市民患者安全文化评估:一项调查研究。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Micaela La Regina, Chiara Parretti, Daniela Bernardini, Nuccia Oneto, Giulia Torricelli, Lorenzo Federici, Riccardo Tartaglia
{"title":"市民患者安全文化评估:一项调查研究。","authors":"Micaela La Regina, Chiara Parretti, Daniela Bernardini, Nuccia Oneto, Giulia Torricelli, Lorenzo Federici, Riccardo Tartaglia","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Public engagement in quality and safety improvement is crucial in health care. To have an effective participation, it appears essential to align knowledge, language, and values among users and workers. Present study is aimed to assess patient safety culture and knowledge among a representative sample of Italian citizens, with/without chronic medical conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A semistructured, self-administered questionnaire was distributed through email to a nationally representative population database (DOXA, Milan, Italy). The email response rate was 21% out of 5678 emails sent. The sample consisted of 1200 individuals, of whom 400 had severe chronic conditions requiring regular hospital visits (referred to as \"patients\") and 800 did not have such conditions (referred to as \"citizens\").Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were done, comparing subjects with/without chronic medical conditions across various demographic variables. Main investigation areas: fundamentals and best practice of patient safety, sources of information, attitudes towards telemedicine and clinical trials, participation to health care improvement and identification of relevant experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings revealed limited knowledge of patient safety fundamentals, clinical trials and telemedicine, and better knowledge of patient safety practices. No significant differences emerged between patients and citizens regarding the understanding of medical error (60.8% patients versus 64.1% citizens) and adverse event (17.8% patients versus 15.9% citizens). The only significant difference concerning good practices relates to the interference of food with therapy (82.3% patients versus 72.5% citizens). The patient safety responsibility is attributed mainly to physicians (68% patients versus 66% citizens), then to management (48% patients versus 49% citizens) and nurses (41% patients versus 42% citizens).No statistically significant differences were found between citizens with/without chronic diseases; being over 44 years and/or having high-level education were associated with better culture. Structured citizen engagement is not widespread in the country.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Effective strategies for cultivating health care quality and safety culture among citizens are needed, as well as enhancing and monitoring medical information, especially in view of telemedicine and artificial intelligence.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Patient Safety Culture Among Citizens: A Survey Study.\",\"authors\":\"Micaela La Regina, Chiara Parretti, Daniela Bernardini, Nuccia Oneto, Giulia Torricelli, Lorenzo Federici, Riccardo Tartaglia\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Public engagement in quality and safety improvement is crucial in health care. To have an effective participation, it appears essential to align knowledge, language, and values among users and workers. Present study is aimed to assess patient safety culture and knowledge among a representative sample of Italian citizens, with/without chronic medical conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A semistructured, self-administered questionnaire was distributed through email to a nationally representative population database (DOXA, Milan, Italy). The email response rate was 21% out of 5678 emails sent. The sample consisted of 1200 individuals, of whom 400 had severe chronic conditions requiring regular hospital visits (referred to as \\\"patients\\\") and 800 did not have such conditions (referred to as \\\"citizens\\\").Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were done, comparing subjects with/without chronic medical conditions across various demographic variables. Main investigation areas: fundamentals and best practice of patient safety, sources of information, attitudes towards telemedicine and clinical trials, participation to health care improvement and identification of relevant experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings revealed limited knowledge of patient safety fundamentals, clinical trials and telemedicine, and better knowledge of patient safety practices. No significant differences emerged between patients and citizens regarding the understanding of medical error (60.8% patients versus 64.1% citizens) and adverse event (17.8% patients versus 15.9% citizens). The only significant difference concerning good practices relates to the interference of food with therapy (82.3% patients versus 72.5% citizens). The patient safety responsibility is attributed mainly to physicians (68% patients versus 66% citizens), then to management (48% patients versus 49% citizens) and nurses (41% patients versus 42% citizens).No statistically significant differences were found between citizens with/without chronic diseases; being over 44 years and/or having high-level education were associated with better culture. Structured citizen engagement is not widespread in the country.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Effective strategies for cultivating health care quality and safety culture among citizens are needed, as well as enhancing and monitoring medical information, especially in view of telemedicine and artificial intelligence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Patient Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Patient Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001391\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001391","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:公众参与质量和安全改进对卫生保健至关重要。为了有效地参与,在用户和员工之间协调知识、语言和价值观似乎是必不可少的。本研究旨在评估有/无慢性疾病的意大利公民的代表性样本中的患者安全文化和知识。方法:通过电子邮件向具有全国代表性的人口数据库(意大利米兰DOXA)分发半结构化、自我管理的问卷。在发送的5678封邮件中,邮件回复率为21%。样本由1200人组成,其中400人患有需要定期住院的严重慢性病(称为“病人”),800人没有这种疾病(称为“公民”)。进行了描述性和推断性统计分析,比较了不同人口统计变量中有/没有慢性疾病的受试者。主要调查领域:病人安全的基本原则和最佳做法、信息来源、对远程医疗和临床试验的态度、参与改善保健和确定相关经验。结果:调查结果显示患者安全基础知识、临床试验和远程医疗知识有限,患者安全实践知识较好。患者和市民对医疗差错(患者60.8%比市民64.1%)和不良事件(患者17.8%比市民15.9%)的认识差异无统计学意义。关于良好做法的唯一显著差异涉及食物与治疗的干扰(82.3%的患者对72.5%的市民)。患者安全责任主要归于医生(68%的患者对66%的市民),其次是管理人员(48%的患者对49%的市民)和护士(41%的患者对42%的市民)。有/没有慢性疾病的公民之间无统计学差异;44岁以上和/或受过高等教育与更好的文化有关。有组织的公民参与在这个国家并不普遍。结论:需要有效的策略来培养公民的医疗质量和安全文化,加强和监测医疗信息,特别是在远程医疗和人工智能的背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Patient Safety Culture Among Citizens: A Survey Study.

Objectives: Public engagement in quality and safety improvement is crucial in health care. To have an effective participation, it appears essential to align knowledge, language, and values among users and workers. Present study is aimed to assess patient safety culture and knowledge among a representative sample of Italian citizens, with/without chronic medical conditions.

Methods: A semistructured, self-administered questionnaire was distributed through email to a nationally representative population database (DOXA, Milan, Italy). The email response rate was 21% out of 5678 emails sent. The sample consisted of 1200 individuals, of whom 400 had severe chronic conditions requiring regular hospital visits (referred to as "patients") and 800 did not have such conditions (referred to as "citizens").Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were done, comparing subjects with/without chronic medical conditions across various demographic variables. Main investigation areas: fundamentals and best practice of patient safety, sources of information, attitudes towards telemedicine and clinical trials, participation to health care improvement and identification of relevant experiences.

Results: Findings revealed limited knowledge of patient safety fundamentals, clinical trials and telemedicine, and better knowledge of patient safety practices. No significant differences emerged between patients and citizens regarding the understanding of medical error (60.8% patients versus 64.1% citizens) and adverse event (17.8% patients versus 15.9% citizens). The only significant difference concerning good practices relates to the interference of food with therapy (82.3% patients versus 72.5% citizens). The patient safety responsibility is attributed mainly to physicians (68% patients versus 66% citizens), then to management (48% patients versus 49% citizens) and nurses (41% patients versus 42% citizens).No statistically significant differences were found between citizens with/without chronic diseases; being over 44 years and/or having high-level education were associated with better culture. Structured citizen engagement is not widespread in the country.

Conclusions: Effective strategies for cultivating health care quality and safety culture among citizens are needed, as well as enhancing and monitoring medical information, especially in view of telemedicine and artificial intelligence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信