球窝式颈椎间盘置换术的定性和定量检索分析

IF 2.5 Q3 Medicine
Jenna M. Wahbeh MS , Sophia N. Sangiorgio PhD , Sang-Hyun Park PhD , G. Bryan Cornwall PhD , Neha V. Kulkarni BS , Roberto Chiesa PhD , Edward Ebramzadeh PhD
{"title":"球窝式颈椎间盘置换术的定性和定量检索分析","authors":"Jenna M. Wahbeh MS ,&nbsp;Sophia N. Sangiorgio PhD ,&nbsp;Sang-Hyun Park PhD ,&nbsp;G. Bryan Cornwall PhD ,&nbsp;Neha V. Kulkarni BS ,&nbsp;Roberto Chiesa PhD ,&nbsp;Edward Ebramzadeh PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Porous Coated Motion (PCM) is a ball-and-socket cervical disc replacement with excellent reported short-term clinical outcome. However, longer-term studies identified migration as a common cause of implant removal and the device was withdrawn from the market. Given these discrepancies, retrieval analyses are crucial to assess whether preclinical testing accurately predicts clinical performance. This study aimed to quantitatively and qualitatively analyze retrieved PCM devices to identify primary reasons for removal and assess the impact of observed damage on overall device fixation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Thirty-seven PCM devices were received for postmarket surveillance. Nondestructive analysis included visual examination, photographic documentation, and radiographic review. Analytical measurements were performed using a coordinate measuring machine to assess articulating surfaces or a digital microscope for endplate surface feature characterization. Oxidation analysis was performed on all devices with adequate handling and storage conditions, and histopathology was performed when tissue samples were available.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-five devices met the inclusion criteria for this study. The mean patient age at retrieval was 45.3±13.5 years, with an average time-in-vivo of 121±15.6 days. Anterior migration was the most common reason for removal, reported in 17 cases, with the inferior convex polyethylene component predominately migrating. Additionally, 17 devices had a focalized deviation on the posterior quadrant of the articulating polyethylene ball, 11 of which had evidence of radiographic clinical migration. Histopathology and metrology findings indicated that wear debris did not contribute to clinical failure.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings of the present study, specifically the minimal bony ongrowth, lack of extraction damage, and radiographic imaging, indicated that most devices were removed due to migration. Metrology analysis revealed a depression on the posterior edge of the inferior endplate polyethylene ball, which correlated with anterior slippage. This may be a distinctive feature of the PCM’s relatively large ball-and-socket design that led to increased stress during extension, causing anterior migration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34622,"journal":{"name":"North American Spine Society Journal","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100768"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Qualitative and quantitative retrieval analysis of a ball-and-socket cervical disc replacement\",\"authors\":\"Jenna M. Wahbeh MS ,&nbsp;Sophia N. Sangiorgio PhD ,&nbsp;Sang-Hyun Park PhD ,&nbsp;G. Bryan Cornwall PhD ,&nbsp;Neha V. Kulkarni BS ,&nbsp;Roberto Chiesa PhD ,&nbsp;Edward Ebramzadeh PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100768\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Porous Coated Motion (PCM) is a ball-and-socket cervical disc replacement with excellent reported short-term clinical outcome. However, longer-term studies identified migration as a common cause of implant removal and the device was withdrawn from the market. Given these discrepancies, retrieval analyses are crucial to assess whether preclinical testing accurately predicts clinical performance. This study aimed to quantitatively and qualitatively analyze retrieved PCM devices to identify primary reasons for removal and assess the impact of observed damage on overall device fixation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Thirty-seven PCM devices were received for postmarket surveillance. Nondestructive analysis included visual examination, photographic documentation, and radiographic review. Analytical measurements were performed using a coordinate measuring machine to assess articulating surfaces or a digital microscope for endplate surface feature characterization. Oxidation analysis was performed on all devices with adequate handling and storage conditions, and histopathology was performed when tissue samples were available.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-five devices met the inclusion criteria for this study. The mean patient age at retrieval was 45.3±13.5 years, with an average time-in-vivo of 121±15.6 days. Anterior migration was the most common reason for removal, reported in 17 cases, with the inferior convex polyethylene component predominately migrating. Additionally, 17 devices had a focalized deviation on the posterior quadrant of the articulating polyethylene ball, 11 of which had evidence of radiographic clinical migration. Histopathology and metrology findings indicated that wear debris did not contribute to clinical failure.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings of the present study, specifically the minimal bony ongrowth, lack of extraction damage, and radiographic imaging, indicated that most devices were removed due to migration. Metrology analysis revealed a depression on the posterior edge of the inferior endplate polyethylene ball, which correlated with anterior slippage. This may be a distinctive feature of the PCM’s relatively large ball-and-socket design that led to increased stress during extension, causing anterior migration.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"North American Spine Society Journal\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100768\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"North American Spine Society Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266654842500188X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Spine Society Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266654842500188X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多孔包覆运动(PCM)是一种球窝型颈椎间盘置换术,近期临床疗效良好。然而,长期研究发现移植物迁移是导致植入物移除的常见原因,因此该设备被从市场上撤出。鉴于这些差异,检索分析对于评估临床前测试是否准确预测临床表现至关重要。本研究旨在定量和定性地分析取出的PCM装置,以确定移除的主要原因,并评估观察到的损伤对整体装置固定的影响。方法收集37个PCM器械进行上市后监测。无损分析包括目视检查、照片记录和射线检查。分析测量使用坐标测量机评估关节面或数码显微镜进行端板表面特征表征。在适当的处理和储存条件下对所有设备进行氧化分析,并在组织样本可用时进行组织病理学检查。结果25台器械符合本研究的纳入标准。患者平均年龄为45.3±13.5岁,平均在体时间为121±15.6天。前移是最常见的切除原因,报告了17例,下凸聚乙烯组件主要迁移。此外,17个器械在关节聚乙烯球的后象限有聚焦偏差,其中11个有影像学临床偏移的证据。组织病理学和计量学结果表明,磨损碎片不会导致临床失败。结论本研究的结果,特别是最小的骨生长,缺乏拔牙损伤和x线影像,表明大多数装置是由于迁移而被移除的。计量分析显示下终板聚乙烯球后缘凹陷,与前滑脱相关。这可能是PCM相对较大的球窝设计的一个显著特征,导致伸展时应力增加,导致前移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Qualitative and quantitative retrieval analysis of a ball-and-socket cervical disc replacement

