Pınar Yıldız, Esra Keles, Gazi Yıldız, Pınar Birol İlter, Kasım Turan, Mehmet Mete Kirlangic, Murat Levent Dereli, Fatih Şanlıkan, Batuhan Çağlar, Emre Mat
{"title":"子宫操纵器在腹式全子宫切除术中的疗效:一项三盲随机对照试验。","authors":"Pınar Yıldız, Esra Keles, Gazi Yıldız, Pınar Birol İlter, Kasım Turan, Mehmet Mete Kirlangic, Murat Levent Dereli, Fatih Şanlıkan, Batuhan Çağlar, Emre Mat","doi":"10.1177/15533506251360840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe objective of this study was to investigate whether the advantages of uterine manipulators in laparoscopic hysterectomy could also be applied to abdominal hysterectomy. In the present study, we introduce a novel surgical technique that employs a uterine manipulator during open surgery and analyze the outcomes of this approach.MethodsA prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary research hospital with patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign gynecological indications between October 2023 and March 2024. Patients were randomly assigned to either conventional abdominal hysterectomy or manipulator-assisted abdominal hysterectomy. Primary outcomes included operative time, with secondary outcomes including Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay.ResultsAmong the 142 participants, the manipulator group exhibited a mean operative time of 92.2 ± 11.1 minutes compared to 107.6 ± 14.4 minutes in the control group (<i>P</i> < .001). Length of hospital stay was also significantly shorter in the manipulator group (42.3 ± 14.7 hours vs 47.4 ± 15.8 hours; <i>P</i> = .046). No significant differences were observed in postoperative complications or pain scores between groups. The mean postoperative hemoglobin decrease was significantly lower in the manipulator group (0.74 ± 0.28 g/dL) compared to the control group (1.52 ± 0.33 g/dL) (<i>P</i> < .001).ConclusionThe incorporation of a uterine manipulator in abdominal hysterectomy significantly reduces operative time, colpotomy time, and hospital stay while maintaining a comparable safety profile to conventional techniques. These findings suggest that uterine manipulators may enhance surgical efficiency and could be beneficial in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"15533506251360840"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Uterine Manipulator in Total Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Triple-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Pınar Yıldız, Esra Keles, Gazi Yıldız, Pınar Birol İlter, Kasım Turan, Mehmet Mete Kirlangic, Murat Levent Dereli, Fatih Şanlıkan, Batuhan Çağlar, Emre Mat\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15533506251360840\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundThe objective of this study was to investigate whether the advantages of uterine manipulators in laparoscopic hysterectomy could also be applied to abdominal hysterectomy. In the present study, we introduce a novel surgical technique that employs a uterine manipulator during open surgery and analyze the outcomes of this approach.MethodsA prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary research hospital with patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign gynecological indications between October 2023 and March 2024. Patients were randomly assigned to either conventional abdominal hysterectomy or manipulator-assisted abdominal hysterectomy. Primary outcomes included operative time, with secondary outcomes including Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay.ResultsAmong the 142 participants, the manipulator group exhibited a mean operative time of 92.2 ± 11.1 minutes compared to 107.6 ± 14.4 minutes in the control group (<i>P</i> < .001). Length of hospital stay was also significantly shorter in the manipulator group (42.3 ± 14.7 hours vs 47.4 ± 15.8 hours; <i>P</i> = .046). No significant differences were observed in postoperative complications or pain scores between groups. The mean postoperative hemoglobin decrease was significantly lower in the manipulator group (0.74 ± 0.28 g/dL) compared to the control group (1.52 ± 0.33 g/dL) (<i>P</i> < .001).ConclusionThe incorporation of a uterine manipulator in abdominal hysterectomy significantly reduces operative time, colpotomy time, and hospital stay while maintaining a comparable safety profile to conventional techniques. These findings suggest that uterine manipulators may enhance surgical efficiency and could be beneficial in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Innovation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15533506251360840\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251360840\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251360840","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy of Uterine Manipulator in Total Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Triple-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.
BackgroundThe objective of this study was to investigate whether the advantages of uterine manipulators in laparoscopic hysterectomy could also be applied to abdominal hysterectomy. In the present study, we introduce a novel surgical technique that employs a uterine manipulator during open surgery and analyze the outcomes of this approach.MethodsA prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary research hospital with patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign gynecological indications between October 2023 and March 2024. Patients were randomly assigned to either conventional abdominal hysterectomy or manipulator-assisted abdominal hysterectomy. Primary outcomes included operative time, with secondary outcomes including Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay.ResultsAmong the 142 participants, the manipulator group exhibited a mean operative time of 92.2 ± 11.1 minutes compared to 107.6 ± 14.4 minutes in the control group (P < .001). Length of hospital stay was also significantly shorter in the manipulator group (42.3 ± 14.7 hours vs 47.4 ± 15.8 hours; P = .046). No significant differences were observed in postoperative complications or pain scores between groups. The mean postoperative hemoglobin decrease was significantly lower in the manipulator group (0.74 ± 0.28 g/dL) compared to the control group (1.52 ± 0.33 g/dL) (P < .001).ConclusionThe incorporation of a uterine manipulator in abdominal hysterectomy significantly reduces operative time, colpotomy time, and hospital stay while maintaining a comparable safety profile to conventional techniques. These findings suggest that uterine manipulators may enhance surgical efficiency and could be beneficial in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Surgical Innovation (SRI) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal focusing on minimally invasive surgical techniques, new instruments such as laparoscopes and endoscopes, and new technologies. SRI prepares surgeons to think and work in "the operating room of the future" through learning new techniques, understanding and adapting to new technologies, maintaining surgical competencies, and applying surgical outcomes data to their practices. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).