{"title":"主动行为物理治疗干预(ABPI)治疗慢性非特异性颈部疼痛的有效性:一项内部先导集群随机双盲临床试验","authors":"Taweewat Wiangkham , Sureeporn Uthaikhup , Alison Rushton","doi":"10.1016/j.msksp.2025.103389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Chronic non-specific neck pain (CNSNP) causes pain and disability, contributing to a serious public health problem. An active behavioural physiotherapy intervention (ABPI) may be an effective intervention to manage patients with CNSNP based on our previous trial data. To date, a CNSNP population has not been investigated with an ABPI.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To preliminarily evaluate the potential effectiveness and feasibility of the ABPI for the management of patients with CNSNP.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>An internal pilot cluster-randomised double-blind, parallel 2-arm (ABPI vs standard physiotherapy intervention: SPI) clinical trial across 4 Thai public hospitals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Forty participants (20 each arm) were recruited and face-to-face assessed at baseline and 3-month follow-up post baseline using the neck disability index (NDI), numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), cervical range of motion, fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire, central sensitisation inventory (CSI) and short form-36.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean (standard deviation) age of participants was 38.1 (7.8) years. The ABPI demonstrated significant within group improvement in all outcome measures and the NDI, NPRS and CSI illustrated significant improvement for the SPI (p ≤ 0.05). For the comparison between groups, all outcome measures were significantly better in the ABPI arm compared to the SPI (p ≤ 0.05), except the CSI. Finally, the number of fully recovered participants (considering the NDI ≤ 4/50) was greater for the ABPI (15/20 participants, 75 %) than the SPI (7/20 participants, 35 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These promising findings from an internal pilot study support continued data collection to conduct the definitive phase III trial (n = 120) to evaluate the effectiveness of the ABPI for the CNSNP management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56036,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 103389"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of an active behavioural physiotherapy intervention (ABPI) for chronic non-specific neck pain: an internal pilot cluster-randomised double-blind clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"Taweewat Wiangkham , Sureeporn Uthaikhup , Alison Rushton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.msksp.2025.103389\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Chronic non-specific neck pain (CNSNP) causes pain and disability, contributing to a serious public health problem. An active behavioural physiotherapy intervention (ABPI) may be an effective intervention to manage patients with CNSNP based on our previous trial data. To date, a CNSNP population has not been investigated with an ABPI.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To preliminarily evaluate the potential effectiveness and feasibility of the ABPI for the management of patients with CNSNP.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>An internal pilot cluster-randomised double-blind, parallel 2-arm (ABPI vs standard physiotherapy intervention: SPI) clinical trial across 4 Thai public hospitals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Forty participants (20 each arm) were recruited and face-to-face assessed at baseline and 3-month follow-up post baseline using the neck disability index (NDI), numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), cervical range of motion, fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire, central sensitisation inventory (CSI) and short form-36.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean (standard deviation) age of participants was 38.1 (7.8) years. The ABPI demonstrated significant within group improvement in all outcome measures and the NDI, NPRS and CSI illustrated significant improvement for the SPI (p ≤ 0.05). For the comparison between groups, all outcome measures were significantly better in the ABPI arm compared to the SPI (p ≤ 0.05), except the CSI. Finally, the number of fully recovered participants (considering the NDI ≤ 4/50) was greater for the ABPI (15/20 participants, 75 %) than the SPI (7/20 participants, 35 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These promising findings from an internal pilot study support continued data collection to conduct the definitive phase III trial (n = 120) to evaluate the effectiveness of the ABPI for the CNSNP management.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice\",\"volume\":\"79 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103389\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468781225001377\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468781225001377","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effectiveness of an active behavioural physiotherapy intervention (ABPI) for chronic non-specific neck pain: an internal pilot cluster-randomised double-blind clinical trial
Background
Chronic non-specific neck pain (CNSNP) causes pain and disability, contributing to a serious public health problem. An active behavioural physiotherapy intervention (ABPI) may be an effective intervention to manage patients with CNSNP based on our previous trial data. To date, a CNSNP population has not been investigated with an ABPI.
Objectives
To preliminarily evaluate the potential effectiveness and feasibility of the ABPI for the management of patients with CNSNP.
Design
An internal pilot cluster-randomised double-blind, parallel 2-arm (ABPI vs standard physiotherapy intervention: SPI) clinical trial across 4 Thai public hospitals.
Methods
Forty participants (20 each arm) were recruited and face-to-face assessed at baseline and 3-month follow-up post baseline using the neck disability index (NDI), numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), cervical range of motion, fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire, central sensitisation inventory (CSI) and short form-36.
Results
The mean (standard deviation) age of participants was 38.1 (7.8) years. The ABPI demonstrated significant within group improvement in all outcome measures and the NDI, NPRS and CSI illustrated significant improvement for the SPI (p ≤ 0.05). For the comparison between groups, all outcome measures were significantly better in the ABPI arm compared to the SPI (p ≤ 0.05), except the CSI. Finally, the number of fully recovered participants (considering the NDI ≤ 4/50) was greater for the ABPI (15/20 participants, 75 %) than the SPI (7/20 participants, 35 %).
Conclusion
These promising findings from an internal pilot study support continued data collection to conduct the definitive phase III trial (n = 120) to evaluate the effectiveness of the ABPI for the CNSNP management.
期刊介绍:
Musculoskeletal Science & Practice, international journal of musculoskeletal physiotherapy, is a peer-reviewed international journal (previously Manual Therapy), publishing high quality original research, review and Masterclass articles that contribute to improving the clinical understanding of appropriate care processes for musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes articles that influence or add to the body of evidence on diagnostic and therapeutic processes, patient centered care, guidelines for musculoskeletal therapeutics and theoretical models that support developments in assessment, diagnosis, clinical reasoning and interventions.