Background

The Porous Coated Motion (PCM) is a ball-and-socket cervical disc replacement with excellent reported short-term clinical outcome. However, longer-term studies identified migration as a common cause of implant removal and the device was withdrawn from the market. Given these discrepancies, retrieval analyses are crucial to assess whether preclinical testing accurately predicts clinical performance. This study aimed to quantitatively and qualitatively analyze retrieved PCM devices to identify primary reasons for removal and assess the impact of observed damage on overall device fixation.

Methods

Thirty-seven PCM devices were received for postmarket surveillance. Nondestructive analysis included visual examination, photographic documentation, and radiographic review. Analytical measurements were performed using a coordinate measuring machine to assess articulating surfaces or a digital microscope for endplate surface feature characterization. Oxidation analysis was performed on all devices with adequate handling and storage conditions, and histopathology was performed when tissue samples were available.

Results

Twenty-five devices met the inclusion criteria for this study. The mean patient age at retrieval was 45.3±13.5 years, with an average time-in-vivo of 121±15.6 days. Anterior migration was the most common reason for removal, reported in 17 cases, with the inferior convex polyethylene component predominately migrating. Additionally, 17 devices had a focalized deviation on the posterior quadrant of the articulating polyethylene ball, 11 of which had evidence of radiographic clinical migration. Histopathology and metrology findings indicated that wear debris did not contribute to clinical failure.

Conclusions

The findings of the present study, specifically the minimal bony ongrowth, lack of extraction damage, and radiographic imaging, indicated that most devices were removed due to migration. Metrology analysis revealed a depression on the posterior edge of the inferior endplate polyethylene ball, which correlated with anterior slippage. This may be a distinctive feature of the PCM’s relatively large ball-and-socket design that led to increased stress during extension, causing anterior migration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
48 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信