向人工智能增强医疗保健转变：瑞典医生的经验

IF 10.9 1区管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL

Technovation Pub Date : 2025-08-02 DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103333

Muhammad Ismail , Henrik Barth , Magnus Holmén , Lena Petersson , Luís Irgang

{"title":"向人工智能增强医疗保健转变：瑞典医生的经验","authors":"Muhammad Ismail , Henrik Barth , Magnus Holmén , Lena Petersson , Luís Irgang","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent advancements in connectivity and automation driven by artificial intelligence (AI) is leading to transformative changes in the healthcare sector. This study investigates physicians' experience of AI-based technologies in healthcare. To achieve this objective, we gathered responses through open-ended essays from 326 physicians working in Swedish healthcare. These respondents have experience in using AI technologies for distinct tasks, which include prediction, diagnosis, medical image analysis, text generation, analysis, chatbots, wearable devices, telemedicine and robot assistance. The data was analyzed by thematic coding. The findings show that the physicians’ perception towards use of AI in healthcare is influenced by drivers and barriers that are present at macro, organizational, system and personal level. The identified drivers include work task changes, functional aspects, organizational aspects, system characteristics and personal motivators. The barriers include legal and ethical dilemma, organizational readiness, system limitations and personal demotivators. This study leverages paradox theory as a framework to deepen the understanding of the complexities and interconnections between perceived barriers and potential solutions related to AI in healthcare as a contribution to the literature.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":"148 ","pages":"Article 103333"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transforming towards AI-augmented Healthcare: Experiences of physicians in Sweden\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Ismail , Henrik Barth , Magnus Holmén , Lena Petersson , Luís Irgang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Recent advancements in connectivity and automation driven by artificial intelligence (AI) is leading to transformative changes in the healthcare sector. This study investigates physicians' experience of AI-based technologies in healthcare. To achieve this objective, we gathered responses through open-ended essays from 326 physicians working in Swedish healthcare. These respondents have experience in using AI technologies for distinct tasks, which include prediction, diagnosis, medical image analysis, text generation, analysis, chatbots, wearable devices, telemedicine and robot assistance. The data was analyzed by thematic coding. The findings show that the physicians’ perception towards use of AI in healthcare is influenced by drivers and barriers that are present at macro, organizational, system and personal level. The identified drivers include work task changes, functional aspects, organizational aspects, system characteristics and personal motivators. The barriers include legal and ethical dilemma, organizational readiness, system limitations and personal demotivators. This study leverages paradox theory as a framework to deepen the understanding of the complexities and interconnections between perceived barriers and potential solutions related to AI in healthcare as a contribution to the literature.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technovation\",\"volume\":\"148 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497225001658\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497225001658","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

由人工智能（AI）驱动的连接和自动化的最新进展正在导致医疗保健行业的变革。本研究调查了医生在医疗保健中使用人工智能技术的经验。为了实现这一目标，我们通过开放性文章收集了326名瑞典医疗保健医生的反馈。这些受访者在使用人工智能技术完成不同任务方面有经验，包括预测、诊断、医学图像分析、文本生成、分析、聊天机器人、可穿戴设备、远程医疗和机器人辅助。对数据进行专题编码分析。研究结果表明，医生对在医疗保健中使用人工智能的看法受到宏观、组织、系统和个人层面存在的驱动因素和障碍的影响。确定的驱动因素包括工作任务变化、功能方面、组织方面、系统特征和个人激励因素。障碍包括法律和道德困境、组织准备、制度限制和个人动机。本研究利用悖论理论作为框架，加深对医疗保健中与人工智能相关的感知障碍和潜在解决方案之间的复杂性和相互联系的理解，作为对文献的贡献。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Transforming towards AI-augmented Healthcare: Experiences of physicians in Sweden

Recent advancements in connectivity and automation driven by artificial intelligence (AI) is leading to transformative changes in the healthcare sector. This study investigates physicians' experience of AI-based technologies in healthcare. To achieve this objective, we gathered responses through open-ended essays from 326 physicians working in Swedish healthcare. These respondents have experience in using AI technologies for distinct tasks, which include prediction, diagnosis, medical image analysis, text generation, analysis, chatbots, wearable devices, telemedicine and robot assistance. The data was analyzed by thematic coding. The findings show that the physicians’ perception towards use of AI in healthcare is influenced by drivers and barriers that are present at macro, organizational, system and personal level. The identified drivers include work task changes, functional aspects, organizational aspects, system characteristics and personal motivators. The barriers include legal and ethical dilemma, organizational readiness, system limitations and personal demotivators. This study leverages paradox theory as a framework to deepen the understanding of the complexities and interconnections between perceived barriers and potential solutions related to AI in healthcare as a contribution to the literature.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Technovation 管理科学-工程：工业

CiteScore

15.10

自引率

11.20%

发文量

208

审稿时长

91 days

期刊介绍： The interdisciplinary journal Technovation covers various aspects of technological innovation, exploring processes, products, and social impacts. It examines innovation in both process and product realms, including social innovations like regulatory frameworks and non-economic benefits. Topics range from emerging trends and capital for development to managing technology-intensive ventures and innovation in organizations of different sizes. It also discusses organizational structures, investment strategies for science and technology enterprises, and the roles of technological innovators. Additionally, it addresses technology transfer between developing countries and innovation across enterprise, political, and economic systems.