{"title":"个性化医疗的意识和兴趣:卫生专业人员的横断面调查研究。","authors":"Ali Mostafaei, Aysan Rahmani, Kavous Shahsavarinia, Sepideh Harzand-Jadidi, Nooshin Milanchian, Fatemeh Rahmati, Hanieh Salehi-Pourmehr, Sakineh Hajebrahimi","doi":"10.1080/17410541.2025.2538427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Personalized medicine (PM) is advancing disease prevention and treatment, but regulatory and clinical concerns persist, requiring evaluation of healthcare professionals' (HPs) knowledge and attitudes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>His study assessed PM awareness among HPs at Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Participants from diverse clinical departments completed a survey covering PM definitions, benefits, ethical concerns, genetic testing knowledge, attitudes, and barriers. A literature review guided question development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 141 HPs (55.3% male, 44.7% female), only 27.7% reported sufficient PM knowledge, though 82.3% acknowledged genetic health influences. Those with adequate knowledge more often endorsed PM tools (92.3% vs. 68.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.01) but expressed greater concern about healthcare disparities (82.1% vs. 67.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.03). Key barriers included cost (17%) and ethical risks, with 72% fearing PM would widen economic gaps and 23.4% anticipating insurance discrimination. Females and married HPs were more concerned about discrimination (<i>p</i> = 0.039 and <i>p</i> = 0.038, respectively). Despite concerns, 80% of physicians supported genome-guided prescribing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While HPs recognize PM's potential, limited awareness and ethical concerns hinder adoption. Addressing knowledge gaps and equity issues through education is crucial for PM integration in Iran.</p>","PeriodicalId":94167,"journal":{"name":"Personalized medicine","volume":" ","pages":"313-323"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Awareness, and interest in personalized medicine: a cross-sectional survey study of health professionals.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Mostafaei, Aysan Rahmani, Kavous Shahsavarinia, Sepideh Harzand-Jadidi, Nooshin Milanchian, Fatemeh Rahmati, Hanieh Salehi-Pourmehr, Sakineh Hajebrahimi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17410541.2025.2538427\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Personalized medicine (PM) is advancing disease prevention and treatment, but regulatory and clinical concerns persist, requiring evaluation of healthcare professionals' (HPs) knowledge and attitudes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>His study assessed PM awareness among HPs at Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Participants from diverse clinical departments completed a survey covering PM definitions, benefits, ethical concerns, genetic testing knowledge, attitudes, and barriers. A literature review guided question development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 141 HPs (55.3% male, 44.7% female), only 27.7% reported sufficient PM knowledge, though 82.3% acknowledged genetic health influences. Those with adequate knowledge more often endorsed PM tools (92.3% vs. 68.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.01) but expressed greater concern about healthcare disparities (82.1% vs. 67.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.03). Key barriers included cost (17%) and ethical risks, with 72% fearing PM would widen economic gaps and 23.4% anticipating insurance discrimination. Females and married HPs were more concerned about discrimination (<i>p</i> = 0.039 and <i>p</i> = 0.038, respectively). Despite concerns, 80% of physicians supported genome-guided prescribing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While HPs recognize PM's potential, limited awareness and ethical concerns hinder adoption. Addressing knowledge gaps and equity issues through education is crucial for PM integration in Iran.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personalized medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"313-323\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personalized medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17410541.2025.2538427\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personalized medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17410541.2025.2538427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Awareness, and interest in personalized medicine: a cross-sectional survey study of health professionals.
Background: Personalized medicine (PM) is advancing disease prevention and treatment, but regulatory and clinical concerns persist, requiring evaluation of healthcare professionals' (HPs) knowledge and attitudes.
Methods: His study assessed PM awareness among HPs at Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Participants from diverse clinical departments completed a survey covering PM definitions, benefits, ethical concerns, genetic testing knowledge, attitudes, and barriers. A literature review guided question development.
Results: Among 141 HPs (55.3% male, 44.7% female), only 27.7% reported sufficient PM knowledge, though 82.3% acknowledged genetic health influences. Those with adequate knowledge more often endorsed PM tools (92.3% vs. 68.6%, p = 0.01) but expressed greater concern about healthcare disparities (82.1% vs. 67.6%, p = 0.03). Key barriers included cost (17%) and ethical risks, with 72% fearing PM would widen economic gaps and 23.4% anticipating insurance discrimination. Females and married HPs were more concerned about discrimination (p = 0.039 and p = 0.038, respectively). Despite concerns, 80% of physicians supported genome-guided prescribing.
Conclusion: While HPs recognize PM's potential, limited awareness and ethical concerns hinder adoption. Addressing knowledge gaps and equity issues through education is crucial for PM integration in Iran.