使用DeepLabCut的狗的步态跟踪:一种用于控制设置的无标记机器学习方法

IF 2 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Harry Gill , James Charles , Robyn Grant , James Gardiner , Karl Bates , Charlotte Brassey
{"title":"使用DeepLabCut的狗的步态跟踪:一种用于控制设置的无标记机器学习方法","authors":"Harry Gill ,&nbsp;James Charles ,&nbsp;Robyn Grant ,&nbsp;James Gardiner ,&nbsp;Karl Bates ,&nbsp;Charlotte Brassey","doi":"10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Analysing locomotion is critical for assessing canine health and diagnosing musculoskeletal conditions, yet traditional motion capture methods for dog gait analysis remain impractical in many clinical and industry settings. Markerless deep-learning approaches, such as DeepLabCut (DLC), offer a promising alternative, but their performance in gait analysis, particularly across diverse dog breeds, remains largely untested. In addition, the ability to automate aspects of gait parameter extraction from the resulting dataset, an important requirement for industry practitioners, is also widely untested. In this study, we trained a bespoke neural network on a 2100 training frames, for 2D markerless tracking on eight dog breeds and developed a scripted workflow for semi-automated gait parameter extraction. We calculated several temporal and kinematic variables, including duty factor and joint ranges of motion, comparing values of a widely studied breed (Labrador Retrievers) to literature data. Our model’s performance aligned with previous DLC studies, performing strongly on well-defined landmarks (E.g. nose, eye, carpal, tarsal), whilst struggling with less morphologically discrete locations (E.g. shoulder, hip). ANOVA results from our mixed model revealed a significant effect of body part on tracking performance (p = 0.003), yet no significant effect of breed (p = 0.828) and a small interaction effect between breed and body part (p = 0.049). Our semi-automated workflow successfully extracted gait parameters across our study breeds, though performance was highly dependent on the quality of underlying tracking data. Duty factor and stifle range of motion measures from our labradors showed good overlap with literature values, yet the broader distribution in our data highlighted important limitations in cross-study comparisons. These results suggest that a markerless deep-learning approach could provide a viable alternative to traditional motion capture for canine gait analysis, offering potential applications for both clinical and industry settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8222,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","volume":"292 ","pages":"Article 106769"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gait tracking in dogs using DeepLabCut: A markerless machine learning approach for controlled settings\",\"authors\":\"Harry Gill ,&nbsp;James Charles ,&nbsp;Robyn Grant ,&nbsp;James Gardiner ,&nbsp;Karl Bates ,&nbsp;Charlotte Brassey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106769\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Analysing locomotion is critical for assessing canine health and diagnosing musculoskeletal conditions, yet traditional motion capture methods for dog gait analysis remain impractical in many clinical and industry settings. Markerless deep-learning approaches, such as DeepLabCut (DLC), offer a promising alternative, but their performance in gait analysis, particularly across diverse dog breeds, remains largely untested. In addition, the ability to automate aspects of gait parameter extraction from the resulting dataset, an important requirement for industry practitioners, is also widely untested. In this study, we trained a bespoke neural network on a 2100 training frames, for 2D markerless tracking on eight dog breeds and developed a scripted workflow for semi-automated gait parameter extraction. We calculated several temporal and kinematic variables, including duty factor and joint ranges of motion, comparing values of a widely studied breed (Labrador Retrievers) to literature data. Our model’s performance aligned with previous DLC studies, performing strongly on well-defined landmarks (E.g. nose, eye, carpal, tarsal), whilst struggling with less morphologically discrete locations (E.g. shoulder, hip). ANOVA results from our mixed model revealed a significant effect of body part on tracking performance (p = 0.003), yet no significant effect of breed (p = 0.828) and a small interaction effect between breed and body part (p = 0.049). Our semi-automated workflow successfully extracted gait parameters across our study breeds, though performance was highly dependent on the quality of underlying tracking data. Duty factor and stifle range of motion measures from our labradors showed good overlap with literature values, yet the broader distribution in our data highlighted important limitations in cross-study comparisons. These results suggest that a markerless deep-learning approach could provide a viable alternative to traditional motion capture for canine gait analysis, offering potential applications for both clinical and industry settings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Animal Behaviour Science\",\"volume\":\"292 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106769\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Animal Behaviour Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159125002679\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159125002679","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分析运动对于评估犬类健康和诊断肌肉骨骼状况至关重要,然而传统的运动捕捉方法用于犬类步态分析在许多临床和工业环境中仍然不切实际。