手术在系统性硬化症食管受累中的作用:系统文献综述

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Pietro Matucci-Cerinic , Akpabio Akpabio , Michael Hughes , Jan W. Schoones , Zsuzsanna H. McMahan , Massimo Vecchiato , Antonio Martino , Roberto Petri , Giovanni Terrosu , Marco Matucci-Cerinic , Alessia Alunno
{"title":"手术在系统性硬化症食管受累中的作用:系统文献综述","authors":"Pietro Matucci-Cerinic ,&nbsp;Akpabio Akpabio ,&nbsp;Michael Hughes ,&nbsp;Jan W. Schoones ,&nbsp;Zsuzsanna H. McMahan ,&nbsp;Massimo Vecchiato ,&nbsp;Antonio Martino ,&nbsp;Roberto Petri ,&nbsp;Giovanni Terrosu ,&nbsp;Marco Matucci-Cerinic ,&nbsp;Alessia Alunno","doi":"10.1016/j.semarthrit.2025.152791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the earliest clinical manifestations of systemic sclerosis (SSc). Proton pump inhibitors are ineffective in controlling symptoms in up to 40 % of cases, and their chronic use (often) at high-doses and long-term safety are a concern. For this reason, surgery has been proposed as an alternative management strategy for refractory GERD in SSc patients. However, consensus on the optimal surgical procedure, timing, and ideal patient population, is still lacking.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate and compare the safety, efficacy, indications, timing and feasibility of different surgical approaches to fundoplication (FP) for treating SSc-related refractory GERD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Four research questions based on the PICO framework were developed to guide the systematic literature review (SLR) which was completed 01 September 2024. The search was performed across different databases including PubMed, MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Emcare and Academic Search Premier. References were independently screened by two reviewers who also independently assessed the full text of eligible articles and extracted data. Due to the heterogeneity of retrieved studies, narrative summaries were used to present the data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 986 retrieved papers, 23 were eligible for inclusion. In these studies, 184 SSc patients had an anti-reflux surgical procedure and were included in the analysis. Most of the studies were conducted in surgical settings and relevant rheumatological data were largely missing. Refractory GERD symptoms were the most common indication for surgery, with post-operative dysphagia being the most frequent complication. In 14 studies, FP was effective in reducing the GERD symptoms, 1 study had indeterminate findings while in 4 studies, unfavourable results for FP were reported. All the included studies reported a low mortality and morbidity rate related to surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our data demonstrate that the surgical management of refractory GERD remains a challenge due to the limited evidence, which is largely of poor quality. However, the safety and beneficial effect of FP obtained in the majority of SSc patients, suggests that it may be a beneficial intervention in some patients. The definition of minimal requirements to perform surgical studies on refractory GERD, identifying a specific SSc subset of patients that would most likely benefit from FP, and determining the optimal timing for surgery are warranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21715,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 152791"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of surgery in esophageal involvement in systemic sclerosis: A systematic literature review\",\"authors\":\"Pietro Matucci-Cerinic ,&nbsp;Akpabio Akpabio ,&nbsp;Michael Hughes ,&nbsp;Jan W. Schoones ,&nbsp;Zsuzsanna H. McMahan ,&nbsp;Massimo Vecchiato ,&nbsp;Antonio Martino ,&nbsp;Roberto Petri ,&nbsp;Giovanni Terrosu ,&nbsp;Marco Matucci-Cerinic ,&nbsp;Alessia Alunno\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.semarthrit.2025.152791\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the earliest clinical manifestations of systemic sclerosis (SSc). Proton pump inhibitors are ineffective in controlling symptoms in up to 40 % of cases, and their chronic use (often) at high-doses and long-term safety are a concern. For this reason, surgery has been proposed as an alternative management strategy for refractory GERD in SSc patients. However, consensus on the optimal surgical procedure, timing, and ideal patient population, is still lacking.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate and compare the safety, efficacy, indications, timing and feasibility of different surgical approaches to fundoplication (FP) for treating SSc-related refractory GERD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Four research questions based on the PICO framework were developed to guide the systematic literature review (SLR) which was completed 01 September 2024. The search was performed across different databases including PubMed, MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Emcare and Academic Search Premier. References were independently screened by two reviewers who also independently assessed the full text of eligible articles and extracted data. Due to the heterogeneity of retrieved studies, narrative summaries were used to present the data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 986 retrieved papers, 23 were eligible for inclusion. In these studies, 184 SSc patients had an anti-reflux surgical procedure and were included in the analysis. Most of the studies were conducted in surgical settings and relevant rheumatological data were largely missing. Refractory GERD symptoms were the most common indication for surgery, with post-operative dysphagia being the most frequent complication. In 14 studies, FP was effective in reducing the GERD symptoms, 1 study had indeterminate findings while in 4 studies, unfavourable results for FP were reported. All the included studies reported a low mortality and morbidity rate related to surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our data demonstrate that the surgical management of refractory GERD remains a challenge due to the limited evidence, which is largely of poor quality. However, the safety and beneficial effect of FP obtained in the majority of SSc patients, suggests that it may be a beneficial intervention in some patients. The definition of minimal requirements to perform surgical studies on refractory GERD, identifying a specific SSc subset of patients that would most likely benefit from FP, and determining the optimal timing for surgery are warranted.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism\",\"volume\":\"74 \",\"pages\":\"Article 152791\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049017225001623\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049017225001623","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景胃食管反流病(GERD)是系统性硬化症(SSc)的早期临床表现之一。在高达40%的病例中,质子泵抑制剂在控制症状方面是无效的,并且它们的长期(通常)高剂量使用和长期安全性是一个问题。因此,手术被认为是难治性胃食管反流患者的另一种治疗策略。然而,关于最佳手术程序、时机和理想患者群体的共识仍然缺乏。目的评价和比较不同手术入路(FP)治疗ssc相关难治性胃食管反流的安全性、有效性、适应证、时机和可行性。方法基于PICO框架制定4个研究问题,指导2024年9月1日完成的系统性文献综述(SLR)。检索在不同的数据库中进行,包括PubMed、MEDLINE (OVID)、EMBASE、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、谷歌Scholar、Emcare和Academic search Premier。参考文献由两位审稿人独立筛选,他们也独立评估了符合条件的文章的全文并提取了数据。由于检索研究的异质性,采用叙述性摘要来呈现数据。结果986篇检索论文中,23篇符合纳入标准。在这些研究中,184例SSc患者接受了抗反流手术,并被纳入分析。大多数研究是在外科环境下进行的,相关的风湿病学数据在很大程度上缺失。难治性胃食管反流症状是最常见的手术指征,术后吞咽困难是最常见的并发症。在14项研究中,FP可有效减轻胃食管反流症状,1项研究结果不确定,而4项研究报告了FP的不利结果。所有纳入的研究都报告了与手术相关的低死亡率和发病率。结论我们的数据表明,由于证据有限,且质量较差,难治性胃食管反流的手术治疗仍然是一个挑战。然而,FP在大多数SSc患者中获得的安全性和有益效果表明,它可能是一种有益的干预措施。对难治性胃食管反流进行手术研究的最低要求的定义,确定最有可能从FP中获益的特定SSc患者亚群,以及确定最佳手术时机是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of surgery in esophageal involvement in systemic sclerosis: A systematic literature review

