恶性中央气道梗阻的硬性支气管镜检查的安全性和结果。

Q3 Medicine
Medical Journal of Malaysia Pub Date : 2025-07-01
R L Ho, S S Kho, C S Chai, S Eng, S K Chan, M C Yong, S T Tie
{"title":"恶性中央气道梗阻的硬性支气管镜检查的安全性和结果。","authors":"R L Ho, S S Kho, C S Chai, S Eng, S K Chan, M C Yong, S T Tie","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Malignant central airway obstruction (CAO) affects 20-30% of patients with primary lung cancer and is associated with poor prognosis without treatment. Therapeutic rigid bronchoscopy (RB) is an essential diagnostic and therapeutic tool in this group of patients. We aimed to assess the overall procedural outcomes and safety of RB for symptomatic malignant CAO at our institution.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Retrospective chart review included 57 patients with malignant CAO who underwent RB between March 2016 and June 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our cohort comprised 75.4% males with a median age of 60 years. Isolated right and left main bronchus involvement was observed in 50% and 41.7% of the patients, respectively, with 21.1% experiencing concurrent tracheal involvement. In our cohort, 80% had primary lung cancer, with 35.1% of these cases being squamous cell carcinoma. The re-canalization success rate was 98%, with no intraoperative or immediate postoperative mortality. More than half of the patients (54.4%) required airway stenting to maintain patency after re-canalization. Patients with tracheal involvement, non-intrinsic type of CAO, and right main bronchus involvement had a higher likelihood of requiring airway stenting. There were 24 cases with mild, self-limiting complications and 3 cases with severe procedure-related complications. The 30-day survival rate of our cohort was 91.6%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RB is a safe and effective procedure in patients with malignant CAO. Long term prospective data from multiple centers in our region are anticipated to determine long-term safety and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":39388,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","volume":"80 4","pages":"425-431"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Procedural safety and outcome of rigid bronchoscopy in malignant central airway obstruction.\",\"authors\":\"R L Ho, S S Kho, C S Chai, S Eng, S K Chan, M C Yong, S T Tie\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Malignant central airway obstruction (CAO) affects 20-30% of patients with primary lung cancer and is associated with poor prognosis without treatment. Therapeutic rigid bronchoscopy (RB) is an essential diagnostic and therapeutic tool in this group of patients. We aimed to assess the overall procedural outcomes and safety of RB for symptomatic malignant CAO at our institution.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Retrospective chart review included 57 patients with malignant CAO who underwent RB between March 2016 and June 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our cohort comprised 75.4% males with a median age of 60 years. Isolated right and left main bronchus involvement was observed in 50% and 41.7% of the patients, respectively, with 21.1% experiencing concurrent tracheal involvement. In our cohort, 80% had primary lung cancer, with 35.1% of these cases being squamous cell carcinoma. The re-canalization success rate was 98%, with no intraoperative or immediate postoperative mortality. More than half of the patients (54.4%) required airway stenting to maintain patency after re-canalization. Patients with tracheal involvement, non-intrinsic type of CAO, and right main bronchus involvement had a higher likelihood of requiring airway stenting. There were 24 cases with mild, self-limiting complications and 3 cases with severe procedure-related complications. The 30-day survival rate of our cohort was 91.6%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RB is a safe and effective procedure in patients with malignant CAO. Long term prospective data from multiple centers in our region are anticipated to determine long-term safety and outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Journal of Malaysia\",\"volume\":\"80 4\",\"pages\":\"425-431\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Journal of Malaysia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

恶性中央气道阻塞(CAO)影响20-30%的原发性肺癌患者,如果不进行治疗,预后较差。治疗性刚性支气管镜检查(RB)是本组患者必不可少的诊断和治疗工具。我们的目的是评估本院RB治疗症状性恶性CAO的总体手术结果和安全性。材料与方法:回顾性分析2016年3月至2022年6月间行RB治疗的恶性CAO患者57例。结果:我们的队列包括75.4%的男性,中位年龄为60岁。孤立性右、左主支气管受累分别占50%和41.7%,同时发生气管受累的占21.1%。在我们的队列中,80%患有原发性肺癌,其中35.1%为鳞状细胞癌。再通成功率为98%,无术中或术后立即死亡。超过一半的患者(54.4%)在再通后需要气道支架维持通畅。气管受累、非内禀型曹操和右主支气管受累的患者需要气道支架植入术的可能性更高。轻度自限性并发症24例,重度手术相关并发症3例。30天生存率为91.6%。结论:RB是一种安全有效的治疗恶性曹操的方法。来自本地区多个中心的长期前瞻性数据预计将确定长期安全性和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Procedural safety and outcome of rigid bronchoscopy in malignant central airway obstruction.

Introduction: Malignant central airway obstruction (CAO) affects 20-30% of patients with primary lung cancer and is associated with poor prognosis without treatment. Therapeutic rigid bronchoscopy (RB) is an essential diagnostic and therapeutic tool in this group of patients. We aimed to assess the overall procedural outcomes and safety of RB for symptomatic malignant CAO at our institution.

Materials and methods: Retrospective chart review included 57 patients with malignant CAO who underwent RB between March 2016 and June 2022.

Results: Our cohort comprised 75.4% males with a median age of 60 years. Isolated right and left main bronchus involvement was observed in 50% and 41.7% of the patients, respectively, with 21.1% experiencing concurrent tracheal involvement. In our cohort, 80% had primary lung cancer, with 35.1% of these cases being squamous cell carcinoma. The re-canalization success rate was 98%, with no intraoperative or immediate postoperative mortality. More than half of the patients (54.4%) required airway stenting to maintain patency after re-canalization. Patients with tracheal involvement, non-intrinsic type of CAO, and right main bronchus involvement had a higher likelihood of requiring airway stenting. There were 24 cases with mild, self-limiting complications and 3 cases with severe procedure-related complications. The 30-day survival rate of our cohort was 91.6%.

Conclusion: RB is a safe and effective procedure in patients with malignant CAO. Long term prospective data from multiple centers in our region are anticipated to determine long-term safety and outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Malaysia
Medical Journal of Malaysia Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
165
期刊介绍: Published since 1890 this journal originated as the Journal of the Straits Medical Association. With the formation of the Malaysian Medical Association (MMA), the Journal became the official organ, supervised by an editorial board. Some of the early Hon. Editors were Mr. H.M. McGladdery (1960 - 1964), Dr. A.A. Sandosham (1965 - 1977), Prof. Paul C.Y. Chen (1977 - 1987). It is a scientific journal, published quarterly and can be found in medical libraries in many parts of the world. The Journal also enjoys the status of being listed in the Index Medicus, the internationally accepted reference index of medical journals. The editorial columns often reflect the Association''s views and attitudes towards medical problems in the country. The MJM aims to be a peer reviewed scientific journal of the highest quality. We want to ensure that whatever data is published is true and any opinion expressed important to medical science. We believe being Malaysian is our unique niche; our priority will be for scientific knowledge about diseases found in Malaysia and for the practice of medicine in Malaysia. The MJM will archive knowledge about the changing pattern of human diseases and our endeavours to overcome them. It will also document how medicine develops as a profession in the nation. We will communicate and co-operate with other scientific journals in Malaysia. We seek articles that are of educational value to doctors. We will consider all unsolicited articles submitted to the journal and will commission distinguished Malaysians to write relevant review articles. We want to help doctors make better decisions and be good at judging the value of scientific data. We want to help doctors write better, to be articulate and precise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信