评估自杀筛查问题(ASQ)工具、患者健康问卷(PHQ)第9项、疼痛和阿片类药物筛查对农村成人初级保健患者自杀风险的影响

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Mary Christensen PhD, Stacey Culp PhD, John V. Campo MD, Jeffrey A. Bridge PhD, Lisa Horowitz PhD
{"title":"评估自杀筛查问题(ASQ)工具、患者健康问卷(PHQ)第9项、疼痛和阿片类药物筛查对农村成人初级保健患者自杀风险的影响","authors":"Mary Christensen PhD,&nbsp;Stacey Culp PhD,&nbsp;John V. Campo MD,&nbsp;Jeffrey A. Bridge PhD,&nbsp;Lisa Horowitz PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.70064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study evaluated psychometric properties of the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) and Item Nine of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ Item 9) to detect suicide risk in rural adult primary care and whether pain and opioid screening contributed to suicide risk detection.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A sample of adult rural primary care patients (<i>N</i> = 214) completed suicide risk, pain, and opioid screening measures electronically; 48% of participants also completed a follow-up survey. Using the Adult Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire (ASIQ) as the criterion measure, psychometric properties for the ASQ and the PHQ Item 9 were compared using McNemar's test for proportions. Bivariate and multivariable regression analyses explored associations between suicide risk, pain, opioid measures, and ASIQ results.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Approximately 4% (<i>N</i> = 8) of participants screened positive for suicide risk on the ASIQ relative to 11.7% (<i>N</i> = 25) on the ASQ and 3.7% (<i>N</i> = 8) on the PHQ Item 9. The ASQ had higher sensitivity (75.0%) than the PHQ Item 9 (50.0%); the difference was not statistically significant but may have clinical relevance. The PHQ Item 9 had significantly higher specificity (98.1%) than the full ASQ (91.0%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The ASQ, PHQ Item 9, depression scores, and LGBTQ+ status were significant predictors of ASIQ scores. Pain and opioid misuse were not.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Findings from this small sample provide preliminary support for the ASQ and PHQ Item 9 as suicide risk screens in rural adult primary care, but psychometric studies in larger samples are needed.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) tool, Item 9 of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ), pain, and opioid screening to detect suicide risk among rural adult primary care patients\",\"authors\":\"Mary Christensen PhD,&nbsp;Stacey Culp PhD,&nbsp;John V. Campo MD,&nbsp;Jeffrey A. Bridge PhD,&nbsp;Lisa Horowitz PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jrh.70064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study evaluated psychometric properties of the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) and Item Nine of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ Item 9) to detect suicide risk in rural adult primary care and whether pain and opioid screening contributed to suicide risk detection.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A sample of adult rural primary care patients (<i>N</i> = 214) completed suicide risk, pain, and opioid screening measures electronically; 48% of participants also completed a follow-up survey. Using the Adult Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire (ASIQ) as the criterion measure, psychometric properties for the ASQ and the PHQ Item 9 were compared using McNemar's test for proportions. Bivariate and multivariable regression analyses explored associations between suicide risk, pain, opioid measures, and ASIQ results.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>Approximately 4% (<i>N</i> = 8) of participants screened positive for suicide risk on the ASIQ relative to 11.7% (<i>N</i> = 25) on the ASQ and 3.7% (<i>N</i> = 8) on the PHQ Item 9. The ASQ had higher sensitivity (75.0%) than the PHQ Item 9 (50.0%); the difference was not statistically significant but may have clinical relevance. The PHQ Item 9 had significantly higher specificity (98.1%) than the full ASQ (91.0%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The ASQ, PHQ Item 9, depression scores, and LGBTQ+ status were significant predictors of ASIQ scores. Pain and opioid misuse were not.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Findings from this small sample provide preliminary support for the ASQ and PHQ Item 9 as suicide risk screens in rural adult primary care, but psychometric studies in larger samples are needed.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"volume\":\"41 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.70064\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.70064","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究评估自杀筛查问题(Ask - screening Questions, ASQ)和患者健康问卷(Patient Health Questionnaire, PHQ Item 9)第九项的心理测量特性,以检测农村成人初级保健的自杀风险,以及疼痛和阿片类药物筛查是否有助于自杀风险检测。方法选取214例农村成人初级保健患者,通过电子方式完成自杀风险、疼痛和阿片类药物筛查;48%的参与者还完成了一项后续调查。以成人自杀意念问卷(ASIQ)为标准量表,采用McNemar比例检验对ASQ和PHQ第9项的心理测量特性进行比较。双变量和多变量回归分析探讨了自杀风险、疼痛、阿片类药物测量和ASIQ结果之间的关系。研究结果:大约4% (N = 8)的参与者在ASQ上筛选出自杀风险阳性,而在ASQ上筛选出11.7% (N = 25)的参与者和在PHQ项目9上筛选出3.7% (N = 8)的参与者。ASQ的灵敏度(75.0%)高于PHQ第9项(50.0%);差异无统计学意义,但可能具有临床相关性。PHQ项目9的特异性(98.1%)显著高于全ASQ (91.0%, p <;0.001)。ASQ、PHQ项目9、抑郁得分和LGBTQ+状态是ASQ得分的显著预测因子。疼痛和阿片类药物滥用则没有。结论本研究结果为ASQ和PHQ第9项作为农村成人初级保健自杀风险筛查提供了初步支持,但需要在更大样本中进行心理测量学研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) tool, Item 9 of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ), pain, and opioid screening to detect suicide risk among rural adult primary care patients

Purpose

This study evaluated psychometric properties of the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) and Item Nine of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ Item 9) to detect suicide risk in rural adult primary care and whether pain and opioid screening contributed to suicide risk detection.

Methods

A sample of adult rural primary care patients (N = 214) completed suicide risk, pain, and opioid screening measures electronically; 48% of participants also completed a follow-up survey. Using the Adult Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire (ASIQ) as the criterion measure, psychometric properties for the ASQ and the PHQ Item 9 were compared using McNemar's test for proportions. Bivariate and multivariable regression analyses explored associations between suicide risk, pain, opioid measures, and ASIQ results.

Findings

Approximately 4% (N = 8) of participants screened positive for suicide risk on the ASIQ relative to 11.7% (N = 25) on the ASQ and 3.7% (N = 8) on the PHQ Item 9. The ASQ had higher sensitivity (75.0%) than the PHQ Item 9 (50.0%); the difference was not statistically significant but may have clinical relevance. The PHQ Item 9 had significantly higher specificity (98.1%) than the full ASQ (91.0%, p < 0.001). The ASQ, PHQ Item 9, depression scores, and LGBTQ+ status were significant predictors of ASIQ scores. Pain and opioid misuse were not.

Conclusions

Findings from this small sample provide preliminary support for the ASQ and PHQ Item 9 as suicide risk screens in rural adult primary care, but psychometric studies in larger samples are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信