利用可互操作的电子健康记录(EHR)数据进行临床研究中的分布式分析:HELP研究的技术实施报告。

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Julia Palm, Kutaiba Saleh, André Scherag, Danny Ammon
{"title":"利用可互操作的电子健康记录(EHR)数据进行临床研究中的分布式分析:HELP研究的技术实施报告。","authors":"Julia Palm, Kutaiba Saleh, André Scherag, Danny Ammon","doi":"10.2196/68171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Medical Informatics Initiative (MII) Germany established 38 data integration centers (DIC) in university hospitals to improve health care and biomedical research through the use of electronic health record (EHR) data. To showcase the value of these DIC, the HELP (Hospital-wide Electronic Medical Record Evaluated Computerized Decision Support System to Improve Outcomes of Patients with Staphylococcal Bloodstream Infection) study was initiated as a use case. This study is a clinical trial designed to assess the impact of a computerized decision support system for managing staphylococcal bacteremia.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this paper, we present the lessons learned during the use case from a technical perspective. This paper outlines the challenges encountered and solutions developed during our initial implementation of this infrastructure, providing insights applicable to other research platforms using EHR data. These insights are organized into 3 key areas: study-specific data definition and modeling, interoperable data integration and transformation, and distributed data extraction and analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An interdisciplinary team of clinicians, computer scientists, and statisticians created a catalog of items to identify data elements necessary for the study's evaluation and developed a domain-specific information model. DIC developed extract-transform-load pipelines to collect the disparate, site-specific EHR data and to transform it into a common data format. Health Level Seven International (HL7) Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) and the MII's core dataset profiles were adopted for consistent data representation across sites. Additionally, data not present in EHRs was gathered using structured electronic case report forms. Analysis scripts were then distributed to the sites to preprocess the data locally, followed by a central analysis of the preprocessed data to generate the final overall results.</p><p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Our analysis revealed significant heterogeneity in data quality and implementation of interoperability standards, requiring substantial harmonization efforts. The development of analysis scripts and data extraction processes demanded multiple iterative cycles and close collaboration with local data experts. Despite these challenges, the successful implementation demonstrated the feasibility of distributed EHR analyses while highlighting the importance of thorough data quality assessment, realistic timeline planning, and multidisciplinary expertise.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The HELP study highlights challenges and opportunities in leveraging EHR data for clinical research, particularly in the absence of mandatory data standards and resource-intensive data harmonization efforts. Despite limitations in data availability and quality, progress in digitization and interoperability frameworks offers hope for future improvements. Lessons learned from this study can inform the development of standardized methodologies and infrastructures for sustainable EHR data integration in research.</p>","PeriodicalId":56334,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Informatics","volume":"13 ","pages":"e68171"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12310147/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leveraging Interoperable Electronic Health Record (EHR) Data for Distributed Analyses in Clinical Research: Technical Implementation Report of the HELP Study.\",\"authors\":\"Julia Palm, Kutaiba Saleh, André Scherag, Danny Ammon\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/68171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Medical Informatics Initiative (MII) Germany established 38 data integration centers (DIC) in university hospitals to improve health care and biomedical research through the use of electronic health record (EHR) data. To showcase the value of these DIC, the HELP (Hospital-wide Electronic Medical Record Evaluated Computerized Decision Support System to Improve Outcomes of Patients with Staphylococcal Bloodstream Infection) study was initiated as a use case. This study is a clinical trial designed to assess the impact of a computerized decision support system for managing staphylococcal bacteremia.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this paper, we present the lessons learned during the use case from a technical perspective. This paper outlines the challenges encountered and solutions developed during our initial implementation of this infrastructure, providing insights applicable to other research platforms using EHR data. These insights are organized into 3 key areas: study-specific data definition and modeling, interoperable data integration and transformation, and distributed data extraction and analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An interdisciplinary team of clinicians, computer scientists, and statisticians created a catalog of items to identify data elements necessary for the study's evaluation and developed a domain-specific information model. DIC developed extract-transform-load pipelines to collect the disparate, site-specific EHR data and to transform it into a common data format. Health Level Seven International (HL7) Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) and the MII's core dataset profiles were adopted for consistent data representation across sites. Additionally, data not present in EHRs was gathered using structured electronic case report forms. Analysis scripts were then distributed to the sites to preprocess the data locally, followed by a central analysis of the preprocessed data to generate the final overall results.</p><p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Our analysis revealed significant heterogeneity in data quality and implementation of interoperability standards, requiring substantial harmonization efforts. The development of analysis scripts and data extraction processes demanded multiple iterative cycles and close collaboration with local data experts. Despite these challenges, the successful implementation demonstrated the feasibility of distributed EHR analyses while highlighting the importance of thorough data quality assessment, realistic timeline planning, and multidisciplinary expertise.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The HELP study highlights challenges and opportunities in leveraging EHR data for clinical research, particularly in the absence of mandatory data standards and resource-intensive data harmonization efforts. Despite limitations in data availability and quality, progress in digitization and interoperability frameworks offers hope for future improvements. Lessons learned from this study can inform the development of standardized methodologies and infrastructures for sustainable EHR data integration in research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Medical Informatics\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"e68171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12310147/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Medical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/68171\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/68171","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:德国医学信息学倡议(MII)在大学医院建立了38个数据集成中心(DIC),通过使用电子健康记录(EHR)数据来改善医疗保健和生物医学研究。为了展示这些DIC的价值,HELP(全院电子病历评估计算机化决策支持系统以改善葡萄球菌血流感染患者的预后)研究作为一个用例被启动。本研究是一项临床试验,旨在评估计算机决策支持系统对管理葡萄球菌菌血症的影响。目的:在本文中,我们从技术角度展示了在用例过程中获得的经验教训。本文概述了在我们最初实施该基础设施期间遇到的挑战和开发的解决方案,并提供了适用于使用EHR数据的其他研究平台的见解。这些见解被组织成3个关键领域:特定研究的数据定义和建模,可互操作的数据集成和转换,以及分布式数据提取和分析。方法:一个由临床医生、计算机科学家和统计学家组成的跨学科团队创建了一个项目目录,以确定研究评估所需的数据元素,并开发了一个特定领域的信息模型。DIC开发了提取-转换-加载管道来收集不同的、特定于站点的EHR数据,并将其转换为通用的数据格式。采用了Health Level Seven International (HL7)快速医疗保健互操作性资源(FHIR)和MII的核心数据集配置文件来实现跨站点的一致数据表示。此外,使用结构化的电子病例报告表格收集电子病历中没有的数据。然后将分析脚本分发到站点,以便在本地对数据进行预处理,然后对预处理数据进行集中分析,以生成最终的总体结果。未标记:我们的分析揭示了数据质量和互操作性标准实现的显著差异,需要大量的协调工作。分析脚本和数据提取过程的开发需要多个迭代周期并与当地数据专家密切合作。尽管存在这些挑战,但成功的实施证明了分布式EHR分析的可行性,同时强调了彻底的数据质量评估、现实的时间表规划和多学科专业知识的重要性。结论:HELP研究强调了利用电子病历数据进行临床研究的挑战和机遇,特别是在缺乏强制性数据标准和资源密集型数据协调工作的情况下。尽管数据的可用性和质量存在局限性,但数字化和互操作性框架的进展为未来的改进提供了希望。从这项研究中吸取的经验教训可以为标准化方法和基础设施的发展提供信息,以便在研究中实现可持续的电子病历数据整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Leveraging Interoperable Electronic Health Record (EHR) Data for Distributed Analyses in Clinical Research: Technical Implementation Report of the HELP Study.

