{"title":"微创手术后最佳端口皮肤闭合方法:随机临床试验的系统回顾和网络荟萃分析","authors":"E.P. Kerin , M.G. Davey , L. Bouz Mkabaah , N.E. Donlon","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>For minimally-invasive surgery (MIS), there are numerous acceptable port-site closure techniques with no consensus on the method used.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To identify optimal port site postoperative wound closure method following MIS with respect to complication rates and cosmetic outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed in accordance with PRISMA-NMA guidelines for RCTs comparing at least two methods of port-site closure.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nineteen RCTs were identified evaluating eight methods of wound closure in 1,932 patients; across three types of suture, three forms of tissue glue, staples and paper-tape. At NMA, there was no significant difference in wound complication, infection, dehiscence or pain rate irrespective of closure method, albeit a trend towards higher rate of dehiscence for adhesives. At NMA, wound cosmesis was superior for adhesives at both early and late postoperative follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study validates the use of tissue adhesives with respect to primary closure of port sites following MIS while highlighting potential associated risks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"248 ","pages":"Article 116542"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal port site skin closure method following minimally-invasive surgery: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials\",\"authors\":\"E.P. Kerin , M.G. Davey , L. Bouz Mkabaah , N.E. Donlon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>For minimally-invasive surgery (MIS), there are numerous acceptable port-site closure techniques with no consensus on the method used.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To identify optimal port site postoperative wound closure method following MIS with respect to complication rates and cosmetic outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed in accordance with PRISMA-NMA guidelines for RCTs comparing at least two methods of port-site closure.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nineteen RCTs were identified evaluating eight methods of wound closure in 1,932 patients; across three types of suture, three forms of tissue glue, staples and paper-tape. At NMA, there was no significant difference in wound complication, infection, dehiscence or pain rate irrespective of closure method, albeit a trend towards higher rate of dehiscence for adhesives. At NMA, wound cosmesis was superior for adhesives at both early and late postoperative follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study validates the use of tissue adhesives with respect to primary closure of port sites following MIS while highlighting potential associated risks.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\"248 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116542\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961025003654\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961025003654","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimal port site skin closure method following minimally-invasive surgery: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials
Background
For minimally-invasive surgery (MIS), there are numerous acceptable port-site closure techniques with no consensus on the method used.
Aim
To identify optimal port site postoperative wound closure method following MIS with respect to complication rates and cosmetic outcome.
Methods
Network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed in accordance with PRISMA-NMA guidelines for RCTs comparing at least two methods of port-site closure.
Results
Nineteen RCTs were identified evaluating eight methods of wound closure in 1,932 patients; across three types of suture, three forms of tissue glue, staples and paper-tape. At NMA, there was no significant difference in wound complication, infection, dehiscence or pain rate irrespective of closure method, albeit a trend towards higher rate of dehiscence for adhesives. At NMA, wound cosmesis was superior for adhesives at both early and late postoperative follow-up.
Conclusion
This study validates the use of tissue adhesives with respect to primary closure of port sites following MIS while highlighting potential associated risks.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.