解释护理需求评估调查:对本地和全球最先进的可解释人工智能方法进行定性和定量评估。

IF 3.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JAMIA Open Pub Date : 2025-07-29 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf064
Necip Oğuz Şerbetci, Stefan Blüher, Paul Gellert, Ulf Leser
{"title":"解释护理需求评估调查:对本地和全球最先进的可解释人工智能方法进行定性和定量评估。","authors":"Necip Oğuz Şerbetci, Stefan Blüher, Paul Gellert, Ulf Leser","doi":"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>With extended life expectancy, the number of people in need of care has been growing. To optimally support them, it is important to know the patterns and conditions of their daily life that influence the need for support, and thus, the classification of the care need. In this study, we aim to utilize a large corpus consisting of care benefits applications to do an explorative analysis of factors affecting care need to support the tedious work of experts gathering reliable criteria for a care need assessment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We compare state-of-the-art methods from explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) as means to extract such patterns from over 72 000 German care benefits applications. We train transformer models to predict assessment results as decided by a Medical Service Unit from accompanying text notes. To understand the key factors for care need assessment and its constituent modules (such as mobility and self-therapy), we apply feature attribution methods to extract the key phrases for each prediction. These local explanations are then aggregated into global insights to derive key phrases for different modules and severity of care need over the dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our experiments show that transformers-based models perform slightly better than traditional bag-of-words baselines in predicting care need. We find that the bag-of-words baseline also provides useful care-relevant phrases, whereas phrases obtained through transformer explanations better balance rare and common phrases, such as diagnoses mentioned only once, and are better in assigning the correct assessment module.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Even though XAI results can become unwieldy, they let us get an understanding of thousands of documents with no extra annotations other than existing assessment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This work provides a systematic application and comparison of both traditional and state-of-the-art deep learning based XAI approaches to extract insights from a large corpus of text. Both traditional and deep learning approaches provide useful phrases, and we recommend using both to explore and understand large text corpora better. We will make our code available at https://github.com/oguzserbetci/explainer.</p>","PeriodicalId":36278,"journal":{"name":"JAMIA Open","volume":"8 4","pages":"ooaf064"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12307913/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explaining care need assessment surveys: qualitative and quantitative evaluation of state-of-the-art local and global explainable artificial intelligence methods.\",\"authors\":\"Necip Oğuz Şerbetci, Stefan Blüher, Paul Gellert, Ulf Leser\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>With extended life expectancy, the number of people in need of care has been growing. To optimally support them, it is important to know the patterns and conditions of their daily life that influence the need for support, and thus, the classification of the care need. In this study, we aim to utilize a large corpus consisting of care benefits applications to do an explorative analysis of factors affecting care need to support the tedious work of experts gathering reliable criteria for a care need assessment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We compare state-of-the-art methods from explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) as means to extract such patterns from over 72 000 German care benefits applications. We train transformer models to predict assessment results as decided by a Medical Service Unit from accompanying text notes. To understand the key factors for care need assessment and its constituent modules (such as mobility and self-therapy), we apply feature attribution methods to extract the key phrases for each prediction. These local explanations are then aggregated into global insights to derive key phrases for different modules and severity of care need over the dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our experiments show that transformers-based models perform slightly better than traditional bag-of-words baselines in predicting care need. We find that the bag-of-words baseline also provides useful care-relevant phrases, whereas phrases obtained through transformer explanations better balance rare and common phrases, such as diagnoses mentioned only once, and are better in assigning the correct assessment module.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Even though XAI results can become unwieldy, they let us get an understanding of thousands of documents with no extra annotations other than existing assessment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This work provides a systematic application and comparison of both traditional and state-of-the-art deep learning based XAI approaches to extract insights from a large corpus of text. Both traditional and deep learning approaches provide useful phrases, and we recommend using both to explore and understand large text corpora better. We will make our code available at https://github.com/oguzserbetci/explainer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMIA Open\",\"volume\":\"8 4\",\"pages\":\"ooaf064\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12307913/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMIA Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMIA Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:随着预期寿命的延长,需要护理的人数不断增加。为了最佳地支持他们,重要的是要了解影响支持需求的日常生活模式和条件,从而了解护理需求的分类。在这项研究中,我们的目标是利用一个由护理福利申请组成的大型语料库,对影响护理需求的因素进行探索性分析,以支持专家收集可靠的护理需求评估标准的繁琐工作。材料和方法:我们比较了来自可解释人工智能(XAI)的最先进的方法,作为从超过72000个德国护理福利申请中提取此类模式的手段。我们训练变压器模型来预测由医疗服务单位根据随附的文本注释决定的评估结果。为了了解护理需求评估的关键因素及其组成模块(如流动性和自我治疗),我们应用特征归因方法提取每个预测的关键短语。然后,这些局部解释被汇总成全局见解,从而得出数据集中不同模块和护理需求严重程度的关键短语。结果:我们的实验表明,基于变压器的模型在预测护理需求方面比传统的词袋基线稍好。我们发现词袋基线也提供了有用的护理相关短语,而通过转换解释获得的短语更好地平衡了罕见和常见短语,例如只提到一次的诊断,并且更好地分配正确的评估模块。讨论:尽管XAI结果可能会变得笨拙,但它们使我们能够理解数千个文档,除了现有的评估结果之外,不需要额外的注释。结论:这项工作提供了传统和最先进的基于深度学习的XAI方法的系统应用和比较,以从大量文本语料库中提取见解。传统和深度学习方法都提供了有用的短语,我们建议使用这两种方法来更好地探索和理解大型文本语料库。我们将在https://github.com/oguzserbetci/explainer上提供我们的代码。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Explaining care need assessment surveys: qualitative and quantitative evaluation of state-of-the-art local and global explainable artificial intelligence methods.

