喉罩在新生儿复苏中的应用:综述与跨学科合作的呼吁。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Sura Lee, Melissa B Jones, Vanessa K Cameron, Angela M McNelis, Ashley Darcy-Mahoney
{"title":"喉罩在新生儿复苏中的应用:综述与跨学科合作的呼吁。","authors":"Sura Lee, Melissa B Jones, Vanessa K Cameron, Angela M McNelis, Ashley Darcy-Mahoney","doi":"10.1097/JPN.0000000000000882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately 3.8 million babies are born each year with up to 10% requiring breathing assistance and 1% needing intensive resuscitation interventions. Effective ventilation is paramount for their outcomes, and laryngeal masks (LMs), also known as supraglottic airways, have emerged as safe, user-friendly tools for providing ventilation. However, despite Neonatal Resuscitation Program guidelines, there exist barriers impeding the routine utilization of LMs.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This narrative review aims to delineate the current understanding of LM usage in neonatal resuscitation, identify obstacles, and propose strategies for enhancing LM implementation and neonatal resuscitation outcomes through interdisciplinary collaboration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases including CINAHL/NURSING, Ovid/Medline, and PubMed were queried. Seven randomized controlled trials were identified, although none specifically targeted nurses in the United States.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Perspectives from nursing, medicine, education, and economics are essential for comprehensively addressing the multifaceted nature of the problem and devising innovative solutions transcending disciplinary boundaries.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite standardized education about LM, it is underutilized. This suggests an opportunity to improve neonatal outcomes by improving the routine use of LM to support vulnerable newborns immediately after birth. An interdisciplinary approach will help us better understand the problem from the various invested disciplines and offer solutions that exceed the scope of a single discipline.</p>","PeriodicalId":54773,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing","volume":"39 3","pages":"240-249"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laryngeal Mask Use in Neonatal Resuscitation: A Narrative Review and Call for Interdisciplinary Collaboration.\",\"authors\":\"Sura Lee, Melissa B Jones, Vanessa K Cameron, Angela M McNelis, Ashley Darcy-Mahoney\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JPN.0000000000000882\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately 3.8 million babies are born each year with up to 10% requiring breathing assistance and 1% needing intensive resuscitation interventions. Effective ventilation is paramount for their outcomes, and laryngeal masks (LMs), also known as supraglottic airways, have emerged as safe, user-friendly tools for providing ventilation. However, despite Neonatal Resuscitation Program guidelines, there exist barriers impeding the routine utilization of LMs.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This narrative review aims to delineate the current understanding of LM usage in neonatal resuscitation, identify obstacles, and propose strategies for enhancing LM implementation and neonatal resuscitation outcomes through interdisciplinary collaboration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases including CINAHL/NURSING, Ovid/Medline, and PubMed were queried. Seven randomized controlled trials were identified, although none specifically targeted nurses in the United States.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Perspectives from nursing, medicine, education, and economics are essential for comprehensively addressing the multifaceted nature of the problem and devising innovative solutions transcending disciplinary boundaries.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite standardized education about LM, it is underutilized. This suggests an opportunity to improve neonatal outcomes by improving the routine use of LM to support vulnerable newborns immediately after birth. An interdisciplinary approach will help us better understand the problem from the various invested disciplines and offer solutions that exceed the scope of a single discipline.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing\",\"volume\":\"39 3\",\"pages\":\"240-249\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPN.0000000000000882\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPN.0000000000000882","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:每年约有380万婴儿出生,其中高达10%需要呼吸辅助,1%需要强化复苏干预。有效的通气对其结果至关重要,喉罩(LMs),也被称为声门上气道,已经成为提供通气的安全,用户友好的工具。然而,尽管有新生儿复苏计划指南,仍存在阻碍LMs常规应用的障碍。目的:这篇叙述性综述旨在描述目前对LM在新生儿复苏中使用的理解,确定障碍,并提出通过跨学科合作加强LM实施和新生儿复苏结果的策略。方法:查询CINAHL/NURSING、Ovid/Medline、PubMed等数据库。七个随机对照试验被确定,尽管没有一个是专门针对美国护士的。结果:护理、医学、教育和经济学的观点对于全面解决问题的多面性和设计超越学科界限的创新解决方案至关重要。结论:尽管对LM进行了规范化的教育,但未得到充分利用。这表明有机会通过改善LM的常规使用来改善新生儿结局,以支持出生后立即脆弱的新生儿。跨学科的方法将帮助我们更好地从各个学科的投资中理解问题,并提供超越单一学科范围的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Laryngeal Mask Use in Neonatal Resuscitation: A Narrative Review and Call for Interdisciplinary Collaboration.

Background: Approximately 3.8 million babies are born each year with up to 10% requiring breathing assistance and 1% needing intensive resuscitation interventions. Effective ventilation is paramount for their outcomes, and laryngeal masks (LMs), also known as supraglottic airways, have emerged as safe, user-friendly tools for providing ventilation. However, despite Neonatal Resuscitation Program guidelines, there exist barriers impeding the routine utilization of LMs.

Purpose: This narrative review aims to delineate the current understanding of LM usage in neonatal resuscitation, identify obstacles, and propose strategies for enhancing LM implementation and neonatal resuscitation outcomes through interdisciplinary collaboration.

Methods: Databases including CINAHL/NURSING, Ovid/Medline, and PubMed were queried. Seven randomized controlled trials were identified, although none specifically targeted nurses in the United States.

Results: Perspectives from nursing, medicine, education, and economics are essential for comprehensively addressing the multifaceted nature of the problem and devising innovative solutions transcending disciplinary boundaries.

Conclusion: Despite standardized education about LM, it is underutilized. This suggests an opportunity to improve neonatal outcomes by improving the routine use of LM to support vulnerable newborns immediately after birth. An interdisciplinary approach will help us better understand the problem from the various invested disciplines and offer solutions that exceed the scope of a single discipline.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
147
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing (JPNN) strives to advance the practice of evidence-based perinatal and neonatal nursing through peer-reviewed articles in a topic-oriented format. Each issue features scholarly manuscripts, continuing education options, and columns on expert opinions, legal and risk management, and education resources. The perinatal focus of JPNN centers around labor and delivery and intrapartum services specifically and overall perinatal services broadly. The neonatal focus emphasizes neonatal intensive care and includes the spectrum of neonatal and infant care outcomes. Featured articles for JPNN include evidence-based reviews, innovative clinical programs and projects, clinical updates and education and research-related articles appropriate for registered and advanced practice nurses. The primary objective of The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing is to provide practicing nurses with useful information on perinatal and neonatal nursing. Each issue is PEER REVIEWED and will feature one topic, to be covered in depth. JPNN is a refereed journal. All manuscripts submitted for publication are peer reviewed by a minimum of three members of the editorial board. Manuscripts are evaluated on the basis of accuracy and relevance of content, fit with the journal purpose and upcoming issue topics, and writing style. Both clinical and research manuscripts applicable to perinatal and neonatal care are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信