Background

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the earliest clinical manifestations of systemic sclerosis (SSc). Proton pump inhibitors are ineffective in controlling symptoms in up to 40 % of cases, and their chronic use (often) at high-doses and long-term safety are a concern. For this reason, surgery has been proposed as an alternative management strategy for refractory GERD in SSc patients. However, consensus on the optimal surgical procedure, timing, and ideal patient population, is still lacking.

Objectives

To evaluate and compare the safety, efficacy, indications, timing and feasibility of different surgical approaches to fundoplication (FP) for treating SSc-related refractory GERD.

Methods

Four research questions based on the PICO framework were developed to guide the systematic literature review (SLR) which was completed 01 September 2024. The search was performed across different databases including PubMed, MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Emcare and Academic Search Premier. References were independently screened by two reviewers who also independently assessed the full text of eligible articles and extracted data. Due to the heterogeneity of retrieved studies, narrative summaries were used to present the data.

Results

Of the 986 retrieved papers, 23 were eligible for inclusion. In these studies, 184 SSc patients had an anti-reflux surgical procedure and were included in the analysis. Most of the studies were conducted in surgical settings and relevant rheumatological data were largely missing. Refractory GERD symptoms were the most common indication for surgery, with post-operative dysphagia being the most frequent complication. In 14 studies, FP was effective in reducing the GERD symptoms, 1 study had indeterminate findings while in 4 studies, unfavourable results for FP were reported. All the included studies reported a low mortality and morbidity rate related to surgery.

Conclusions

Our data demonstrate that the surgical management of refractory GERD remains a challenge due to the limited evidence, which is largely of poor quality. However, the safety and beneficial effect of FP obtained in the majority of SSc patients, suggests that it may be a beneficial intervention in some patients. The definition of minimal requirements to perform surgical studies on refractory GERD, identifying a specific SSc subset of patients that would most likely benefit from FP, and determining the optimal timing for surgery are warranted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism provides access to the highest-quality clinical, therapeutic and translational research about arthritis, rheumatology and musculoskeletal disorders that affect the joints and connective tissue. Each bimonthly issue includes articles giving you the latest diagnostic criteria, consensus statements, systematic reviews and meta-analyses as well as clinical and translational research studies. Read this journal for the latest groundbreaking research and to gain insights from scientists and clinicians on the management and treatment of musculoskeletal and autoimmune rheumatologic diseases. The journal is of interest to rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons, internal medicine physicians, immunologists and specialists in bone and mineral metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信