穿透公私辩论:以资产为基础的方法来改变加拿大的医疗保健。

Danyaal Raza
{"title":"穿透公私辩论:以资产为基础的方法来改变加拿大的医疗保健。","authors":"Danyaal Raza","doi":"10.12927/hcpap.2025.27644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Canadian healthcare faces a myriad of challenges. Debates focused on reform often occur within the \"public vs. private\" paradigm, despite a body of evidence that has largely resolved the issue. Thus, the debate is not one of evidence; it is political. Piercing this debate can occur through a return to values, operationalizing them via design and adopting an assets-based approach. Challenges to reform cannot be ignored, including recognizing material realities. No matter what form changes to the healthcare system take, considerable social and political capital will be required for reform.</p>","PeriodicalId":101342,"journal":{"name":"HealthcarePapers","volume":"23 1","pages":"36-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Piercing the Public-Private Debate: An Asset-Based Approach to Transforming Canadian Healthcare.\",\"authors\":\"Danyaal Raza\",\"doi\":\"10.12927/hcpap.2025.27644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Canadian healthcare faces a myriad of challenges. Debates focused on reform often occur within the \\\"public vs. private\\\" paradigm, despite a body of evidence that has largely resolved the issue. Thus, the debate is not one of evidence; it is political. Piercing this debate can occur through a return to values, operationalizing them via design and adopting an assets-based approach. Challenges to reform cannot be ignored, including recognizing material realities. No matter what form changes to the healthcare system take, considerable social and political capital will be required for reform.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HealthcarePapers\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"36-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HealthcarePapers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpap.2025.27644\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HealthcarePapers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpap.2025.27644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

加拿大的医疗保健面临着无数挑战。尽管有大量证据已经在很大程度上解决了这个问题,但围绕改革的辩论往往发生在“公共与私人”的范式中。因此,辩论不是证据之一;这是政治问题。通过回归价值观,通过设计和采用基于资产的方法来实施这些价值观,可以解决这个问题。改革面临的挑战不容忽视,包括承认物质现实。无论对医疗体系采取何种形式的改革,改革都需要大量的社会和政治资本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Piercing the Public-Private Debate: An Asset-Based Approach to Transforming Canadian Healthcare.

Canadian healthcare faces a myriad of challenges. Debates focused on reform often occur within the "public vs. private" paradigm, despite a body of evidence that has largely resolved the issue. Thus, the debate is not one of evidence; it is political. Piercing this debate can occur through a return to values, operationalizing them via design and adopting an assets-based approach. Challenges to reform cannot be ignored, including recognizing material realities. No matter what form changes to the healthcare system take, considerable social and political capital will be required for reform.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信