急性A型主动脉夹层的死亡率——基于当代登记的系统评价。

IF 0.8 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Romanian Journal of Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2025-07-30 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.2478/rjim-2025-0015
Diana-Cristina Matei, Cornel Robu, Celia Georgiana Ciobanu, Oliviana Dana Geavlete, Elena-Laura Antohi, RăZvan Ilie Radu, Șerban Bubenek, Vlad Anton Iliescu, Ovidiu Chioncel
{"title":"急性A型主动脉夹层的死亡率——基于当代登记的系统评价。","authors":"Diana-Cristina Matei, Cornel Robu, Celia Georgiana Ciobanu, Oliviana Dana Geavlete, Elena-Laura Antohi, RăZvan Ilie Radu, Șerban Bubenek, Vlad Anton Iliescu, Ovidiu Chioncel","doi":"10.2478/rjim-2025-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) remains one of the most time-critical cardiovascular emergencies, with early mortality continuing to pose substantial clinical and organizational challenges. Large-scale observational registries offer valuable insights into real-world outcomes across healthcare systems.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To synthesize and compare early mortality rates in patients with ATAAD as reported by national and multicentre registries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A structured search was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Library for studies published within the last 10 years. We included registry-based studies reporting in-hospital, 30-day, operative or 48-hour mortality following ATAAD. Study characteristics, demographic profiles and preoperative risk factors were extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 studies, comprising 77,267 patients, were included. In-hospital mortality was reported in 13 registries (n = 50,470), with rates ranging from 5% to 29%. Thirty-day mortality was reported in 5 registries (n = 19,521) and operative mortality in 2 registries (n = 14,825). Substantial variation in outcome definitions and case inclusion criteria limited direct comparability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early mortality in ATAAD remains high and heterogeneous across registries. Strengthening global registry participation and adopting standardized reporting practices are essential steps toward improving risk stratification, guiding clinical decisions, and advancing equitable care in ATAAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":21463,"journal":{"name":"Romanian Journal of Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"209-220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mortality in acute type A aortic dissection - A systematic review based on contemporary registries.\",\"authors\":\"Diana-Cristina Matei, Cornel Robu, Celia Georgiana Ciobanu, Oliviana Dana Geavlete, Elena-Laura Antohi, RăZvan Ilie Radu, Șerban Bubenek, Vlad Anton Iliescu, Ovidiu Chioncel\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/rjim-2025-0015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) remains one of the most time-critical cardiovascular emergencies, with early mortality continuing to pose substantial clinical and organizational challenges. Large-scale observational registries offer valuable insights into real-world outcomes across healthcare systems.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To synthesize and compare early mortality rates in patients with ATAAD as reported by national and multicentre registries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A structured search was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Library for studies published within the last 10 years. We included registry-based studies reporting in-hospital, 30-day, operative or 48-hour mortality following ATAAD. Study characteristics, demographic profiles and preoperative risk factors were extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 studies, comprising 77,267 patients, were included. In-hospital mortality was reported in 13 registries (n = 50,470), with rates ranging from 5% to 29%. Thirty-day mortality was reported in 5 registries (n = 19,521) and operative mortality in 2 registries (n = 14,825). Substantial variation in outcome definitions and case inclusion criteria limited direct comparability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early mortality in ATAAD remains high and heterogeneous across registries. Strengthening global registry participation and adopting standardized reporting practices are essential steps toward improving risk stratification, guiding clinical decisions, and advancing equitable care in ATAAD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Romanian Journal of Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"209-220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Romanian Journal of Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/rjim-2025-0015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian Journal of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/rjim-2025-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急性A型主动脉夹层(ATAAD)仍然是时间最紧迫的心血管急症之一,其早期死亡率继续构成重大的临床和组织挑战。大规模观察性注册为了解医疗保健系统的实际结果提供了有价值的见解。目的:综合和比较国家和多中心登记报告的ATAAD患者的早期死亡率。方法:在PubMed、b谷歌Scholar和Cochrane Library中进行结构化检索,检索近10年发表的研究。我们纳入了报告ATAAD后住院、30天、手术或48小时死亡率的基于登记的研究。提取研究特征、人口统计学特征和术前危险因素。结果:共纳入20项研究,包括77,267例患者。13个登记区(n = 50,470)报告了住院死亡率,死亡率从5%到29%不等。5个登记区报告了30天死亡率(n = 19,521), 2个登记区报告了手术死亡率(n = 14,825)。结果定义和病例纳入标准的大量差异限制了直接可比性。结论:ATAAD的早期死亡率仍然很高,而且在不同的注册表中存在差异。加强全球登记参与和采用标准化报告做法是改善ATAAD风险分层、指导临床决策和促进公平护理的重要步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mortality in acute type A aortic dissection - A systematic review based on contemporary registries.

Background: Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) remains one of the most time-critical cardiovascular emergencies, with early mortality continuing to pose substantial clinical and organizational challenges. Large-scale observational registries offer valuable insights into real-world outcomes across healthcare systems.

Aim: To synthesize and compare early mortality rates in patients with ATAAD as reported by national and multicentre registries.

Methods: A structured search was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Library for studies published within the last 10 years. We included registry-based studies reporting in-hospital, 30-day, operative or 48-hour mortality following ATAAD. Study characteristics, demographic profiles and preoperative risk factors were extracted.

Results: A total of 20 studies, comprising 77,267 patients, were included. In-hospital mortality was reported in 13 registries (n = 50,470), with rates ranging from 5% to 29%. Thirty-day mortality was reported in 5 registries (n = 19,521) and operative mortality in 2 registries (n = 14,825). Substantial variation in outcome definitions and case inclusion criteria limited direct comparability.

Conclusions: Early mortality in ATAAD remains high and heterogeneous across registries. Strengthening global registry participation and adopting standardized reporting practices are essential steps toward improving risk stratification, guiding clinical decisions, and advancing equitable care in ATAAD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Romanian Journal of Internal Medicine
Romanian Journal of Internal Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
35
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Romanian Journal of Physics is a journal publishing physics contributions on the following themes: •Theoretical Physics & Applied Mathematics •Nuclear Physics •Solid State Physics & Materials Science •Statistical Physics & Quantum Mechanics •Optics •Spectroscopy •Plasma & Lasers •Nuclear & Elementary Particles Physics •Atomic and Molecular Physics •Astrophysics •Atmosphere and Earth Science •Environment Protection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信