Mary Christensen PhD, Stacey Culp PhD, John V. Campo MD, Jeffrey A. Bridge PhD, Lisa Horowitz PhD
{"title":"评估自杀筛查问题(ASQ)工具、患者健康问卷(PHQ)第9项、疼痛和阿片类药物筛查对农村成人初级保健患者自杀风险的影响","authors":"Mary Christensen PhD, Stacey Culp PhD, John V. Campo MD, Jeffrey A. Bridge PhD, Lisa Horowitz PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.70064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study evaluated psychometric properties of the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) and Item Nine of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ Item 9) to detect suicide risk in rural adult primary care and whether pain and opioid screening contributed to suicide risk detection.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A sample of adult rural primary care patients (<i>N</i> = 214) completed suicide risk, pain, and opioid screening measures electronically; 48% of participants also completed a follow-up survey. Using the Adult Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire (ASIQ) as the criterion measure, psychometric properties for the ASQ and the PHQ Item 9 were compared using McNemar's test for proportions. Bivariate and multivariable regression analyses explored associations between suicide risk, pain, opioid measures, and ASIQ results.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Approximately 4% (<i>N</i> = 8) of participants screened positive for suicide risk on the ASIQ relative to 11.7% (<i>N</i> = 25) on the ASQ and 3.7% (<i>N</i> = 8) on the PHQ Item 9. The ASQ had higher sensitivity (75.0%) than the PHQ Item 9 (50.0%); the difference was not statistically significant but may have clinical relevance. The PHQ Item 9 had significantly higher specificity (98.1%) than the full ASQ (91.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The ASQ, PHQ Item 9, depression scores, and LGBTQ+ status were significant predictors of ASIQ scores. Pain and opioid misuse were not.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Findings from this small sample provide preliminary support for the ASQ and PHQ Item 9 as suicide risk screens in rural adult primary care, but psychometric studies in larger samples are needed.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) tool, Item 9 of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ), pain, and opioid screening to detect suicide risk among rural adult primary care patients\",\"authors\":\"Mary Christensen PhD, Stacey Culp PhD, John V. Campo MD, Jeffrey A. Bridge PhD, Lisa Horowitz PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jrh.70064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study evaluated psychometric properties of the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) and Item Nine of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ Item 9) to detect suicide risk in rural adult primary care and whether pain and opioid screening contributed to suicide risk detection.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A sample of adult rural primary care patients (<i>N</i> = 214) completed suicide risk, pain, and opioid screening measures electronically; 48% of participants also completed a follow-up survey. Using the Adult Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire (ASIQ) as the criterion measure, psychometric properties for the ASQ and the PHQ Item 9 were compared using McNemar's test for proportions. Bivariate and multivariable regression analyses explored associations between suicide risk, pain, opioid measures, and ASIQ results.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>Approximately 4% (<i>N</i> = 8) of participants screened positive for suicide risk on the ASIQ relative to 11.7% (<i>N</i> = 25) on the ASQ and 3.7% (<i>N</i> = 8) on the PHQ Item 9. The ASQ had higher sensitivity (75.0%) than the PHQ Item 9 (50.0%); the difference was not statistically significant but may have clinical relevance. The PHQ Item 9 had significantly higher specificity (98.1%) than the full ASQ (91.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The ASQ, PHQ Item 9, depression scores, and LGBTQ+ status were significant predictors of ASIQ scores. Pain and opioid misuse were not.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Findings from this small sample provide preliminary support for the ASQ and PHQ Item 9 as suicide risk screens in rural adult primary care, but psychometric studies in larger samples are needed.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"volume\":\"41 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.70064\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.70064","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) tool, Item 9 of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ), pain, and opioid screening to detect suicide risk among rural adult primary care patients
Purpose
This study evaluated psychometric properties of the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) and Item Nine of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ Item 9) to detect suicide risk in rural adult primary care and whether pain and opioid screening contributed to suicide risk detection.
Methods
A sample of adult rural primary care patients (N = 214) completed suicide risk, pain, and opioid screening measures electronically; 48% of participants also completed a follow-up survey. Using the Adult Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire (ASIQ) as the criterion measure, psychometric properties for the ASQ and the PHQ Item 9 were compared using McNemar's test for proportions. Bivariate and multivariable regression analyses explored associations between suicide risk, pain, opioid measures, and ASIQ results.
Findings
Approximately 4% (N = 8) of participants screened positive for suicide risk on the ASIQ relative to 11.7% (N = 25) on the ASQ and 3.7% (N = 8) on the PHQ Item 9. The ASQ had higher sensitivity (75.0%) than the PHQ Item 9 (50.0%); the difference was not statistically significant but may have clinical relevance. The PHQ Item 9 had significantly higher specificity (98.1%) than the full ASQ (91.0%, p < 0.001). The ASQ, PHQ Item 9, depression scores, and LGBTQ+ status were significant predictors of ASIQ scores. Pain and opioid misuse were not.
Conclusions
Findings from this small sample provide preliminary support for the ASQ and PHQ Item 9 as suicide risk screens in rural adult primary care, but psychometric studies in larger samples are needed.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.