加拿大可以找到第三条路,但私人保险不是灵丹妙药。

Zeynep Or
{"title":"加拿大可以找到第三条路,但私人保险不是灵丹妙药。","authors":"Zeynep Or","doi":"10.12927/hcpap.2025.27646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Canada's public healthcare system grapples with persistent challenges, including long waiting times and limited coverage for essential services. Fierlbeck and Berman propose a \"third way\" for Canadian healthcare, which involves a greater role for private service provision and private insurance, alongside improved price controls and efficiency measures. While they provide many sensible policy ideas, several critical issues require clarification, particularly the definition of private insurance, the scope of services it would cover and the potential financial impact on low-income populations. Rather than leaning heavily on private insurance and market-based solutions, expanding the public benefits package and reinforcing regulatory frameworks for integrating private capacity would be more equitable and sustainable paths forward.</p>","PeriodicalId":101342,"journal":{"name":"HealthcarePapers","volume":"23 1","pages":"26-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Canada Can Find a Third Way, but Private Insurance Is Not a Silver Bullet.\",\"authors\":\"Zeynep Or\",\"doi\":\"10.12927/hcpap.2025.27646\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Canada's public healthcare system grapples with persistent challenges, including long waiting times and limited coverage for essential services. Fierlbeck and Berman propose a \\\"third way\\\" for Canadian healthcare, which involves a greater role for private service provision and private insurance, alongside improved price controls and efficiency measures. While they provide many sensible policy ideas, several critical issues require clarification, particularly the definition of private insurance, the scope of services it would cover and the potential financial impact on low-income populations. Rather than leaning heavily on private insurance and market-based solutions, expanding the public benefits package and reinforcing regulatory frameworks for integrating private capacity would be more equitable and sustainable paths forward.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HealthcarePapers\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"26-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HealthcarePapers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpap.2025.27646\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HealthcarePapers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpap.2025.27646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

加拿大的公共医疗保健系统面临着持续的挑战,包括等待时间长和基本服务的覆盖范围有限。菲尔贝克和伯曼提出了加拿大医疗保健的“第三条道路”,其中包括私人服务提供和私人保险的更大作用,以及改进的价格控制和效率措施。虽然它们提供了许多明智的政策想法,但有几个关键问题需要澄清,特别是私人保险的定义、它将涵盖的服务范围以及对低收入人口的潜在财政影响。与其严重依赖私营保险和基于市场的解决方案,扩大公共福利计划和加强整合私营能力的监管框架将是更加公平和可持续的前进道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Canada Can Find a Third Way, but Private Insurance Is Not a Silver Bullet.

Canada's public healthcare system grapples with persistent challenges, including long waiting times and limited coverage for essential services. Fierlbeck and Berman propose a "third way" for Canadian healthcare, which involves a greater role for private service provision and private insurance, alongside improved price controls and efficiency measures. While they provide many sensible policy ideas, several critical issues require clarification, particularly the definition of private insurance, the scope of services it would cover and the potential financial impact on low-income populations. Rather than leaning heavily on private insurance and market-based solutions, expanding the public benefits package and reinforcing regulatory frameworks for integrating private capacity would be more equitable and sustainable paths forward.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信