无标记深度学习方法,如DeepLabCut (DLC),提供了一个很有前途的替代方案,但它们在步态分析方面的表现,特别是在不同犬种的步态分析方面,在很大程度上仍未经测试。此外,从结果数据集中自动提取步态参数的能力,这是行业从业者的重要要求,也广泛未经测试。在这项研究中,我们在2100个训练帧上训练了一个定制的神经网络,用于对8个品种的狗进行二维无标记跟踪,并开发了一个半自动化步态参数提取的脚本工作流程。我们计算了几个时间和运动学变量,包括工作因素和关节运动范围,将广泛研究的品种(拉布拉多寻回犬)的值与文献数据进行比较。我们的模型的性能与之前的DLC研究一致,在定义明确的地标(如鼻子、眼睛、腕、跗骨)上表现出色,同时在较少形态学离散的位置(如肩膀、臀部)上挣扎。混合模型的方差分析结果显示,身体部位对跟踪性能有显著影响(p = 0.003),而品种对跟踪性能无显著影响(p = 0.828),品种与身体部位的交互作用较小(p = 0.049)。我们的半自动化工作流程成功地提取了我们研究品种的步态参数,尽管性能高度依赖于底层跟踪数据的质量。我们的拉布拉多犬的占空系数和抑制运动范围测量结果与文献值有很好的重叠,但我们的数据分布较广,这突出了交叉研究比较的重要局限性。这些结果表明,无标记深度学习方法可以为犬类步态分析提供传统动作捕捉的可行替代方案,为临床和工业环境提供潜在应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gait tracking in dogs using DeepLabCut: A markerless machine learning approach for controlled settings
Analysing locomotion is critical for assessing canine health and diagnosing musculoskeletal conditions, yet traditional motion capture methods for dog gait analysis remain impractical in many clinical and industry settings. Markerless deep-learning approaches, such as DeepLabCut (DLC), offer a promising alternative, but their performance in gait analysis, particularly across diverse dog breeds, remains largely untested. In addition, the ability to automate aspects of gait parameter extraction from the resulting dataset, an important requirement for industry practitioners, is also widely untested. In this study, we trained a bespoke neural network on a 2100 training frames, for 2D markerless tracking on eight dog breeds and developed a scripted workflow for semi-automated gait parameter extraction. We calculated several temporal and kinematic variables, including duty factor and joint ranges of motion, comparing values of a widely studied breed (Labrador Retrievers) to literature data. Our model’s performance aligned with previous DLC studies, performing strongly on well-defined landmarks (E.g. nose, eye, carpal, tarsal), whilst struggling with less morphologically discrete locations (E.g. shoulder, hip). ANOVA results from our mixed model revealed a significant effect of body part on tracking performance (p = 0.003), yet no significant effect of breed (p = 0.828) and a small interaction effect between breed and body part (p = 0.049). Our semi-automated workflow successfully extracted gait parameters across our study breeds, though performance was highly dependent on the quality of underlying tracking data. Duty factor and stifle range of motion measures from our labradors showed good overlap with literature values, yet the broader distribution in our data highlighted important limitations in cross-study comparisons. These results suggest that a markerless deep-learning approach could provide a viable alternative to traditional motion capture for canine gait analysis, offering potential applications for both clinical and industry settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Applied Animal Behaviour Science 农林科学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
21.70%
发文量
191
审稿时长
18.1 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal publishes relevant information on the behaviour of domesticated and utilized animals. Topics covered include: -Behaviour of farm, zoo and laboratory animals in relation to animal management and welfare -Behaviour of companion animals in relation to behavioural problems, for example, in relation to the training of dogs for different purposes, in relation to behavioural problems -Studies of the behaviour of wild animals when these studies are relevant from an applied perspective, for example in relation to wildlife management, pest management or nature conservation -Methodological studies within relevant fields The principal subjects are farm, companion and laboratory animals, including, of course, poultry. The journal also deals with the following animal subjects: -Those involved in any farming system, e.g. deer, rabbits and fur-bearing animals -Those in ANY form of confinement, e.g. zoos, safari parks and other forms of display -Feral animals, and any animal species which impinge on farming operations, e.g. as causes of loss or damage -Species used for hunting, recreation etc. may also be considered as acceptable subjects in some instances -Laboratory animals, if the material relates to their behavioural requirements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信