/327 (89.9%) patients with positive US had pathology-proven appendicitis, and 33 (10.1%) had no appendicitis; pARC ≥ 25% was assigned to 259/327 (79.2%) patients. In total, 255/259 (98.5%) children with pARC ≥ 25% had pathology-proven appendicitis (95% CI 96.1-99.6) versus 39/68 (57.3%) with pARC < 25%; p < 0.0001. Probability of no appendicitis increased with decreasing pARC cut-offs from 0/230 (0%) for pARC ≥ 40% to 13/284 [4.6% (2.5-7.7)] for pARC ≥ 15%. The pARC ≥ 25% plus positive US combination had sensitivity 86.7% (82.3-90.4), specificity 87.9% (71.8-96.6), positive predictive value 98.5% (96.1-99.6), and negative predictive value 42.6% (30.7-55.2).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In children with suspected appendicitis, a combination of positive US and pARC ≥ 25% carries a very high probability of appendicitis. Children with lower pARCs may be candidates for clinical re-evaluation or further imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification of Children With a Positive Ultrasound and Appendicitis Using the Pediatric Appendicitis Risk Calculator: Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Nouf Aljahdali, Andrea S Doria, Carina Man, Joshua Ramjist, Michael Bravo, Adrienne Davis, Keren Shahar-Nissan, Reut Ram, Annie Daviko, Suzanne Schuh\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/acem.70118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Up to 10% of positive ultrasounds (US) for suspected pediatric appendicitis are false positive. Minimizing the negative appendectomy rate is gaining importance as a quality indicator, with a proposed benchmark of < 2%. The validated Pediatric Appendicitis Risk Calculator (pARC) score [range 0%-100%] used alone identifies the entire appendicitis risk spectrum, whereas the optimal surgical candidates should be at a very high risk. Therefore, pARC risk stratification in conjunction with positive US may be useful to identify the best surgical candidates. The primary objective was to determine the proportion of children with positive US plus medium-high risk pARC ≥ 25% with appendicitis.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>We hypothesized this proportion would be 98%, with lower 95% CI ≥ 96%.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of 327 previously healthy children 4-17 years old at a pediatric ED with suspected appendicitis and positive US interpretations. Four investigators abstracted demographic, clinical, and imaging data. pARC includes seven demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables and is quantified according to the published formula. The primary outcome was appendicitis, based on pathology. All non-operated patients underwent a follow-up to exclude missed appendicitis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 294/327 (89.9%) patients with positive US had pathology-proven appendicitis, and 33 (10.1%) had no appendicitis; pARC ≥ 25% was assigned to 259/327 (79.2%) patients. In total, 255/259 (98.5%) children with pARC ≥ 25% had pathology-proven appendicitis (95% CI 96.1-99.6) versus 39/68 (57.3%) with pARC < 25%; p < 0.0001. Probability of no appendicitis increased with decreasing pARC cut-offs from 0/230 (0%) for pARC ≥ 40% to 13/284 [4.6% (2.5-7.7)] for pARC ≥ 15%. The pARC ≥ 25% plus positive US combination had sensitivity 86.7% (82.3-90.4), specificity 87.9% (71.8-96.6), positive predictive value 98.5% (96.1-99.6), and negative predictive value 42.6% (30.7-55.2).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In children with suspected appendicitis, a combination of positive US and pARC ≥ 25% carries a very high probability of appendicitis. Children with lower pARCs may be candidates for clinical re-evaluation or further imaging.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.70118\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.70118","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:高达10%的阳性超声(美国)怀疑小儿阑尾炎是假阳性。最小化阑尾切除阴性率作为一项质量指标越来越重要,我们提出了假设基准:我们假设这一比例为98%,95% CI≤96%。方法:对327名既往健康的4-17岁儿童进行回顾性队列研究,这些儿童在儿科急诊科疑似阑尾炎并有阳性的US解释。四名研究者提取了人口统计学、临床和影像学数据。pARC包括7个人口统计、临床和实验室变量,并根据公布的公式进行量化。根据病理,主要结局是阑尾炎。所有未手术的患者都进行了随访,以排除遗漏的阑尾炎。结果:327例US阳性患者中有294/327例(89.9%)有病理证实的阑尾炎,33例(10.1%)无阑尾炎;pARC≥25%分配给259/327例(79.2%)患者。总的来说,pARC≥25%的儿童中有255/259(98.5%)患有病理证实的阑尾炎(95% CI 961 -99.6),而pARC为39/68(57.3%)。结论:在疑似阑尾炎的儿童中,US阳性和pARC≥25%的合并具有非常高的阑尾炎可能性。pARCs较低的儿童可能需要临床重新评估或进一步影像学检查。
Identification of Children With a Positive Ultrasound and Appendicitis Using the Pediatric Appendicitis Risk Calculator: Retrospective Cohort Study.
Objectives: Up to 10% of positive ultrasounds (US) for suspected pediatric appendicitis are false positive. Minimizing the negative appendectomy rate is gaining importance as a quality indicator, with a proposed benchmark of < 2%. The validated Pediatric Appendicitis Risk Calculator (pARC) score [range 0%-100%] used alone identifies the entire appendicitis risk spectrum, whereas the optimal surgical candidates should be at a very high risk. Therefore, pARC risk stratification in conjunction with positive US may be useful to identify the best surgical candidates. The primary objective was to determine the proportion of children with positive US plus medium-high risk pARC ≥ 25% with appendicitis.
Hypothesis: We hypothesized this proportion would be 98%, with lower 95% CI ≥ 96%.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 327 previously healthy children 4-17 years old at a pediatric ED with suspected appendicitis and positive US interpretations. Four investigators abstracted demographic, clinical, and imaging data. pARC includes seven demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables and is quantified according to the published formula. The primary outcome was appendicitis, based on pathology. All non-operated patients underwent a follow-up to exclude missed appendicitis.
Results: A total of 294/327 (89.9%) patients with positive US had pathology-proven appendicitis, and 33 (10.1%) had no appendicitis; pARC ≥ 25% was assigned to 259/327 (79.2%) patients. In total, 255/259 (98.5%) children with pARC ≥ 25% had pathology-proven appendicitis (95% CI 96.1-99.6) versus 39/68 (57.3%) with pARC < 25%; p < 0.0001. Probability of no appendicitis increased with decreasing pARC cut-offs from 0/230 (0%) for pARC ≥ 40% to 13/284 [4.6% (2.5-7.7)] for pARC ≥ 15%. The pARC ≥ 25% plus positive US combination had sensitivity 86.7% (82.3-90.4), specificity 87.9% (71.8-96.6), positive predictive value 98.5% (96.1-99.6), and negative predictive value 42.6% (30.7-55.2).
Conclusions: In children with suspected appendicitis, a combination of positive US and pARC ≥ 25% carries a very high probability of appendicitis. Children with lower pARCs may be candidates for clinical re-evaluation or further imaging.
期刊介绍:
Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) is the official monthly publication of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and publishes information relevant to the practice, educational advancements, and investigation of emergency medicine. It is the second-largest peer-reviewed scientific journal in the specialty of emergency medicine.
The goal of AEM is to advance the science, education, and clinical practice of emergency medicine, to serve as a voice for the academic emergency medicine community, and to promote SAEM''s goals and objectives. Members and non-members worldwide depend on this journal for translational medicine relevant to emergency medicine, as well as for clinical news, case studies and more.
Each issue contains information relevant to the research, educational advancements, and practice in emergency medicine. Subject matter is diverse, including preclinical studies, clinical topics, health policy, and educational methods. The research of SAEM members contributes significantly to the scientific content and development of the journal.