《联合国残疾人权利公约》批准国家中支持沟通障碍者的沟通渠道和沟通差异:综合审查

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Áine Kearns, Caroline Jagoe, Rachael Stockdale, Dorothy Clarke, Molly Manning, Ruth Mc Menamin, Yvonne Fitzmaurice, James Green, Orla Duffy, Helen Kelly
{"title":"《联合国残疾人权利公约》批准国家中支持沟通障碍者的沟通渠道和沟通差异:综合审查","authors":"Áine Kearns,&nbsp;Caroline Jagoe,&nbsp;Rachael Stockdale,&nbsp;Dorothy Clarke,&nbsp;Molly Manning,&nbsp;Ruth Mc Menamin,&nbsp;Yvonne Fitzmaurice,&nbsp;James Green,&nbsp;Orla Duffy,&nbsp;Helen Kelly","doi":"10.1111/1460-6984.70098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) recognizes communication accessibility as a fundamental human right. Communication plays a key role in facilitating belonging, sharing and engaging with communities, allowing individuals to connect and forge relationships. Communication is fundamental to well-being and building a sense of self and identity, as well as establishing and maintaining social roles and vocation. Those with communication disabilities or differences can face many barriers to social participation, inclusion and potential financial implications.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>This integrative review explores policy, practices and guidelines that support communication access of adults with communication disabilities and differences in selected English-speaking countries with UNCRPD-ratified status and well-established speech and language therapy services.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>An integrative review of the literature was undertaken. A systematic search of the published, peer-reviewed literature was conducted for empirical research, and a manual search was undertaken to obtain policy, practice, or guidelines, to support communication access at a sectoral/service or community level. A multi-scalar approach situates the findings within several contexts: international law, national legislation and policy, professional guidelines and evidence from local/national projects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Contributions</h3>\n \n <p>A multi-scalar map was developed that positions the findings on communication access within the included countries (Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand), across local/national programmes and projects (<i>n</i> = 11), professional body and civil society guidance, regional/national legislation and policy specific to communication access and finally the international normative instrument of the UNCRPD. The findings indicate that communication accessibility is recognised as a fundamental human right, but signatory states are required to take appropriate measures to ensure access to information and communication for persons with disabilities. National legislation, policy and practice need further scrutiny in this regard.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This review examines the complex phenomenon of communication access for people with communication disabilities and differences. The findings of this review can inform and shape practice with regard to communication accessibility as well as support advocacy efforts and future research in this area.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS</h3>\n \n <div><i>What is already known on the subject</i>\n \n <ul>\n \n <li>Communication accessibility is a fundamental human right. It can be characterized by the respectful and responsive treatment of individuals with communication disabilities and differences, along with the implementation of strategies and resources and the adaptation of environments, process and systems to facilitate effective communication.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n <div><i>What this paper adds to existing knowledge</i>\n \n <ul>\n \n <li>A multi-scalar map was developed that situates the findings on communication access within the included countries (Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand), across local/national programmes and projects (n = 11), professional body and civil society guidance, regional/national legislation and policies specific to communication access, and finally the international normative instrument of the UNCRPD. There is a lack of a shared understanding of communication access within empirical research, policy and local and national guidelines across the included countries. In addition, the focus on the right to communication is addressed more explicitly in some groups (and country contexts) than others.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n <div><i>What are the practical and clinical implications of this work?</i>\n \n <ul>\n \n <li>This review highlights how multimodal communication is important for accessible communication. Co-design can also be harnessed to enhance communication access. The review provides an integrated set of data (empirical research, policy and guidelines) that can be used in future research, practice development and advocacy.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49182,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","volume":"60 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1460-6984.70098","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supporting Communication Access of People With Communication Disabilities and Communication Differences in UNCRPD-Ratified Countries: An Integrative Review\",\"authors\":\"Áine Kearns,&nbsp;Caroline Jagoe,&nbsp;Rachael Stockdale,&nbsp;Dorothy Clarke,&nbsp;Molly Manning,&nbsp;Ruth Mc Menamin,&nbsp;Yvonne Fitzmaurice,&nbsp;James Green,&nbsp;Orla Duffy,&nbsp;Helen Kelly\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1460-6984.70098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) recognizes communication accessibility as a fundamental human right. Communication plays a key role in facilitating belonging, sharing and engaging with communities, allowing individuals to connect and forge relationships. Communication is fundamental to well-being and building a sense of self and identity, as well as establishing and maintaining social roles and vocation. Those with communication disabilities or differences can face many barriers to social participation, inclusion and potential financial implications.