Kamala P. Tamirisa MD , Javier E. Sanchez MD , Vincenzo Mirco La Fazia MD , Carola Gianni MD , Frans Serpa MD , Sanghamitra Mohanty MD , Amin Al-Ahmad MD , Andrea Natale MD
{"title":"脉冲场消融相关的血红蛋白尿和急性肾损伤:有效管理的见解和策略。","authors":"Kamala P. Tamirisa MD , Javier E. Sanchez MD , Vincenzo Mirco La Fazia MD , Carola Gianni MD , Frans Serpa MD , Sanghamitra Mohanty MD , Amin Al-Ahmad MD , Andrea Natale MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2025.07.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Pulsed field ablation has emerged as a novel technique for atrial fibrillation ablation, offering myocardial preferential ablation and safety advantages over traditional thermal energy methods. Complications such as hemolysis, hemoglobinuria, and acute kidney injury have been reported, particularly with high-energy delivery and excessive applications.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To understand the underlying mechanisms and potential preventative strategies, and identifying at-risk populations, to optimize procedural safety and ensure consistent outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This narrative review explores current data on mechanisms, incidence, clinical biomarkers, and risk factors that contribute to these issues.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>While transient and subclinical hemolysis is common, large scale registry data demonstrate that clinically significant hemolysis-induced renal complications remain rare, with fewer than 0.05% of patients requiring intervention. As catheter design and technology continue to evolve, further research with long-term data is crucial to continue to better understand and standardize mitigation strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This paper provides an evidence-based framework and practical strategies, individual patient assessment, and postprocedural management to address and support safer integration of pulsed field ablation into clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":"290 ","pages":"Pages 339-346"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pulsed field ablation-related hemoglobinuria and acute kidney injury: Insights and strategies for effective management\",\"authors\":\"Kamala P. Tamirisa MD , Javier E. Sanchez MD , Vincenzo Mirco La Fazia MD , Carola Gianni MD , Frans Serpa MD , Sanghamitra Mohanty MD , Amin Al-Ahmad MD , Andrea Natale MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ahj.2025.07.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Pulsed field ablation has emerged as a novel technique for atrial fibrillation ablation, offering myocardial preferential ablation and safety advantages over traditional thermal energy methods. Complications such as hemolysis, hemoglobinuria, and acute kidney injury have been reported, particularly with high-energy delivery and excessive applications.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To understand the underlying mechanisms and potential preventative strategies, and identifying at-risk populations, to optimize procedural safety and ensure consistent outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This narrative review explores current data on mechanisms, incidence, clinical biomarkers, and risk factors that contribute to these issues.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>While transient and subclinical hemolysis is common, large scale registry data demonstrate that clinically significant hemolysis-induced renal complications remain rare, with fewer than 0.05% of patients requiring intervention. As catheter design and technology continue to evolve, further research with long-term data is crucial to continue to better understand and standardize mitigation strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This paper provides an evidence-based framework and practical strategies, individual patient assessment, and postprocedural management to address and support safer integration of pulsed field ablation into clinical practice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American heart journal\",\"volume\":\"290 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 339-346\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American heart journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870325002224\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870325002224","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pulsed field ablation-related hemoglobinuria and acute kidney injury: Insights and strategies for effective management
Background
Pulsed field ablation has emerged as a novel technique for atrial fibrillation ablation, offering myocardial preferential ablation and safety advantages over traditional thermal energy methods. Complications such as hemolysis, hemoglobinuria, and acute kidney injury have been reported, particularly with high-energy delivery and excessive applications.
Objective
To understand the underlying mechanisms and potential preventative strategies, and identifying at-risk populations, to optimize procedural safety and ensure consistent outcomes.
Methods
This narrative review explores current data on mechanisms, incidence, clinical biomarkers, and risk factors that contribute to these issues.
Results
While transient and subclinical hemolysis is common, large scale registry data demonstrate that clinically significant hemolysis-induced renal complications remain rare, with fewer than 0.05% of patients requiring intervention. As catheter design and technology continue to evolve, further research with long-term data is crucial to continue to better understand and standardize mitigation strategies.
Conclusion
This paper provides an evidence-based framework and practical strategies, individual patient assessment, and postprocedural management to address and support safer integration of pulsed field ablation into clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
The American Heart Journal will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the broad discipline of cardiovascular disease. Our goal is to provide the reader primary investigation, scholarly review, and opinion concerning the practice of cardiovascular medicine. We especially encourage submission of 3 types of reports that are not frequently seen in cardiovascular journals: negative clinical studies, reports on study designs, and studies involving the organization of medical care. The Journal does not accept individual case reports or original articles involving bench laboratory or animal research.