实施加强剖腹产术后恢复:一项质量改进倡议。

IF 1.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Melissa Walker, Mara Sobel, Naveed Siddiqi, Jose C A Carvalho, Nighat Jahan, Sara Santini, Nancy Watts, Kim Dart, Stella Wang, Ella Huszti, Jackie Thomas
{"title":"实施加强剖腹产术后恢复:一项质量改进倡议。","authors":"Melissa Walker, Mara Sobel, Naveed Siddiqi, Jose C A Carvalho, Nighat Jahan, Sara Santini, Nancy Watts, Kim Dart, Stella Wang, Ella Huszti, Jackie Thomas","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enhanced recovery after caesarean delivery (ERAC) is a multidisciplinary, evidence-based bundle of interventions developed from Enhanced Recovery After Surgery principles, designed to improve patient outcomes, reduce complications and save healthcare resources. Despite these benefits, the implementation of ERAC within the Canadian healthcare context is unknown. In addition, previous ERAC studies typically excluded patients undergoing unplanned caesarean deliveries (CD). The objective of our study was to evaluate the results of a quality improvement initiative that implemented a comprehensive ERAC pathway for both planned and unplanned CD in a large Canadian obstetric unit, with a specific focus on patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pre-implementation post implementation design was used. The primary outcomes were Obstetric Quality of Recovery Score (ObsQoR-10) and patient satisfaction at 6 weeks postpartum. Secondary outcomes included postpartum length of stay, postoperative pain and maternal infectious morbidity.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Antenatal, intraoperative and postoperative ERAC bundles were developed with multidisciplinary input.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>513 patients were included: 290 pre-implementation (149 planned CD, 141 unplanned CD) and 223 post- implementation (128 planned CD, 95 unplanned CD). Baseline demographics were similar, except the post implementation groups had significantly higher median Body Mass Index (BMI). In planned CD, ObsQoR-10 scores were on average 3.4 points higher in the post-implementation group (95% CI (-0.19 to 6.99); p-value=0.063). Patient satisfaction assessed at 6 weeks postpartum was significantly improved by 12 points in the post-implementation group (95% CI (5.58 to 18.62); p-value<0.001). In unplanned CD, implementation was not associated with ObsQoR-10 (p-value=0.92) or patient satisfaction assessed at 6 weeks postpartum (p-value=0.43). Pain scores were higher in both post-implementation groups, but there were no differences in morphine milliequivalents or requirement for breakthrough opioids. Length of stay and maternal infectious morbidity were similar.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Implementation of ERAC in a large Canadian tertiary care obstetrics unit was feasible and resulted in improved recovery and increased satisfaction in patients undergoing planned CD. There were no differences in other outcomes, including infectious morbidity; however, the contribution of BMI needs to be explored. Patients undergoing unplanned CD face additional challenges related to outcomes, recovery and satisfaction and should be targeted in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12314953/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery for caesarean delivery: a quality improvement initiative.\",\"authors\":\"Melissa Walker, Mara Sobel, Naveed Siddiqi, Jose C A Carvalho, Nighat Jahan, Sara Santini, Nancy Watts, Kim Dart, Stella Wang, Ella Huszti, Jackie Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enhanced recovery after caesarean delivery (ERAC) is a multidisciplinary, evidence-based bundle of interventions developed from Enhanced Recovery After Surgery principles, designed to improve patient outcomes, reduce complications and save healthcare resources. Despite these benefits, the implementation of ERAC within the Canadian healthcare context is unknown. In addition, previous ERAC studies typically excluded patients undergoing unplanned caesarean deliveries (CD). The objective of our study was to evaluate the results of a quality improvement initiative that implemented a comprehensive ERAC pathway for both planned and unplanned CD in a large Canadian obstetric unit, with a specific focus on patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pre-implementation post implementation design was used. The primary outcomes were Obstetric Quality of Recovery Score (ObsQoR-10) and patient satisfaction at 6 weeks postpartum. Secondary outcomes included postpartum length of stay, postoperative pain and maternal infectious morbidity.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Antenatal, intraoperative and postoperative ERAC bundles were developed with multidisciplinary input.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>513 patients were included: 290 pre-implementation (149 planned CD, 141 unplanned CD) and 223 post- implementation (128 planned CD, 95 unplanned CD). Baseline demographics were similar, except the post implementation groups had significantly higher median Body Mass Index (BMI). In planned CD, ObsQoR-10 scores were on average 3.4 points higher in the post-implementation group (95% CI (-0.19 to 6.99); p-value=0.063). Patient satisfaction assessed at 6 weeks postpartum was significantly improved by 12 points in the post-implementation group (95% CI (5.58 to 18.62); p-value<0.001). In unplanned CD, implementation was not associated with ObsQoR-10 (p-value=0.92) or patient satisfaction assessed at 6 weeks postpartum (p-value=0.43). Pain scores were higher in both post-implementation groups, but there were no differences in morphine milliequivalents or requirement for breakthrough opioids. Length of stay and maternal infectious morbidity were similar.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Implementation of ERAC in a large Canadian tertiary care obstetrics unit was feasible and resulted in improved recovery and increased satisfaction in patients undergoing planned CD. There were no differences in other outcomes, including infectious morbidity; however, the contribution of BMI needs to be explored. Patients undergoing unplanned CD face additional challenges related to outcomes, recovery and satisfaction and should be targeted in future studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Quality\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12314953/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003391\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:剖宫产后增强恢复(Enhanced recovery after剖腹产,ERAC)是一种多学科、基于证据的干预措施,从术后增强恢复原则发展而来,旨在改善患者预后、减少并发症和节省医疗资源。尽管有这些好处,但ERAC在加拿大医疗保健环境中的实施情况尚不清楚。此外,以往的ERAC研究通常排除了计划外剖腹产(CD)的患者。本研究的目的是评估质量改进倡议的结果,该倡议在加拿大一家大型产科病房实施了计划内和计划外CD的综合ERAC途径,并特别关注患者报告的结果。方法:采用实施前、实施后设计。主要结局为产科康复质量评分(ObsQoR-10)和产后6周患者满意度。次要结局包括产后住院时间、术后疼痛和产妇感染发病率。干预:产前、术中和术后ERAC包是多学科输入的。结果:纳入513例患者:实施前290例(计划CD 149例,非计划CD 141例),实施后223例(计划CD 128例,非计划CD 95例)。基线人口统计数据相似,但实施后组的中位体重指数(BMI)明显较高。在计划的CD中,实施后组的ObsQoR-10评分平均高出3.4分(95% CI(-0.19至6.99);假定值= 0.063)。实施后组产后6周患者满意度显著提高12点(95% CI (5.58 ~ 18.62);讨论:在加拿大一家大型三级产科医院实施ERAC是可行的,并导致计划CD患者的恢复改善和满意度提高。其他结局无差异,包括感染性发病率;然而,BMI的贡献还有待探讨。发生计划外乳糜泻的患者面临着与结果、恢复和满意度相关的额外挑战,应成为未来研究的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery for caesarean delivery: a quality improvement initiative.

