个性化医疗的意识和兴趣:卫生专业人员的横断面调查研究。

Personalized medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-30 DOI:10.1080/17410541.2025.2538427
Ali Mostafaei, Aysan Rahmani, Kavous Shahsavarinia, Sepideh Harzand-Jadidi, Nooshin Milanchian, Fatemeh Rahmati, Hanieh Salehi-Pourmehr, Sakineh Hajebrahimi
{"title":"个性化医疗的意识和兴趣:卫生专业人员的横断面调查研究。","authors":"Ali Mostafaei, Aysan Rahmani, Kavous Shahsavarinia, Sepideh Harzand-Jadidi, Nooshin Milanchian, Fatemeh Rahmati, Hanieh Salehi-Pourmehr, Sakineh Hajebrahimi","doi":"10.1080/17410541.2025.2538427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Personalized medicine (PM) is advancing disease prevention and treatment, but regulatory and clinical concerns persist, requiring evaluation of healthcare professionals' (HPs) knowledge and attitudes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>His study assessed PM awareness among HPs at Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Participants from diverse clinical departments completed a survey covering PM definitions, benefits, ethical concerns, genetic testing knowledge, attitudes, and barriers. A literature review guided question development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 141 HPs (55.3% male, 44.7% female), only 27.7% reported sufficient PM knowledge, though 82.3% acknowledged genetic health influences. Those with adequate knowledge more often endorsed PM tools (92.3% vs. 68.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.01) but expressed greater concern about healthcare disparities (82.1% vs. 67.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.03). Key barriers included cost (17%) and ethical risks, with 72% fearing PM would widen economic gaps and 23.4% anticipating insurance discrimination. Females and married HPs were more concerned about discrimination (<i>p</i> = 0.039 and <i>p</i> = 0.038, respectively). Despite concerns, 80% of physicians supported genome-guided prescribing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While HPs recognize PM's potential, limited awareness and ethical concerns hinder adoption. Addressing knowledge gaps and equity issues through education is crucial for PM integration in Iran.</p>","PeriodicalId":94167,"journal":{"name":"Personalized medicine","volume":" ","pages":"313-323"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Awareness, and interest in personalized medicine: a cross-sectional survey study of health professionals.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Mostafaei, Aysan Rahmani, Kavous Shahsavarinia, Sepideh Harzand-Jadidi, Nooshin Milanchian, Fatemeh Rahmati, Hanieh Salehi-Pourmehr, Sakineh Hajebrahimi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17410541.2025.2538427\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Personalized medicine (PM) is advancing disease prevention and treatment, but regulatory and clinical concerns persist, requiring evaluation of healthcare professionals' (HPs) knowledge and attitudes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>His study assessed PM awareness among HPs at Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Participants from diverse clinical departments completed a survey covering PM definitions, benefits, ethical concerns, genetic testing knowledge, attitudes, and barriers. A literature review guided question development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 141 HPs (55.3% male, 44.7% female), only 27.7% reported sufficient PM knowledge, though 82.3% acknowledged genetic health influences. Those with adequate knowledge more often endorsed PM tools (92.3% vs. 68.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.01) but expressed greater concern about healthcare disparities (82.1% vs. 67.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.03). Key barriers included cost (17%) and ethical risks, with 72% fearing PM would widen economic gaps and 23.4% anticipating insurance discrimination. Females and married HPs were more concerned about discrimination (<i>p</i> = 0.039 and <i>p</i> = 0.038, respectively). Despite concerns, 80% of physicians supported genome-guided prescribing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While HPs recognize PM's potential, limited awareness and ethical concerns hinder adoption. Addressing knowledge gaps and equity issues through education is crucial for PM integration in Iran.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personalized medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"313-323\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personalized medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17410541.2025.2538427\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personalized medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17410541.2025.2538427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:个性化医疗(PM)正在推进疾病的预防和治疗,但监管和临床问题仍然存在,需要对卫生保健专业人员(hp)的知识和态度进行评估。方法:他的研究评估了伊朗大不里士医科大学hp的PM意识。来自不同临床科室的参与者完成了一项涵盖PM定义、益处、伦理问题、基因检测知识、态度和障碍的调查。文献综述引导问题发展。结果:141名hp(男性55.3%,女性44.7%)中,只有27.7%的人有足够的PM知识,尽管82.3%的人承认遗传健康影响。那些有足够知识的人更经常支持PM工具(92.3%对68.6%,p = 0.01),但对医疗保健差异表示更大的关注(82.1%对67.6%,p = 0.03)。主要障碍包括成本(17%)和道德风险,72%的人担心PM会扩大经济差距,23.4%的人担心保险歧视。女性和已婚hp更关心歧视(p = 0.039和p = 0.038)。尽管存在担忧,但80%的医生支持基因组指导处方。结论:虽然hp认识到PM的潜力,但有限的意识和伦理问题阻碍了采用PM。通过教育解决知识差距和公平问题对伊朗总理一体化至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Awareness, and interest in personalized medicine: a cross-sectional survey study of health professionals.

Background: Personalized medicine (PM) is advancing disease prevention and treatment, but regulatory and clinical concerns persist, requiring evaluation of healthcare professionals' (HPs) knowledge and attitudes.

Methods: His study assessed PM awareness among HPs at Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Participants from diverse clinical departments completed a survey covering PM definitions, benefits, ethical concerns, genetic testing knowledge, attitudes, and barriers. A literature review guided question development.

Results: Among 141 HPs (55.3% male, 44.7% female), only 27.7% reported sufficient PM knowledge, though 82.3% acknowledged genetic health influences. Those with adequate knowledge more often endorsed PM tools (92.3% vs. 68.6%, p = 0.01) but expressed greater concern about healthcare disparities (82.1% vs. 67.6%, p = 0.03). Key barriers included cost (17%) and ethical risks, with 72% fearing PM would widen economic gaps and 23.4% anticipating insurance discrimination. Females and married HPs were more concerned about discrimination (p = 0.039 and p = 0.038, respectively). Despite concerns, 80% of physicians supported genome-guided prescribing.

Conclusion: While HPs recognize PM's potential, limited awareness and ethical concerns hinder adoption. Addressing knowledge gaps and equity issues through education is crucial for PM integration in Iran.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信