Leveraging Interoperable Electronic Health Record (EHR) Data for Distributed Analyses in Clinical Research: Technical Implementation Report of the HELP Study.

Leveraging Interoperable Electronic Health Record (EHR) Data for Distributed Analyses in Clinical Research: Technical Implementation Report of the HELP Study.

Leveraging Interoperable Electronic Health Record (EHR) Data for Distributed Analyses in Clinical Research: Technical Implementation Report of the HELP Study.

Background: The Medical Informatics Initiative (MII) Germany established 38 data integration centers (DIC) in university hospitals to improve health care and biomedical research through the use of electronic health record (EHR) data. To showcase the value of these DIC, the HELP (Hospital-wide Electronic Medical Record Evaluated Computerized Decision Support System to Improve Outcomes of Patients with Staphylococcal Bloodstream Infection) study was initiated as a use case. This study is a clinical trial designed to assess the impact of a computerized decision support system for managing staphylococcal bacteremia.

Objective: In this paper, we present the lessons learned during the use case from a technical perspective. This paper outlines the challenges encountered and solutions developed during our initial implementation of this infrastructure, providing insights applicable to other research platforms using EHR data. These insights are organized into 3 key areas: study-specific data definition and modeling, interoperable data integration and transformation, and distributed data extraction and analysis.

Methods: An interdisciplinary team of clinicians, computer scientists, and statisticians created a catalog of items to identify data elements necessary for the study's evaluation and developed a domain-specific information model. DIC developed extract-transform-load pipelines to collect the disparate, site-specific EHR data and to transform it into a common data format. Health Level Seven International (HL7) Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) and the MII's core dataset profiles were adopted for consistent data representation across sites. Additionally, data not present in EHRs was gathered using structured electronic case report forms. Analysis scripts were then distributed to the sites to preprocess the data locally, followed by a central analysis of the preprocessed data to generate the final overall results.

Unlabelled: Our analysis revealed significant heterogeneity in data quality and implementation of interoperability standards, requiring substantial harmonization efforts. The development of analysis scripts and data extraction processes demanded multiple iterative cycles and close collaboration with local data experts. Despite these challenges, the successful implementation demonstrated the feasibility of distributed EHR analyses while highlighting the importance of thorough data quality assessment, realistic timeline planning, and multidisciplinary expertise.

Conclusions: The HELP study highlights challenges and opportunities in leveraging EHR data for clinical research, particularly in the absence of mandatory data standards and resource-intensive data harmonization efforts. Despite limitations in data availability and quality, progress in digitization and interoperability frameworks offers hope for future improvements. Lessons learned from this study can inform the development of standardized methodologies and infrastructures for sustainable EHR data integration in research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Medical Informatics
JMIR Medical Informatics Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
173
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR Medical Informatics (JMI, ISSN 2291-9694) is a top-rated, tier A journal which focuses on clinical informatics, big data in health and health care, decision support for health professionals, electronic health records, ehealth infrastructures and implementation. It has a focus on applied, translational research, with a broad readership including clinicians, CIOs, engineers, industry and health informatics professionals. Published by JMIR Publications, publisher of the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR), the leading eHealth/mHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175), JMIR Med Inform has a slightly different scope (emphasizing more on applications for clinicians and health professionals rather than consumers/citizens, which is the focus of JMIR), publishes even faster, and also allows papers which are more technical or more formative than what would be published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信