心理测量学评价西班牙版物理治疗临床实践批判性思维问卷。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-31 DOI:10.1177/02692155251362999
Beatriz Hernández-Méndez, Àlex Ginés-Puertas, Javier Jerez-Roig, Joan-Daniel Martí-Romeu, David Cámara-Menoyo, Jordi Cuartero-Archs, Mercedes Piqueras-Céspedes, María Llaberia-Marcual, Esperanza Zuriguel-Pérez
{"title":"心理测量学评价西班牙版物理治疗临床实践批判性思维问卷。","authors":"Beatriz Hernández-Méndez, Àlex Ginés-Puertas, Javier Jerez-Roig, Joan-Daniel Martí-Romeu, David Cámara-Menoyo, Jordi Cuartero-Archs, Mercedes Piqueras-Céspedes, María Llaberia-Marcual, Esperanza Zuriguel-Pérez","doi":"10.1177/02692155251362999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThe aim was to adapt and validate the Nursing Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice Questionnaire of 109 items in four dimensions, for its application in physiotherapists in Spain.DesignDescriptive, cross-sectional, multicenter psychometric study carried out in two phases: phase 1, adaptation of the Nursing Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice Questionnaire to the physiotherapy setting and analysis of its content validity; phase 2, evaluation of the psychometric properties of the new instrument.SettingPhysiotherapists from a variety of work environments (public and private hospitals, geriatric institutions, home care services, clinics, and primary care, social health, educational and sports centers).ParticipantsA sample of 235 physiotherapists participated, of whom 108 completed the questionnaire for a second time after a two-week interval.Main measuresConstruct validity was analyzed using Confirmatory Factor Analysis, convergent validity and discriminant validity; reliability was analyzed using internal consistency and temporal stability (test-retest method).ResultsThe Average Scale Content Validity Index of 0.96 indicated high content validity. Confirmatory Factor Analysis confirmed the four-dimensional structure on which the original questionnaire is based, with acceptable model fit indices. Cronbach's alpha for the total questionnaire was 0.97, reaching values above 0.70 in each of the dimensions. Lin's Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was 0.71.ConclusionsThe Physiotherapy Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice Questionnaire showed appropriate psychometric properties. Its use among Spanish physiotherapists is recommended.ClinicalTrials.gov IdentifierNCT05059483.URLhttps://clinicaltrials.gov.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1355-1365"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric evaluation of the Spanish version of the physiotherapy critical thinking in clinical practice questionnaire.\",\"authors\":\"Beatriz Hernández-Méndez, Àlex Ginés-Puertas, Javier Jerez-Roig, Joan-Daniel Martí-Romeu, David Cámara-Menoyo, Jordi Cuartero-Archs, Mercedes Piqueras-Céspedes, María Llaberia-Marcual, Esperanza Zuriguel-Pérez\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02692155251362999\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveThe aim was to adapt and validate the Nursing Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice Questionnaire of 109 items in four dimensions, for its application in physiotherapists in Spain.DesignDescriptive, cross-sectional, multicenter psychometric study carried out in two phases: phase 1, adaptation of the Nursing Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice Questionnaire to the physiotherapy setting and analysis of its content validity; phase 2, evaluation of the psychometric properties of the new instrument.SettingPhysiotherapists from a variety of work environments (public and private hospitals, geriatric institutions, home care services, clinics, and primary care, social health, educational and sports centers).ParticipantsA sample of 235 physiotherapists participated, of whom 108 completed the questionnaire for a second time after a two-week interval.Main measuresConstruct validity was analyzed using Confirmatory Factor Analysis, convergent validity and discriminant validity; reliability was analyzed using internal consistency and temporal stability (test-retest method).ResultsThe Average Scale Content Validity Index of 0.96 indicated high content validity. Confirmatory Factor Analysis confirmed the four-dimensional structure on which the original questionnaire is based, with acceptable model fit indices. Cronbach's alpha for the total questionnaire was 0.97, reaching values above 0.70 in each of the dimensions. Lin's Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was 0.71.ConclusionsThe Physiotherapy Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice Questionnaire showed appropriate psychometric properties. Its use among Spanish physiotherapists is recommended.ClinicalTrials.gov IdentifierNCT05059483.URLhttps://clinicaltrials.gov.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1355-1365\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251362999\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251362999","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的对临床实践护理批判性思维问卷(共109项,共4个维度)在西班牙物理治疗师中的应用进行调整和验证。设计描述性、横断面、多中心心理测量学研究分两阶段进行:第一阶段,临床实践护理批判性思维问卷对物理治疗环境的适应及其内容效度分析;第二阶段,评估新仪器的心理测量特性。来自各种工作环境(公立和私立医院、老年机构、家庭护理服务、诊所、初级保健、社会卫生、教育和体育中心)的物理治疗师。235名物理治疗师参与了调查,其中108名在两周间隔后第二次完成调查问卷。主要测量方法:采用验证性因子分析、收敛效度和区别效度对构念进行效度分析;信度分析采用内部一致性和时间稳定性(重测法)。结果量表的平均内容效度指数为0.96,表明内容效度较高。验证性因子分析证实了原问卷所依据的四维结构,模型拟合指标可以接受。整个问卷的Cronbach’s alpha值为0.97,各维度均达到0.70以上。Lin’s class内相关系数为0.71。结论临床实践中物理治疗批判性思维问卷具有适当的心理测量特征。推荐在西班牙物理治疗师中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychometric evaluation of the Spanish version of the physiotherapy critical thinking in clinical practice questionnaire.

ObjectiveThe aim was to adapt and validate the Nursing Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice Questionnaire of 109 items in four dimensions, for its application in physiotherapists in Spain.DesignDescriptive, cross-sectional, multicenter psychometric study carried out in two phases: phase 1, adaptation of the Nursing Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice Questionnaire to the physiotherapy setting and analysis of its content validity; phase 2, evaluation of the psychometric properties of the new instrument.SettingPhysiotherapists from a variety of work environments (public and private hospitals, geriatric institutions, home care services, clinics, and primary care, social health, educational and sports centers).ParticipantsA sample of 235 physiotherapists participated, of whom 108 completed the questionnaire for a second time after a two-week interval.Main measuresConstruct validity was analyzed using Confirmatory Factor Analysis, convergent validity and discriminant validity; reliability was analyzed using internal consistency and temporal stability (test-retest method).ResultsThe Average Scale Content Validity Index of 0.96 indicated high content validity. Confirmatory Factor Analysis confirmed the four-dimensional structure on which the original questionnaire is based, with acceptable model fit indices. Cronbach's alpha for the total questionnaire was 0.97, reaching values above 0.70 in each of the dimensions. Lin's Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was 0.71.ConclusionsThe Physiotherapy Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice Questionnaire showed appropriate psychometric properties. Its use among Spanish physiotherapists is recommended.ClinicalTrials.gov IdentifierNCT05059483.URLhttps://clinicaltrials.gov.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信