髌股疼痛综合征患者股内侧肌和股内侧肌开放和封闭运动链训练的比较:一项随机、单盲、前瞻性研究。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Burcu Ayık, Onur Armağan, Fulya Bakılan
{"title":"髌股疼痛综合征患者股内侧肌和股内侧肌开放和封闭运动链训练的比较:一项随机、单盲、前瞻性研究。","authors":"Burcu Ayık, Onur Armağan, Fulya Bakılan","doi":"10.5606/tftrd.2025.15971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the effect of open and closed kinetic chain exercises on pain, thickness of vastus medialis (VM) and vastus medialis oblique (VMO) muscle, and VMO architecture.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The randomized single-blind prospective was conducted between January 2022 and September 2023. Thirty patients (11 males, 19 females; mean age: 37.5±8.8 years; range, 18 to 50 years) with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) were randomized into two groups. Fifteen patients in the first group (23 knees) received open kinetic chain exercises, and 15 patients in the second group (22 knees) received closed kinetic chain exercises (CKCE) as a six-week home exercise program. The following variables were measured before and after the exercise program: Visual Analog Scale , Q angle, and ultrasonographic measurements. In ultrasonographic measurements, the thickness of the VM and VMO muscles and the VMO fiber angle was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed statistically highly significant improvement in all evaluation parameters in inter- and intragroup comparisons (p<0.001). Before treatment, there was no statistical difference in Visual Analog Scale scores between the two groups. However, a significant decrease was observed in favor of the CKCE group after treatment (p=0.037). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of VMO, VM muscle thickness, and fiber angle changes (p=0.26, p=0.28, and p=0.28, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The thickness of the VM and VMO muscles, the angle of the VMO fibers, and the pain scores improved both exercise groups in patients with PFPS. However, CKCE proved to be superior for pain reduction. Both open and closed kinetic chain exercises can be beneficial for PFPS management, with CKCE potentially being more appropriate for patients with prominent pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":56043,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"71 2","pages":"216-225"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12305690/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of open and closed kinetic chain exercises on vastus medialis and vastus medialis oblique in patellofemoral pain syndrome: A randomized, single-blinded, prospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Burcu Ayık, Onur Armağan, Fulya Bakılan\",\"doi\":\"10.5606/tftrd.2025.15971\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the effect of open and closed kinetic chain exercises on pain, thickness of vastus medialis (VM) and vastus medialis oblique (VMO) muscle, and VMO architecture.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The randomized single-blind prospective was conducted between January 2022 and September 2023. Thirty patients (11 males, 19 females; mean age: 37.5±8.8 years; range, 18 to 50 years) with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) were randomized into two groups. Fifteen patients in the first group (23 knees) received open kinetic chain exercises, and 15 patients in the second group (22 knees) received closed kinetic chain exercises (CKCE) as a six-week home exercise program. The following variables were measured before and after the exercise program: Visual Analog Scale , Q angle, and ultrasonographic measurements. In ultrasonographic measurements, the thickness of the VM and VMO muscles and the VMO fiber angle was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed statistically highly significant improvement in all evaluation parameters in inter- and intragroup comparisons (p<0.001). Before treatment, there was no statistical difference in Visual Analog Scale scores between the two groups. However, a significant decrease was observed in favor of the CKCE group after treatment (p=0.037). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of VMO, VM muscle thickness, and fiber angle changes (p=0.26, p=0.28, and p=0.28, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The thickness of the VM and VMO muscles, the angle of the VMO fibers, and the pain scores improved both exercise groups in patients with PFPS. However, CKCE proved to be superior for pain reduction. Both open and closed kinetic chain exercises can be beneficial for PFPS management, with CKCE potentially being more appropriate for patients with prominent pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"71 2\",\"pages\":\"216-225\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12305690/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2025.15971\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2025.15971","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是比较开放和封闭动力链运动对疼痛、股内侧肌(VM)和股内侧斜肌(VMO)肌肉厚度和VMO结构的影响。患者和方法:随机单盲前瞻性研究于2022年1月至2023年9月进行。30例患者(男11例,女19例;平均年龄:37.5±8.8岁;年龄18 ~ 50岁的髌骨股痛综合征(PFPS)患者随机分为两组。第一组15例患者(23个膝关节)接受开放式动力链锻炼,第二组15例患者(22个膝关节)接受封闭式动力链锻炼(CKCE),作为为期6周的家庭锻炼计划。在运动计划前后测量以下变量:视觉模拟量表,Q角和超声测量。在超声测量中,评估VM和VMO肌肉的厚度和VMO纤维的角度。结果:两组间和组内比较,两组的各项评价指标均有显著改善(p)。结论:运动组与运动组PFPS患者VM和VMO肌肉厚度、VMO纤维角度、疼痛评分均有显著改善。然而,CKCE在减轻疼痛方面被证明是优越的。开放和封闭的运动链练习对PFPS的治疗都是有益的,CKCE可能更适合有明显疼痛的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of open and closed kinetic chain exercises on vastus medialis and vastus medialis oblique in patellofemoral pain syndrome: A randomized, single-blinded, prospective study.

Comparison of open and closed kinetic chain exercises on vastus medialis and vastus medialis oblique in patellofemoral pain syndrome: A randomized, single-blinded, prospective study.

Comparison of open and closed kinetic chain exercises on vastus medialis and vastus medialis oblique in patellofemoral pain syndrome: A randomized, single-blinded, prospective study.

Comparison of open and closed kinetic chain exercises on vastus medialis and vastus medialis oblique in patellofemoral pain syndrome: A randomized, single-blinded, prospective study.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of open and closed kinetic chain exercises on pain, thickness of vastus medialis (VM) and vastus medialis oblique (VMO) muscle, and VMO architecture.

Patients and methods: The randomized single-blind prospective was conducted between January 2022 and September 2023. Thirty patients (11 males, 19 females; mean age: 37.5±8.8 years; range, 18 to 50 years) with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) were randomized into two groups. Fifteen patients in the first group (23 knees) received open kinetic chain exercises, and 15 patients in the second group (22 knees) received closed kinetic chain exercises (CKCE) as a six-week home exercise program. The following variables were measured before and after the exercise program: Visual Analog Scale , Q angle, and ultrasonographic measurements. In ultrasonographic measurements, the thickness of the VM and VMO muscles and the VMO fiber angle was evaluated.

Results: Both groups showed statistically highly significant improvement in all evaluation parameters in inter- and intragroup comparisons (p<0.001). Before treatment, there was no statistical difference in Visual Analog Scale scores between the two groups. However, a significant decrease was observed in favor of the CKCE group after treatment (p=0.037). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of VMO, VM muscle thickness, and fiber angle changes (p=0.26, p=0.28, and p=0.28, respectively).

Conclusion: The thickness of the VM and VMO muscles, the angle of the VMO fibers, and the pain scores improved both exercise groups in patients with PFPS. However, CKCE proved to be superior for pain reduction. Both open and closed kinetic chain exercises can be beneficial for PFPS management, with CKCE potentially being more appropriate for patients with prominent pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Formerly published as Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi) is the official journal of the Turkish Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The journal is an international open-access, double-blind peer-reviewed periodical journal bringing the latest developments in all aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation, and related fields. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, editorials, case reports (limited), letters to the editors. The target readership includes academic members, specialists, residents working in the fields of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The language of the journal is English and it is published quarterly (in March, June, September, and December).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信