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>This integrative review explores policy, practices and guidelines that support communication access of adults with communication disabilities and differences in selected English-speaking countries with UNCRPD-ratified status and well-established speech and language therapy services.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>An integrative review of the literature was undertaken. A systematic search of the published, peer-reviewed literature was conducted for empirical research, and a manual search was undertaken to obtain policy, practice, or guidelines, to support communication access at a sectoral/service or community level. A multi-scalar approach situates the findings within several contexts: international law, national legislation and policy, professional guidelines and evidence from local/national projects.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Contributions</h3>\\n \\n <p>A multi-scalar map was developed that positions the findings on communication access within the included countries (Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand), across local/national programmes and projects (<i>n</i> = 11), professional body and civil society guidance, regional/national legislation and policy specific to communication access and finally the international normative instrument of the UNCRPD. The findings indicate that communication accessibility is recognised as a fundamental human right, but signatory states are required to take appropriate measures to ensure access to information and communication for persons with disabilities. National legislation, policy and practice need further scrutiny in this regard.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>This review examines the complex phenomenon of communication access for people with communication disabilities and differences. The findings of this review can inform and shape practice with regard to communication accessibility as well as support advocacy efforts and future research in this area.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS</h3>\\n \\n <div><i>What is already known on the subject</i>\\n \\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>Communication accessibility is a fundamental human right. It can be characterized by the respectful and responsive treatment of individuals with communication disabilities and differences, along with the implementation of strategies and resources and the adaptation of environments, process and systems to facilitate effective communication.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n <div><i>What this paper adds to existing knowledge</i>\\n \\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>A multi-scalar map was developed that situates the findings on communication access within the included countries (Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand), across local/national programmes and projects (n = 11), professional body and civil society guidance, regional/national legislation and policies specific to communication access, and finally the international normative instrument of the UNCRPD. There is a lack of a shared understanding of communication access within empirical research, policy and local and national guidelines across the included countries. In addition, the focus on the right to communication is addressed more explicitly in some groups (and country contexts) than others.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n <div><i>What are the practical and clinical implications of this work?</i>\\n \\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>This review highlights how multimodal communication is important for accessible communication. Co-design can also be harnessed to enhance communication access. The review provides an integrated set of data (empirical research, policy and guidelines) that can be used in future research, practice development and advocacy.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders\",\"volume\":\"60 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1460-6984.70098\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1460-6984.70098\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1460-6984.70098","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《联合国残疾人权利公约》(UNCRPD)承认无障碍通信是一项基本人权。沟通在促进归属感、分享和参与社区方面发挥着关键作用,使个人能够建立联系和建立关系。沟通是幸福和建立自我意识和身份的基础,也是建立和维持社会角色和职业的基础。那些有沟通障碍或差异的人在参与社会、融入社会和潜在的经济影响方面可能面临许多障碍。本综合综述探讨了支持沟通障碍成人交流的政策、实践和指南,以及选定的具有联合国残疾人权利公约批准地位和完善的言语和语言治疗服务的英语国家的差异。方法对相关文献进行综合复习。为进行实证研究,对已发表的同行评议文献进行了系统检索,并进行了人工检索,以获得政策、实践或指导方针,以支持部门/服务或社区一级的通信获取。多尺度方法将调查结果置于若干背景下:国际法、国家立法和政策、专业准则和来自地方/国家项目的证据。绘制了一幅多标量图,将关于通信获取的调查结果定位于所包括的国家(爱尔兰共和国、北爱尔兰、联合王国、加拿大、澳大利亚和新西兰)、地方/国家方案和项目(n = 11)、专业机构和民间社会指导、专门针对通信获取的区域/国家立法和政策,最后是《残疾人权利公约》的国际规范性文书。调查结果表明,无障碍沟通被认为是一项基本人权,但签署国需要采取适当措施,确保残疾人获得信息和沟通。在这方面需要进一步审查国家立法、政策和做法。结论本研究探讨了沟通障碍人士的沟通渠道的复杂现象及其差异。本综述的结果可以为沟通无障碍方面的实践提供信息和指导,并支持该领域的宣传工作和未来的研究。交流无障碍是一项基本人权。它的特点是尊重和积极地对待有沟通障碍和差异的个人,同时实施战略和资源,并适应环境、程序和制度,以促进有效的沟通。我们绘制了一张多标量地图,将有关通信获取的调查结果置于所包括的国家(爱尔兰共和国、北爱尔兰、英国、加拿大、澳大利亚和新西兰)、地方/国家计划和项目(n = 11)、专业机构和民间社会指导、区域/国家立法和政策,具体到获取信息,最后是《残疾人权利公约》的国际规范性文书。在所包括的国家中,在实证研究、政策以及地方和国家指导方针中缺乏对信息获取的共同理解。此外,在某些群体(和国家背景)中,对传播权的关注比其他群体更明确。这项工作的实际和临床意义是什么?这篇综述强调了多模式通信对无障碍通信的重要性。协同设计还可以用于增强通信访问。该综述提供了一套完整的数据(实证研究、政策和指导方针),可用于未来的研究、实践发展和宣传。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Supporting Communication Access of People With Communication Disabilities and Communication Differences in UNCRPD-Ratified Countries: An Integrative Review