Background: Enhanced recovery after caesarean delivery (ERAC) is a multidisciplinary, evidence-based bundle of interventions developed from Enhanced Recovery After Surgery principles, designed to improve patient outcomes, reduce complications and save healthcare resources. Despite these benefits, the implementation of ERAC within the Canadian healthcare context is unknown. In addition, previous ERAC studies typically excluded patients undergoing unplanned caesarean deliveries (CD). The objective of our study was to evaluate the results of a quality improvement initiative that implemented a comprehensive ERAC pathway for both planned and unplanned CD in a large Canadian obstetric unit, with a specific focus on patient-reported outcomes.

Methods: A pre-implementation post implementation design was used. The primary outcomes were Obstetric Quality of Recovery Score (ObsQoR-10) and patient satisfaction at 6 weeks postpartum. Secondary outcomes included postpartum length of stay, postoperative pain and maternal infectious morbidity.

Intervention: Antenatal, intraoperative and postoperative ERAC bundles were developed with multidisciplinary input.

Results: 513 patients were included: 290 pre-implementation (149 planned CD, 141 unplanned CD) and 223 post- implementation (128 planned CD, 95 unplanned CD). Baseline demographics were similar, except the post implementation groups had significantly higher median Body Mass Index (BMI). In planned CD, ObsQoR-10 scores were on average 3.4 points higher in the post-implementation group (95% CI (-0.19 to 6.99); p-value=0.063). Patient satisfaction assessed at 6 weeks postpartum was significantly improved by 12 points in the post-implementation group (95% CI (5.58 to 18.62); p-value<0.001). In unplanned CD, implementation was not associated with ObsQoR-10 (p-value=0.92) or patient satisfaction assessed at 6 weeks postpartum (p-value=0.43). Pain scores were higher in both post-implementation groups, but there were no differences in morphine milliequivalents or requirement for breakthrough opioids. Length of stay and maternal infectious morbidity were similar.

Discussion: Implementation of ERAC in a large Canadian tertiary care obstetrics unit was feasible and resulted in improved recovery and increased satisfaction in patients undergoing planned CD. There were no differences in other outcomes, including infectious morbidity; however, the contribution of BMI needs to be explored. Patients undergoing unplanned CD face additional challenges related to outcomes, recovery and satisfaction and should be targeted in future studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信