Explaining care need assessment surveys: qualitative and quantitative evaluation of state-of-the-art local and global explainable artificial intelligence methods.

Explaining care need assessment surveys: qualitative and quantitative evaluation of state-of-the-art local and global explainable artificial intelligence methods.

Explaining care need assessment surveys: qualitative and quantitative evaluation of state-of-the-art local and global explainable artificial intelligence methods.

Objective: With extended life expectancy, the number of people in need of care has been growing. To optimally support them, it is important to know the patterns and conditions of their daily life that influence the need for support, and thus, the classification of the care need. In this study, we aim to utilize a large corpus consisting of care benefits applications to do an explorative analysis of factors affecting care need to support the tedious work of experts gathering reliable criteria for a care need assessment.

Materials and methods: We compare state-of-the-art methods from explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) as means to extract such patterns from over 72 000 German care benefits applications. We train transformer models to predict assessment results as decided by a Medical Service Unit from accompanying text notes. To understand the key factors for care need assessment and its constituent modules (such as mobility and self-therapy), we apply feature attribution methods to extract the key phrases for each prediction. These local explanations are then aggregated into global insights to derive key phrases for different modules and severity of care need over the dataset.

Results: Our experiments show that transformers-based models perform slightly better than traditional bag-of-words baselines in predicting care need. We find that the bag-of-words baseline also provides useful care-relevant phrases, whereas phrases obtained through transformer explanations better balance rare and common phrases, such as diagnoses mentioned only once, and are better in assigning the correct assessment module.

Discussion: Even though XAI results can become unwieldy, they let us get an understanding of thousands of documents with no extra annotations other than existing assessment outcomes.

Conclusion: This work provides a systematic application and comparison of both traditional and state-of-the-art deep learning based XAI approaches to extract insights from a large corpus of text. Both traditional and deep learning approaches provide useful phrases, and we recommend using both to explore and understand large text corpora better. We will make our code available at https://github.com/oguzserbetci/explainer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMIA Open
JAMIA Open Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
102
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信