Supporting Communication Access of People With Communication Disabilities and Communication Differences in UNCRPD-Ratified Countries: An Integrative Review

Background

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) recognizes communication accessibility as a fundamental human right. Communication plays a key role in facilitating belonging, sharing and engaging with communities, allowing individuals to connect and forge relationships. Communication is fundamental to well-being and building a sense of self and identity, as well as establishing and maintaining social roles and vocation. Those with communication disabilities or differences can face many barriers to social participation, inclusion and potential financial implications.

Aims

This integrative review explores policy, practices and guidelines that support communication access of adults with communication disabilities and differences in selected English-speaking countries with UNCRPD-ratified status and well-established speech and language therapy services.

Methods

An integrative review of the literature was undertaken. A systematic search of the published, peer-reviewed literature was conducted for empirical research, and a manual search was undertaken to obtain policy, practice, or guidelines, to support communication access at a sectoral/service or community level. A multi-scalar approach situates the findings within several contexts: international law, national legislation and policy, professional guidelines and evidence from local/national projects.

Main Contributions

A multi-scalar map was developed that positions the findings on communication access within the included countries (Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand), across local/national programmes and projects (n = 11), professional body and civil society guidance, regional/national legislation and policy specific to communication access and finally the international normative instrument of the UNCRPD. The findings indicate that communication accessibility is recognised as a fundamental human right, but signatory states are required to take appropriate measures to ensure access to information and communication for persons with disabilities. National legislation, policy and practice need further scrutiny in this regard.

Conclusions

This review examines the complex phenomenon of communication access for people with communication disabilities and differences. The findings of this review can inform and shape practice with regard to communication accessibility as well as support advocacy efforts and future research in this area.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on the subject
  • Communication accessibility is a fundamental human right. It can be characterized by the respectful and responsive treatment of individuals with communication disabilities and differences, along with the implementation of strategies and resources and the adaptation of environments, process and systems to facilitate effective communication.
What this paper adds to existing knowledge
  • A multi-scalar map was developed that situates the findings on communication access within the included countries (Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand), across local/national programmes and projects (n = 11), professional body and civil society guidance, regional/national legislation and policies specific to communication access, and finally the international normative instrument of the UNCRPD. There is a lack of a shared understanding of communication access within empirical research, policy and local and national guidelines across the included countries. In addition, the focus on the right to communication is addressed more explicitly in some groups (and country contexts) than others.
What are the practical and clinical implications of this work?
  • This review highlights how multimodal communication is important for accessible communication. Co-design can also be harnessed to enhance communication access. The review provides an integrated set of data (empirical research, policy and guidelines) that can be used in future research, practice development and advocacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (IJLCD) is the official journal of the Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists. The Journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of speech, language, communication disorders and speech and language therapy. It provides a forum for the exchange of information and discussion of issues of clinical or theoretical relevance in the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信