{"title":"髌股疼痛综合征患者股内侧肌和股内侧肌开放和封闭运动链训练的比较:一项随机、单盲、前瞻性研究。","authors":"Burcu Ayık, Onur Armağan, Fulya Bakılan","doi":"10.5606/tftrd.2025.15971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the effect of open and closed kinetic chain exercises on pain, thickness of vastus medialis (VM) and vastus medialis oblique (VMO) muscle, and VMO architecture.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The randomized single-blind prospective was conducted between January 2022 and September 2023. Thirty patients (11 males, 19 females; mean age: 37.5±8.8 years; range, 18 to 50 years) with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) were randomized into two groups. Fifteen patients in the first group (23 knees) received open kinetic chain exercises, and 15 patients in the second group (22 knees) received closed kinetic chain exercises (CKCE) as a six-week home exercise program. The following variables were measured before and after the exercise program: Visual Analog Scale , Q angle, and ultrasonographic measurements. In ultrasonographic measurements, the thickness of the VM and VMO muscles and the VMO fiber angle was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed statistically highly significant improvement in all evaluation parameters in inter- and intragroup comparisons (p<0.001). Before treatment, there was no statistical difference in Visual Analog Scale scores between the two groups. However, a significant decrease was observed in favor of the CKCE group after treatment (p=0.037). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of VMO, VM muscle thickness, and fiber angle changes (p=0.26, p=0.28, and p=0.28, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The thickness of the VM and VMO muscles, the angle of the VMO fibers, and the pain scores improved both exercise groups in patients with PFPS. However, CKCE proved to be superior for pain reduction. Both open and closed kinetic chain exercises can be beneficial for PFPS management, with CKCE potentially being more appropriate for patients with prominent pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":56043,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"71 2","pages":"216-225"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12305690/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of open and closed kinetic chain exercises on vastus medialis and vastus medialis oblique in patellofemoral pain syndrome: A randomized, single-blinded, prospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Burcu Ayık, Onur Armağan, Fulya Bakılan\",\"doi\":\"10.5606/tftrd.2025.15971\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the effect of open and closed kinetic chain exercises on pain, thickness of vastus medialis (VM) and vastus medialis oblique (VMO) muscle, and VMO architecture.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The randomized single-blind prospective was conducted between January 2022 and September 2023. Thirty patients (11 males, 19 females; mean age: 37.5±8.8 years; range, 18 to 50 years) with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) were randomized into two groups. Fifteen patients in the first group (23 knees) received open kinetic chain exercises, and 15 patients in the second group (22 knees) received closed kinetic chain exercises (CKCE) as a six-week home exercise program. The following variables were measured before and after the exercise program: Visual Analog Scale , Q angle, and ultrasonographic measurements. In ultrasonographic measurements, the thickness of the VM and VMO muscles and the VMO fiber angle was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed statistically highly significant improvement in all evaluation parameters in inter- and intragroup comparisons (p<0.001). Before treatment, there was no statistical difference in Visual Analog Scale scores between the two groups. However, a significant decrease was observed in favor of the CKCE group after treatment (p=0.037). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of VMO, VM muscle thickness, and fiber angle changes (p=0.26, p=0.28, and p=0.28, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The thickness of the VM and VMO muscles, the angle of the VMO fibers, and the pain scores improved both exercise groups in patients with PFPS. However, CKCE proved to be superior for pain reduction. Both open and closed kinetic chain exercises can be beneficial for PFPS management, with CKCE potentially being more appropriate for patients with prominent pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"71 2\",\"pages\":\"216-225\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12305690/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2025.15971\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2025.15971","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of open and closed kinetic chain exercises on vastus medialis and vastus medialis oblique in patellofemoral pain syndrome: A randomized, single-blinded, prospective study.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of open and closed kinetic chain exercises on pain, thickness of vastus medialis (VM) and vastus medialis oblique (VMO) muscle, and VMO architecture.
Patients and methods: The randomized single-blind prospective was conducted between January 2022 and September 2023. Thirty patients (11 males, 19 females; mean age: 37.5±8.8 years; range, 18 to 50 years) with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) were randomized into two groups. Fifteen patients in the first group (23 knees) received open kinetic chain exercises, and 15 patients in the second group (22 knees) received closed kinetic chain exercises (CKCE) as a six-week home exercise program. The following variables were measured before and after the exercise program: Visual Analog Scale , Q angle, and ultrasonographic measurements. In ultrasonographic measurements, the thickness of the VM and VMO muscles and the VMO fiber angle was evaluated.
Results: Both groups showed statistically highly significant improvement in all evaluation parameters in inter- and intragroup comparisons (p<0.001). Before treatment, there was no statistical difference in Visual Analog Scale scores between the two groups. However, a significant decrease was observed in favor of the CKCE group after treatment (p=0.037). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of VMO, VM muscle thickness, and fiber angle changes (p=0.26, p=0.28, and p=0.28, respectively).
Conclusion: The thickness of the VM and VMO muscles, the angle of the VMO fibers, and the pain scores improved both exercise groups in patients with PFPS. However, CKCE proved to be superior for pain reduction. Both open and closed kinetic chain exercises can be beneficial for PFPS management, with CKCE potentially being more appropriate for patients with prominent pain.
期刊介绍:
The Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Formerly published as Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi) is the official journal of the Turkish Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The journal is an international open-access, double-blind peer-reviewed periodical journal bringing the latest developments in all aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation, and related fields. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, editorials, case reports (limited), letters to the editors. The target readership includes academic members, specialists, residents working in the fields of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The language of the journal is English and it is published quarterly (in March, June, September, and December).