影响急诊科出院和入院决定的非临床因素:以色列医生的焦点小组研究

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Ofer Kobo, Itay Itzhaki, Michael J Drescher, Jacob Glazer, Avi Israeli, Bruce E Landon, Shuli Brammli-Greenberg
{"title":"影响急诊科出院和入院决定的非临床因素:以色列医生的焦点小组研究","authors":"Ofer Kobo, Itay Itzhaki, Michael J Drescher, Jacob Glazer, Avi Israeli, Bruce E Landon, Shuli Brammli-Greenberg","doi":"10.1186/s12873-025-01304-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency department (ED) physicians frequently make high-stakes decisions under time constraints. While clinical indicators are essential, non-clinical factors often shape whether a patient is admitted or discharged. However, the specific non-clinical influences and how physicians perceive them remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify and categorize non-clinical factors that influence admission decisions among ED physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study involved five focus groups with 42 participants (specialists, residents, and physician assistants) across five Israeli hospitals. A semi-structured discussion guide, informed by literature and expert interviews, was used. Audio-recordings were transcribed and analyzed thematically using a mixed inductive and deductive approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three overarching domains of non-clinical influences emerged: (1) patient-related factors (preferences, social support, functional status, access to care), (2) physician-related factors (experience, risk tolerance, workload, prior errors), and (3) system-level factors (bed capacity, ED protocols, communication gaps, resource availability). Physicians often weighed these elements alongside clinical indications for admission, particularly in borderline cases. Functional status and family support frequently influenced safe discharge decisions. Physician experience emerged as a buffer against risk-averse behaviors. System-level pressures, such as ED crowding and administrative policies, further shaped clinical discretion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Non-clinical factors substantially influence ED disposition decisions. These findings highlight the need for policy reforms, decision-support tools, and further research to guide when and how non-clinical factors should inform care. This study offers a framework for understanding such influences and can inform interventions aimed at improving ED efficiency and patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"141"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12312348/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-clinical factors influencing discharge and admission decisions in the emergency department: a focus group study among Israeli physicians.\",\"authors\":\"Ofer Kobo, Itay Itzhaki, Michael J Drescher, Jacob Glazer, Avi Israeli, Bruce E Landon, Shuli Brammli-Greenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12873-025-01304-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency department (ED) physicians frequently make high-stakes decisions under time constraints. While clinical indicators are essential, non-clinical factors often shape whether a patient is admitted or discharged. However, the specific non-clinical influences and how physicians perceive them remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify and categorize non-clinical factors that influence admission decisions among ED physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study involved five focus groups with 42 participants (specialists, residents, and physician assistants) across five Israeli hospitals. A semi-structured discussion guide, informed by literature and expert interviews, was used. Audio-recordings were transcribed and analyzed thematically using a mixed inductive and deductive approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three overarching domains of non-clinical influences emerged: (1) patient-related factors (preferences, social support, functional status, access to care), (2) physician-related factors (experience, risk tolerance, workload, prior errors), and (3) system-level factors (bed capacity, ED protocols, communication gaps, resource availability). Physicians often weighed these elements alongside clinical indications for admission, particularly in borderline cases. Functional status and family support frequently influenced safe discharge decisions. Physician experience emerged as a buffer against risk-averse behaviors. System-level pressures, such as ED crowding and administrative policies, further shaped clinical discretion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Non-clinical factors substantially influence ED disposition decisions. These findings highlight the need for policy reforms, decision-support tools, and further research to guide when and how non-clinical factors should inform care. This study offers a framework for understanding such influences and can inform interventions aimed at improving ED efficiency and patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12312348/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01304-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01304-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急诊科(ED)医生经常在时间限制下做出高风险的决定。虽然临床指标是必不可少的,但非临床因素往往决定患者是否入院或出院。然而,具体的非临床影响以及医生如何看待这些影响仍未得到充分探讨。目的:确定并分类影响急诊科医师住院决定的非临床因素。方法:本定性研究涉及以色列五家医院的五个焦点小组,42名参与者(专家、住院医师和医师助理)。采用了以文献和专家访谈为依据的半结构化讨论指南。录音记录转录和分析主题使用混合归纳和演绎的方法。结果:出现了三个主要的非临床影响领域:(1)患者相关因素(偏好、社会支持、功能状态、获得护理);(2)医生相关因素(经验、风险承受能力、工作量、先前错误);(3)系统级因素(床位容量、急诊科方案、沟通差距、资源可用性)。医生通常会将这些因素与临床适应症一起权衡,特别是在边缘性病例中。功能状况和家庭支持经常影响安全出院的决定。医生的经验成为对风险规避行为的缓冲。系统层面的压力,如急诊科拥挤和行政政策,进一步影响了临床裁量权。结论:非临床因素显著影响ED处置决策。这些发现强调了政策改革、决策支持工具和进一步研究的必要性,以指导何时以及如何将非临床因素告知护理。这项研究为理解这些影响提供了一个框架,并可以为旨在提高ED效率和患者预后的干预措施提供信息。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Non-clinical factors influencing discharge and admission decisions in the emergency department: a focus group study among Israeli physicians.

Non-clinical factors influencing discharge and admission decisions in the emergency department: a focus group study among Israeli physicians.

Non-clinical factors influencing discharge and admission decisions in the emergency department: a focus group study among Israeli physicians.

Non-clinical factors influencing discharge and admission decisions in the emergency department: a focus group study among Israeli physicians.

Background: Emergency department (ED) physicians frequently make high-stakes decisions under time constraints. While clinical indicators are essential, non-clinical factors often shape whether a patient is admitted or discharged. However, the specific non-clinical influences and how physicians perceive them remain underexplored.

Objective: To identify and categorize non-clinical factors that influence admission decisions among ED physicians.

Methods: This qualitative study involved five focus groups with 42 participants (specialists, residents, and physician assistants) across five Israeli hospitals. A semi-structured discussion guide, informed by literature and expert interviews, was used. Audio-recordings were transcribed and analyzed thematically using a mixed inductive and deductive approach.

Results: Three overarching domains of non-clinical influences emerged: (1) patient-related factors (preferences, social support, functional status, access to care), (2) physician-related factors (experience, risk tolerance, workload, prior errors), and (3) system-level factors (bed capacity, ED protocols, communication gaps, resource availability). Physicians often weighed these elements alongside clinical indications for admission, particularly in borderline cases. Functional status and family support frequently influenced safe discharge decisions. Physician experience emerged as a buffer against risk-averse behaviors. System-level pressures, such as ED crowding and administrative policies, further shaped clinical discretion.

Conclusion: Non-clinical factors substantially influence ED disposition decisions. These findings highlight the need for policy reforms, decision-support tools, and further research to guide when and how non-clinical factors should inform care. This study offers a framework for understanding such influences and can inform interventions aimed at improving ED efficiency and patient outcomes.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信