Sura Lee, Melissa B Jones, Vanessa K Cameron, Angela M McNelis, Ashley Darcy-Mahoney
{"title":"喉罩在新生儿复苏中的应用:综述与跨学科合作的呼吁。","authors":"Sura Lee, Melissa B Jones, Vanessa K Cameron, Angela M McNelis, Ashley Darcy-Mahoney","doi":"10.1097/JPN.0000000000000882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately 3.8 million babies are born each year with up to 10% requiring breathing assistance and 1% needing intensive resuscitation interventions. Effective ventilation is paramount for their outcomes, and laryngeal masks (LMs), also known as supraglottic airways, have emerged as safe, user-friendly tools for providing ventilation. However, despite Neonatal Resuscitation Program guidelines, there exist barriers impeding the routine utilization of LMs.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This narrative review aims to delineate the current understanding of LM usage in neonatal resuscitation, identify obstacles, and propose strategies for enhancing LM implementation and neonatal resuscitation outcomes through interdisciplinary collaboration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases including CINAHL/NURSING, Ovid/Medline, and PubMed were queried. Seven randomized controlled trials were identified, although none specifically targeted nurses in the United States.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Perspectives from nursing, medicine, education, and economics are essential for comprehensively addressing the multifaceted nature of the problem and devising innovative solutions transcending disciplinary boundaries.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite standardized education about LM, it is underutilized. This suggests an opportunity to improve neonatal outcomes by improving the routine use of LM to support vulnerable newborns immediately after birth. An interdisciplinary approach will help us better understand the problem from the various invested disciplines and offer solutions that exceed the scope of a single discipline.</p>","PeriodicalId":54773,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing","volume":"39 3","pages":"240-249"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laryngeal Mask Use in Neonatal Resuscitation: A Narrative Review and Call for Interdisciplinary Collaboration.\",\"authors\":\"Sura Lee, Melissa B Jones, Vanessa K Cameron, Angela M McNelis, Ashley Darcy-Mahoney\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JPN.0000000000000882\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately 3.8 million babies are born each year with up to 10% requiring breathing assistance and 1% needing intensive resuscitation interventions. Effective ventilation is paramount for their outcomes, and laryngeal masks (LMs), also known as supraglottic airways, have emerged as safe, user-friendly tools for providing ventilation. However, despite Neonatal Resuscitation Program guidelines, there exist barriers impeding the routine utilization of LMs.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This narrative review aims to delineate the current understanding of LM usage in neonatal resuscitation, identify obstacles, and propose strategies for enhancing LM implementation and neonatal resuscitation outcomes through interdisciplinary collaboration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases including CINAHL/NURSING, Ovid/Medline, and PubMed were queried. Seven randomized controlled trials were identified, although none specifically targeted nurses in the United States.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Perspectives from nursing, medicine, education, and economics are essential for comprehensively addressing the multifaceted nature of the problem and devising innovative solutions transcending disciplinary boundaries.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite standardized education about LM, it is underutilized. This suggests an opportunity to improve neonatal outcomes by improving the routine use of LM to support vulnerable newborns immediately after birth. An interdisciplinary approach will help us better understand the problem from the various invested disciplines and offer solutions that exceed the scope of a single discipline.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing\",\"volume\":\"39 3\",\"pages\":\"240-249\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPN.0000000000000882\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPN.0000000000000882","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Laryngeal Mask Use in Neonatal Resuscitation: A Narrative Review and Call for Interdisciplinary Collaboration.
Background: Approximately 3.8 million babies are born each year with up to 10% requiring breathing assistance and 1% needing intensive resuscitation interventions. Effective ventilation is paramount for their outcomes, and laryngeal masks (LMs), also known as supraglottic airways, have emerged as safe, user-friendly tools for providing ventilation. However, despite Neonatal Resuscitation Program guidelines, there exist barriers impeding the routine utilization of LMs.
Purpose: This narrative review aims to delineate the current understanding of LM usage in neonatal resuscitation, identify obstacles, and propose strategies for enhancing LM implementation and neonatal resuscitation outcomes through interdisciplinary collaboration.
Methods: Databases including CINAHL/NURSING, Ovid/Medline, and PubMed were queried. Seven randomized controlled trials were identified, although none specifically targeted nurses in the United States.
Results: Perspectives from nursing, medicine, education, and economics are essential for comprehensively addressing the multifaceted nature of the problem and devising innovative solutions transcending disciplinary boundaries.
Conclusion: Despite standardized education about LM, it is underutilized. This suggests an opportunity to improve neonatal outcomes by improving the routine use of LM to support vulnerable newborns immediately after birth. An interdisciplinary approach will help us better understand the problem from the various invested disciplines and offer solutions that exceed the scope of a single discipline.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing (JPNN) strives to advance the practice of evidence-based perinatal and neonatal nursing through peer-reviewed articles in a topic-oriented format. Each issue features scholarly manuscripts, continuing education options, and columns on expert opinions, legal and risk management, and education resources. The perinatal focus of JPNN centers around labor and delivery and intrapartum services specifically and overall perinatal services broadly. The neonatal focus emphasizes neonatal intensive care and includes the spectrum of neonatal and infant care outcomes. Featured articles for JPNN include evidence-based reviews, innovative clinical programs and projects, clinical updates and education and research-related articles appropriate for registered and advanced practice nurses.
The primary objective of The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing is to provide practicing nurses with useful information on perinatal and neonatal nursing. Each issue is PEER REVIEWED and will feature one topic, to be covered in depth. JPNN is a refereed journal. All manuscripts submitted for publication are peer reviewed by a minimum of three members of the editorial board. Manuscripts are evaluated on the basis of accuracy and relevance of content, fit with the journal purpose and upcoming issue topics, and writing style. Both clinical and research manuscripts applicable to perinatal and neonatal care are welcomed.