工程安全护理旅程:设计患者安全护照。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Nicole E Werner, Maureen Smith, Rachel A Rutkowski, Hanna J Barton, Kathryn Wust, Peter Hoonakker, Barbara J King, Manish N Shah, Brian W Patterson, Michael S Pulia, Paula Vw Dail, Pascale Carayon
{"title":"工程安全护理旅程:设计患者安全护照。","authors":"Nicole E Werner, Maureen Smith, Rachel A Rutkowski, Hanna J Barton, Kathryn Wust, Peter Hoonakker, Barbara J King, Manish N Shah, Brian W Patterson, Michael S Pulia, Paula Vw Dail, Pascale Carayon","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to use a participatory Human Factors Engineering (HFE) approach to identify key design guidelines and design requirements of a patient safety passport (PSP) to improve patient safety at care transition points along the patient journey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a work system analysis and participatory design process to integrate the needs of multiple perspectives using cognitive interviews, contextual inquiry, team-based analysis, and codesign sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We conducted semistructured interviews (N=29) with clinicians. We also conducted 20 contextual inquiry observations of older adult patients in the emergency department (ED) followed by 20 interviews with the ED clinicians who cared for those patients. We mapped the care transition process that included transitioning to the ED, being seen in the ED, and transitioning from the ED to the next location. We identified 21 categories representing the interaction of work system barriers and facilitators to safe ED care transitions. We identified 5 design guidelines, which provide the overarching conceptual characteristics of a PSP, and 5 design requirements to guide PSP design.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our participatory HFE approach with a multidisciplinary design team identified key design guidelines and requirements for a PSP. Although this work was focused on the ED, a PSP is likely applicable to a range of care transition domains. Future work should seek to validate and refine PSP design requirements and guidelines across domains as part of a learning health system that can transform care transitions to be points of patient safety resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engineering Safe Care Journeys: Designing a Patient Safety Passport.\",\"authors\":\"Nicole E Werner, Maureen Smith, Rachel A Rutkowski, Hanna J Barton, Kathryn Wust, Peter Hoonakker, Barbara J King, Manish N Shah, Brian W Patterson, Michael S Pulia, Paula Vw Dail, Pascale Carayon\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to use a participatory Human Factors Engineering (HFE) approach to identify key design guidelines and design requirements of a patient safety passport (PSP) to improve patient safety at care transition points along the patient journey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a work system analysis and participatory design process to integrate the needs of multiple perspectives using cognitive interviews, contextual inquiry, team-based analysis, and codesign sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We conducted semistructured interviews (N=29) with clinicians. We also conducted 20 contextual inquiry observations of older adult patients in the emergency department (ED) followed by 20 interviews with the ED clinicians who cared for those patients. We mapped the care transition process that included transitioning to the ED, being seen in the ED, and transitioning from the ED to the next location. We identified 21 categories representing the interaction of work system barriers and facilitators to safe ED care transitions. We identified 5 design guidelines, which provide the overarching conceptual characteristics of a PSP, and 5 design requirements to guide PSP design.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our participatory HFE approach with a multidisciplinary design team identified key design guidelines and requirements for a PSP. Although this work was focused on the ED, a PSP is likely applicable to a range of care transition domains. Future work should seek to validate and refine PSP design requirements and guidelines across domains as part of a learning health system that can transform care transitions to be points of patient safety resilience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Patient Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Patient Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001397\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001397","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是使用参与式人为因素工程(HFE)方法来确定患者安全护照(PSP)的关键设计指南和设计要求,以提高患者旅程中护理过渡点的患者安全。方法:我们进行了工作系统分析和参与式设计过程,通过认知访谈、情境调查、基于团队的分析和共同设计会议来整合多个视角的需求。结果:我们对临床医生进行了半结构化访谈(N=29)。我们还对急诊科(ED)的老年患者进行了20次背景调查观察,随后对照顾这些患者的ED临床医生进行了20次访谈。我们绘制了护理过渡过程,包括过渡到急诊科,在急诊科就诊,从急诊科过渡到下一个地点。我们确定了21个类别,代表了工作系统障碍和促进安全急诊科护理过渡的相互作用。我们确定了5个设计准则,它们提供了PSP的总体概念特征,以及指导PSP设计的5个设计要求。结论:我们的参与式HFE方法与多学科设计团队确定了PSP的关键设计指南和要求。虽然这项工作主要集中在急诊科,但PSP可能适用于一系列护理过渡领域。未来的工作应寻求验证和完善跨领域的PSP设计要求和指南,作为学习型卫生系统的一部分,可以将护理过渡转变为患者安全弹性点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Engineering Safe Care Journeys: Designing a Patient Safety Passport.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to use a participatory Human Factors Engineering (HFE) approach to identify key design guidelines and design requirements of a patient safety passport (PSP) to improve patient safety at care transition points along the patient journey.

Methods: We conducted a work system analysis and participatory design process to integrate the needs of multiple perspectives using cognitive interviews, contextual inquiry, team-based analysis, and codesign sessions.

Results: We conducted semistructured interviews (N=29) with clinicians. We also conducted 20 contextual inquiry observations of older adult patients in the emergency department (ED) followed by 20 interviews with the ED clinicians who cared for those patients. We mapped the care transition process that included transitioning to the ED, being seen in the ED, and transitioning from the ED to the next location. We identified 21 categories representing the interaction of work system barriers and facilitators to safe ED care transitions. We identified 5 design guidelines, which provide the overarching conceptual characteristics of a PSP, and 5 design requirements to guide PSP design.

Conclusions: Our participatory HFE approach with a multidisciplinary design team identified key design guidelines and requirements for a PSP. Although this work was focused on the ED, a PSP is likely applicable to a range of care transition domains. Future work should seek to validate and refine PSP design requirements and guidelines across domains as part of a learning health system that can transform care transitions to be points of patient safety resilience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信