资本形式、社会变革和过去的分量:1910-2015年瑞士权力领域的有效动因。

IF 2.9 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY
Thierry Rossier, Jacob Aagaard Lunding
{"title":"资本形式、社会变革和过去的分量:1910-2015年瑞士权力领域的有效动因。","authors":"Thierry Rossier, Jacob Aagaard Lunding","doi":"10.1177/00380385251322061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this article we delve into the elites' evolving forms of power to study the relationship between social change and capital accumulation. Drawing on Pierre Bourdieu's notion of the field of power and relying on the identification of the field's effective agents in Switzerland, we investigate the changing relations among the most important forms of capital. We use prosopographical data spanning six historical periods from 1910 to 2015 and thanks to multiple correspondence analysis we uncover the changing structure of the field of power. We show the dominance of economic and organisational network powers throughout history. While both forms of power opposed before the Second World War, they could be accumulated together between the 1950s and the 1980s but opposed again in the recent period. The article contributes to 'big picture' sociology, offering historical accounts of broad social trends and provides evidence of a recent return to past inequality logics.</p>","PeriodicalId":48356,"journal":{"name":"Sociology-The Journal of the British Sociological Association","volume":"59 4","pages":"761-781"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12306905/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forms of Capital, Social Change and the Weight of the Past: The Effective Agents of the Swiss Field of Power 1910-2015.\",\"authors\":\"Thierry Rossier, Jacob Aagaard Lunding\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00380385251322061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this article we delve into the elites' evolving forms of power to study the relationship between social change and capital accumulation. Drawing on Pierre Bourdieu's notion of the field of power and relying on the identification of the field's effective agents in Switzerland, we investigate the changing relations among the most important forms of capital. We use prosopographical data spanning six historical periods from 1910 to 2015 and thanks to multiple correspondence analysis we uncover the changing structure of the field of power. We show the dominance of economic and organisational network powers throughout history. While both forms of power opposed before the Second World War, they could be accumulated together between the 1950s and the 1980s but opposed again in the recent period. The article contributes to 'big picture' sociology, offering historical accounts of broad social trends and provides evidence of a recent return to past inequality logics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociology-The Journal of the British Sociological Association\",\"volume\":\"59 4\",\"pages\":\"761-781\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12306905/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociology-The Journal of the British Sociological Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385251322061\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology-The Journal of the British Sociological Association","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385251322061","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们将深入探讨精英权力形式的演变,以研究社会变革与资本积累之间的关系。借鉴皮埃尔·布迪厄(Pierre Bourdieu)关于权力场域的概念,并依靠对瑞士权力场域有效代理人的识别,我们研究了最重要的资本形式之间不断变化的关系。我们使用了从1910年到2015年的六个历史时期的人物学数据,通过多次对应分析,我们揭示了权力领域不断变化的结构。我们展示了历史上经济和组织网络力量的主导地位。虽然这两种形式的权力在第二次世界大战之前是对立的,但它们可能在20世纪50年代至80年代之间积聚在一起,但在最近一段时期再次遭到反对。这篇文章为“大图景”社会学做出了贡献,提供了广泛的社会趋势的历史描述,并提供了最近回归过去不平等逻辑的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Forms of Capital, Social Change and the Weight of the Past: The Effective Agents of the Swiss Field of Power 1910-2015.

Forms of Capital, Social Change and the Weight of the Past: The Effective Agents of the Swiss Field of Power 1910-2015.

Forms of Capital, Social Change and the Weight of the Past: The Effective Agents of the Swiss Field of Power 1910-2015.

Forms of Capital, Social Change and the Weight of the Past: The Effective Agents of the Swiss Field of Power 1910-2015.

In this article we delve into the elites' evolving forms of power to study the relationship between social change and capital accumulation. Drawing on Pierre Bourdieu's notion of the field of power and relying on the identification of the field's effective agents in Switzerland, we investigate the changing relations among the most important forms of capital. We use prosopographical data spanning six historical periods from 1910 to 2015 and thanks to multiple correspondence analysis we uncover the changing structure of the field of power. We show the dominance of economic and organisational network powers throughout history. While both forms of power opposed before the Second World War, they could be accumulated together between the 1950s and the 1980s but opposed again in the recent period. The article contributes to 'big picture' sociology, offering historical accounts of broad social trends and provides evidence of a recent return to past inequality logics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.90%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: The objective of Sociology is to publish outstanding and original articles which advance the theoretical understanding of, and promote and report empirical research about the widest range of sociological topics. The journal encourages, and welcomes, submission of papers which report findings using both quantitative and qualitative research methods; articles challenging conventional concepts and proposing new conceptual approaches; and accounts of methodological innovation and the research process. Research Notes provide a means of briefly summarising results from recent or current studies or short discussions of methodological problems and solutions. Critical review essays and book reviews are seen as ways of promoting vigorous scholarly debate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信