对暴露治疗中虚拟现实使用的态度:来自德国从业者的数据以及演示如何改变他们。

IF 3 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Daniel Badeja, Florian Schier, Matthew McGinity, Jürgen Hoyer
{"title":"对暴露治疗中虚拟现实使用的态度:来自德国从业者的数据以及演示如何改变他们。","authors":"Daniel Badeja, Florian Schier, Matthew McGinity, Jürgen Hoyer","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2025.2534978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) is well applicable within the framework of cognitive-behavioural anxiety treatment, yet its acceptance and implementation in psychotherapeutic practice remain unclear. This study assessed VRET-related attitudes among German psychotherapists and the impact of a brief demonstration on their intention to use VRET.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study involved an online survey (<i>N</i> = 140) and an optional on-site scenario demonstration (<i>n</i> = 45). Self-reported attitudes, experience rates, and Usage Intention were assessed. Predictors of Usage Intention were identified via hierarchical multiple regression. A linear mixed model estimated the demonstration's effect on Usage Intention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 7.9% of participants reported at least occasional VR use in practice. A majority (78.7%) indicated a generally positive attitude towards VRET. While 77.9% participants could <i>imagine</i> integrating VRET into their work, only 20.0% reported intending to do so in the next year. Usage Intention was predicted by Performance Expectancy and Facilitating Conditions, increasing significantly (<i>d</i> = 1.50) from screening to post-demonstration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite their interest in VR, VRET implementation among German psychotherapists' remains low. The substantial impact of hands-on demonstrations indicates the potential of experiential education programmes in promoting early-stage dissemination.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attitudes towards virtual reality usage in exposure treatment: Data from German practitioners and how a demonstration changes them.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Badeja, Florian Schier, Matthew McGinity, Jürgen Hoyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10503307.2025.2534978\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) is well applicable within the framework of cognitive-behavioural anxiety treatment, yet its acceptance and implementation in psychotherapeutic practice remain unclear. This study assessed VRET-related attitudes among German psychotherapists and the impact of a brief demonstration on their intention to use VRET.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study involved an online survey (<i>N</i> = 140) and an optional on-site scenario demonstration (<i>n</i> = 45). Self-reported attitudes, experience rates, and Usage Intention were assessed. Predictors of Usage Intention were identified via hierarchical multiple regression. A linear mixed model estimated the demonstration's effect on Usage Intention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 7.9% of participants reported at least occasional VR use in practice. A majority (78.7%) indicated a generally positive attitude towards VRET. While 77.9% participants could <i>imagine</i> integrating VRET into their work, only 20.0% reported intending to do so in the next year. Usage Intention was predicted by Performance Expectancy and Facilitating Conditions, increasing significantly (<i>d</i> = 1.50) from screening to post-demonstration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite their interest in VR, VRET implementation among German psychotherapists' remains low. The substantial impact of hands-on demonstrations indicates the potential of experiential education programmes in promoting early-stage dissemination.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychotherapy Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychotherapy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2025.2534978\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2025.2534978","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虚拟现实暴露疗法(Virtual reality exposure therapy, VRET)在认知行为焦虑治疗的框架内非常适用,但其在心理治疗实践中的接受和实施尚不清楚。本研究评估了德国心理治疗师与VRET相关的态度,以及一个简短的演示对他们使用VRET的意图的影响。方法:采用在线调查(N = 140)和可选的现场场景演示(N = 45)。评估了自我报告的态度、经验率和使用意图。使用意向的预测因子通过分层多元回归确定。一个线性混合模型估计演示对使用意愿的影响。结果:只有7.9%的参与者报告在实践中至少偶尔使用VR。大多数人(78.7%)对VRET持普遍积极态度。虽然77.9%的参与者可以想象将VRET整合到他们的工作中,但只有20.0%的人表示打算在明年这样做。使用意愿由性能预期和促进条件预测,从筛选到示范后显著增加(d = 1.50)。结论:尽管他们对VR感兴趣,但德国心理治疗师的VRET实施率仍然很低。亲身示范的重大影响表明经验教育方案在促进早期传播方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Attitudes towards virtual reality usage in exposure treatment: Data from German practitioners and how a demonstration changes them.

Background: Virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) is well applicable within the framework of cognitive-behavioural anxiety treatment, yet its acceptance and implementation in psychotherapeutic practice remain unclear. This study assessed VRET-related attitudes among German psychotherapists and the impact of a brief demonstration on their intention to use VRET.

Methods: The study involved an online survey (N = 140) and an optional on-site scenario demonstration (n = 45). Self-reported attitudes, experience rates, and Usage Intention were assessed. Predictors of Usage Intention were identified via hierarchical multiple regression. A linear mixed model estimated the demonstration's effect on Usage Intention.

Results: Only 7.9% of participants reported at least occasional VR use in practice. A majority (78.7%) indicated a generally positive attitude towards VRET. While 77.9% participants could imagine integrating VRET into their work, only 20.0% reported intending to do so in the next year. Usage Intention was predicted by Performance Expectancy and Facilitating Conditions, increasing significantly (d = 1.50) from screening to post-demonstration.

Conclusion: Despite their interest in VR, VRET implementation among German psychotherapists' remains low. The substantial impact of hands-on demonstrations indicates the potential of experiential education programmes in promoting early-stage dissemination.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychotherapy Research
Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
10.30%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy Research seeks to enhance the development, scientific quality, and social relevance of psychotherapy research and to foster the use of research findings in practice, education, and policy formulation. The Journal publishes reports of original research on all aspects of psychotherapy, including its outcomes, its processes, education of practitioners, and delivery of services. It also publishes methodological, theoretical, and review articles of direct relevance to psychotherapy research. The Journal is addressed to an international, interdisciplinary audience and welcomes submissions dealing with diverse theoretical orientations, treatment modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信