Jin-Xi Yuan, Constance E D Osborne, Ibrahim Almafreji, Bronwen Connolly, Andrew J Boyle, Mary Gemma Cherry, Brian W Johnston, Karen Williams, Christina Jones, Peter Fisher, Ingeborg D Welters, Alicia Ac Waite
{"title":"为COVID-19危重疾病幸存者提供后续服务:一项英国全国调查。","authors":"Jin-Xi Yuan, Constance E D Osborne, Ibrahim Almafreji, Bronwen Connolly, Andrew J Boyle, Mary Gemma Cherry, Brian W Johnston, Karen Williams, Christina Jones, Peter Fisher, Ingeborg D Welters, Alicia Ac Waite","doi":"10.1177/17511437251334354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intensive care unit (ICU) survivors in the United Kingdom (UK) can receive support from ICU follow-up services in their process of recovery and rehabilitation. However, it is unclear whether the COVID-19 pandemic impacted the ability of UK hospitals to provide follow-up. The objective of this study was to evaluate the provision of follow-up services in the UK for adult survivors of COVID-19 critical illness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All adult National Health Service (NHS) ICUs in the UK were invited to participate. Intensive care clinicians aware of follow-up services offered at their site were invited to complete a self-administered online electronic survey. Free text answers were thematically analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>174 of 242 (71.9%) NHS hospitals responded to the survey. 140 (80.5%) of the respondent hospitals had an ICU follow-up service for survivors of COVID-19 critical illness. A new service was created at 28 (16.1%) hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. ICU follow-up services were mostly delivered by nurses (125/140, 89.3%), ICU doctors (111/140, 79.3%), physiotherapists (88/140, 62.9%) and psychologists (59/140, 42.1%). Where ICU follow-up services already existed, changes were made in 111 (79.3%) hospitals during the pandemic and these were maintained in 89 (80.2%) hospitals. Funding was a commonly reported reason for whether follow-up services were offered.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was an expansion in the number of ICU follow-up clinics, and the multidisciplinary team delivering post-ICU care to patients who survived COVID-19 critical illness. Many changes to clinic operations introduced during the pandemic persisted, including the use of virtual and hybrid follow-up clinic models.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":" ","pages":"343-352"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12303922/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Provision of follow-up services for survivors of COVID-19 critical illness: A UK national survey.\",\"authors\":\"Jin-Xi Yuan, Constance E D Osborne, Ibrahim Almafreji, Bronwen Connolly, Andrew J Boyle, Mary Gemma Cherry, Brian W Johnston, Karen Williams, Christina Jones, Peter Fisher, Ingeborg D Welters, Alicia Ac Waite\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17511437251334354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intensive care unit (ICU) survivors in the United Kingdom (UK) can receive support from ICU follow-up services in their process of recovery and rehabilitation. However, it is unclear whether the COVID-19 pandemic impacted the ability of UK hospitals to provide follow-up. The objective of this study was to evaluate the provision of follow-up services in the UK for adult survivors of COVID-19 critical illness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All adult National Health Service (NHS) ICUs in the UK were invited to participate. Intensive care clinicians aware of follow-up services offered at their site were invited to complete a self-administered online electronic survey. Free text answers were thematically analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>174 of 242 (71.9%) NHS hospitals responded to the survey. 140 (80.5%) of the respondent hospitals had an ICU follow-up service for survivors of COVID-19 critical illness. A new service was created at 28 (16.1%) hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. ICU follow-up services were mostly delivered by nurses (125/140, 89.3%), ICU doctors (111/140, 79.3%), physiotherapists (88/140, 62.9%) and psychologists (59/140, 42.1%). Where ICU follow-up services already existed, changes were made in 111 (79.3%) hospitals during the pandemic and these were maintained in 89 (80.2%) hospitals. Funding was a commonly reported reason for whether follow-up services were offered.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was an expansion in the number of ICU follow-up clinics, and the multidisciplinary team delivering post-ICU care to patients who survived COVID-19 critical illness. Many changes to clinic operations introduced during the pandemic persisted, including the use of virtual and hybrid follow-up clinic models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Intensive Care Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"343-352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12303922/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Intensive Care Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437251334354\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437251334354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Provision of follow-up services for survivors of COVID-19 critical illness: A UK national survey.
Background: Intensive care unit (ICU) survivors in the United Kingdom (UK) can receive support from ICU follow-up services in their process of recovery and rehabilitation. However, it is unclear whether the COVID-19 pandemic impacted the ability of UK hospitals to provide follow-up. The objective of this study was to evaluate the provision of follow-up services in the UK for adult survivors of COVID-19 critical illness.
Methods: All adult National Health Service (NHS) ICUs in the UK were invited to participate. Intensive care clinicians aware of follow-up services offered at their site were invited to complete a self-administered online electronic survey. Free text answers were thematically analysed.
Results: 174 of 242 (71.9%) NHS hospitals responded to the survey. 140 (80.5%) of the respondent hospitals had an ICU follow-up service for survivors of COVID-19 critical illness. A new service was created at 28 (16.1%) hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. ICU follow-up services were mostly delivered by nurses (125/140, 89.3%), ICU doctors (111/140, 79.3%), physiotherapists (88/140, 62.9%) and psychologists (59/140, 42.1%). Where ICU follow-up services already existed, changes were made in 111 (79.3%) hospitals during the pandemic and these were maintained in 89 (80.2%) hospitals. Funding was a commonly reported reason for whether follow-up services were offered.
Conclusions: There was an expansion in the number of ICU follow-up clinics, and the multidisciplinary team delivering post-ICU care to patients who survived COVID-19 critical illness. Many changes to clinic operations introduced during the pandemic persisted, including the use of virtual and hybrid follow-up clinic models.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Intensive Care Society (JICS) is an international, peer-reviewed journal that strives to disseminate clinically and scientifically relevant peer-reviewed research, evaluation, experience and opinion to all staff working in the field of intensive care medicine. Our aim is to inform clinicians on the provision of best practice and provide direction for innovative scientific research in what is one of the broadest and most multi-disciplinary healthcare specialties. While original articles and systematic reviews lie at the heart of the Journal, we also value and recognise the need for opinion articles, case reports and correspondence to guide clinically and scientifically important areas in which conclusive evidence is lacking. The style of the Journal is based on its founding mission statement to ‘instruct, inform and entertain by encompassing the best aspects of both tabloid and broadsheet''.